Posted: June 15th, 2012 - 12:51pm
Source: barfblog

This is why I put question marks on some headlines: because something doesn’t seem quite right.
A story dated June 7, 2012 and published by ThePoultrySite – my favorite read while exfoliating in the bath – had this lede:
AUSTRALIA - Currently the NSW Food Authority is investigating 49 cases of Salmonella poisoning, suspected to be from consuming foods containing raw egg.
I dutifully blogged the news, not so much the research, but that there was yet another outbreak of salmonella in eggs which, given the track-record in Australia, would be far from surprising.
An answer arrived a week later in the form of an e-mail from the New South Wales Food Authority: “The information the Poultry CRC used was actually from a media alert posted on our website in 2007 - http://foodauthority.nsw.gov.au/news/alerts-recalls/alert-eggs-and-food-poisoning/.
Oops. Sorry. A table of raw-egg related outbreaks in Australia is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/raw-egg-related-outbreaks-australia.
http://www.thepoultrysite.com/poultrynews/25941/eggshell-quality-risks-of-foodborne-pathogens
http://www.barfblog.com/blog/155223/12/06/07/another-raw-egg-outbreak-australia