Spinach

  • Posted: June 20th, 2012 - 7:35am by Doug Powell

    On June 4, 2012, Brian Supalla, health program manager at Yavapai County Community Health Services went before the supervisor-types to discuss plans to introduce the 2009 FDA Food Code to the area.

    Supalla wasn't far into his PowerPoint presentation when he mentioned one of the provisions of the new code - that restaurants would not be allowed to offer hamburgers cooked less than well-done on their children's menus.

    He said that's because kids don't have well-developed immune systems and are more susceptible to food-borne illnesses.

    But Supervisor Chip Davis stopped him. "Do we have a lot of kids getting sick in Yavapai County from eating rare hamburgers?" Davis asked.

    Couldn’t find one of those but did find a kid sickened by E. coli O157:H7 in the 2006 spinach outbreak.

    As reported by the Verde Independent, Community Health Services Director Robert Resendes asked the family of Jacob Goswick, a Prescott Valley eighth-grader who was in the second grade when he ate spinach contaminated with E. coli bacteria, if Jacob would testify at the meeting.

    Jacob spent two months in Phoenix Children's Hospital - one month on dialysis - after his kidneys shut down, which is one of the potential side effects of food poisoning.

    Since the spinach E. coli outbreak in 2006, both Jacob and his mother, Juliana Goswick, have lobbied in Washington, D.C., to improve food safety.

    In his email to the Goswicks, Resendes said, "To have a family of your caliber and unfortunate compelling experience (speak to the board) would be ideal for the cause."

    He said that experience would show the supervisors "that indeed foodborne illnesses can and do affect area residents and that some of the newer pathogens, e.g., E. coli, are particularly dangerous to children."

    Juliana said she and Jacob would be willing to appear at the meeting, on Monday.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 24th, 2012 - 3:37pm by Doug Powell

    In 1996, California strawberry growers were wrongly fingered as the source of a cyclospora outbreak that sickened over 1,000 people across North America; the culprit was Guatemalan raspberries.

    After losing $15-20 million in reduced strawberry sales, the California strawberry growers decided the best way to minimize the effects of an outbreak – real or alleged – was to make sure all their growers knew some food safety basics and there was some verification mechanism. The next time someone said, “I got sick and it was your strawberries,” the growers could at least say, “We don’t think it was us, and here’s everything we do to produce the safest product we can.”

    In Sept. 2006, an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 killed four and sickened at least 200 across the U.S. This was documented outbreak 29 linked to leafy greens, but apparently the tipping point for growers to finally get religion about commodity-wide food safety, following the way of their farmer friends in California, 10 years later.

    In 2011, Jensen Farms, an eastern Colorado cantaloupe grower produced melons that killed 32 and sickened at least 146 with listeria in 28 states. One grower trashed the reputation of the revered Rocky Ford Melon: plantings this year are expected to be down 75 per cent.

    Now the Rocky Ford Growers Association has turned to government-delivered food safety audits rather than third-party audits, and committed to emboss a QR code on every melon it slates for retail sale. This QR code will tell consumers where the melon was grown, harvested, and prepared.

    Location doesn’t mean safety. Include the production details.

    In Aug. 2011, Oregon health officials confirmed that deer droppings caused an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak traced to strawberries, many sold at roadsides, that sickened 14 people and killed one.

    So when NPR asks, Are local salad greens safer than packaged salad greens, it’s the wrong question.

    It’s not whether large is safer than local, conventional safer than organic: it’s about the poop, and what any grower is doing to manage the poop. Or risks.

    Any farm, processor, retailer or restaurant can be held accountable for food production – and increasingly so with smartphones, facebook and new toys down the road. Whether it’s a real or imaginary outbreak of foodborne illness, consumers will rightly react based on the information available.

    Rather than adopt a defensive tone, any food provider should proudly proclaim – brag – about everything they do to enhance food safety. Explanations after the discovery of some mystery ingredient, some nasty sanitation, sorta suck.

    Microbial food safety should be marketed at retail so consumers actually have a choice and hold producers and processors – conventional, organic or otherwise – to a standard of honesty. Be honest with consumers and disclose what’s in any food; if restaurant inspection results can be displayed on a placard via a QR code read by smartphones when someone goes out for a meal, why not at the grocery store? Or the school lunch? For any food, link to web sites detailing how the food was produced, processed and safely handled. Manage the poop, manage the risk, brag about the brand.

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
  • Posted: April 19th, 2012 - 10:09pm by Doug Powell

    Should bagged, pre-washed salad greens be washed again in the home kitchen?

    Many food safety types say no.

    During the idle but oh-so-smoothing brand of chat-chit practiced by National Public Radio that preceded a story about E. coli and Salmonella in leafy greens from Salinas, Calif., one reporter said, “I wash it every time but I don’t know if it actually helps.”

    Reporter Dan Charles responded, “It says prewashed but washing might help.”

    So might a lot of others things not fit for this family publication.

    A review paper published in Food Protection Trends in 2007 contained guidelines developed by a panel of food safety types and concluded:

    "… leafy green salad in sealed bags labeled ‘washed’ or ‘ready-to-eat’ that are produced in a facility inspected by a regulatory authority and operated under cGMPs, does not need additional washing at the time of use unless specifically directed on the label.”

    The panel also advised that additional washing of ready-to-eat green salads is not likely to enhance safety.

    “The risk of cross contamination from food handlers and food contact surfaces used during washing may outweigh any safety benefit that further washing may confer."

    When washing at home, "there's a risk that is the sink where you just washed your chicken," said Donald Schaffner, Rutgers University professor of food science, in a 2011 interview.

    Today’s NPR soothfest revisited what growers in California are doing to enhanced food safety and the 2006 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in spinach that killed 3 and sickened at least 200.

    Will Daniels, senior vice president for operations and organic integrity at Earthbound Farm, based in San Juan Bautista, told NPR, "I was at the center of the investigation and really took it very hard. It was just a real tough time to go through, and something that I don't ever want to go through again."

    Investigators found E. coli bacteria that matched the microbes that were making people sick on a ranch that was one of Earthbound's suppliers. But those bacteria were in animal feces a mile from the spinach field, Daniels says, "with no clear indication of what caused the contamination from a mile away to get into the spinach field itself."

    "Unfortunately, it looks like every animal is suspect," says Bob Martin, general manager of Rio Farms, in King City, Calif.

    Even birds. "Birds are a big issue! They carry human pathogens, and we can't put diapers on them. We can't dome our fields; there's nothing we can do, short of trying to scare them away.”

    Lettuce fields now have to be separated from cattle pastures, and throughout the valley, next to lettuce fields, you see white plastic pipes. Inside those pipes are mouse traps.

    And the birds? Vegetable buyers won't take anything from the area directly under power lines.

    "When it comes to food safety, if it's grown outdoors, forget it, there's no such thing as zero tolerance," says Bob Martin. "And everybody knows that, except for some food safety personnel of the big food buyers."

    Daniels of Earthbound Farms was further quoted as saying, "It is a true test-and-hold program, so we have to wait to get the negative results before we put it on a truck. Any positives go to the landfill.”

    There still are positives. Not very often, but every five weeks or so, one of these tests catches a sample that's contaminated with disease-causing E. coli or Salmonella.

    A table of leafy green related outbreak is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/leafy-greens-related-outbreaks.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 23rd, 2011 - 9:38pm by Doug Powell

    Continuing with theme of bad press release writing and UNNECESSARY EMPHASIS WITH ALL CAPS, Avon Heights Mushrooms is recalling certain packages of fresh packaged spinach. The brands include Krisp Pak 1 Ooz bags, Better Brand 10oz.bags, and Avon Heights 4-2.51b bags.

    “The implicated packages have a "best if used by" code of DEC16 and codes DP 340 and T691.

    "During routine surveillance sampling, one package of Better Brand 10oz spinach tested positive for ecoli 0157h”

    They mean E. coli O157:H7.

    “Out of a preponderance of caution the company is recalling all packages produced on the affected day.

    “NO ILLNESSES have been associated with this incident.

    “Consumers should discard the product with the specific codes and write to the company address on the package for a refund. Refunds will only be given for the product with the above specified codes.”

    Yes, people should throw the contaminated spinach away, cross-contamination with E. coli O157:H7 is too risky, but what about people who just write down the correct code and mail in for a refund?

    And why no location for Avon Heights Mushrooms in the original press release, although I’m guessing Pennsylvania.

    WHERE WAS THE SPINACH GROWN?

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: November 27th, 2011 - 12:18am by Doug Powell

     Woe is the California lettuce and spinach grower.

    "It was just more regulations. More inspections. More paperwork. More filings. More fees," said Chris Bunn, part of a four-generation Salinas Valley farming family. Now in his 60s, he quit two years after the 2006 outbreak. "I miss it terribly," Bunn said. "It was a wonderful business."

    Deborah Schoch, a senior writer at the California HealthCare Foundation Center for Health Reporting, writes in the Mercury News today that five years after their healthy-looking green fields became the epicenter of a national food disaster, farmers in the Salinas Valley are still working to regain something even the most bountiful harvest can't ensure: the public's trust.

    They are doing their best to rebound after investigators linked spinach grown and bagged here to a deadly E. coli strain that would kill three people, sicken 206 more and shake the nation's faith in California leafy greens. So far, they have succeeded in avoiding another major outbreak.

    Last year, Monterey County produced spinach worth $127.5 million, down from $188.2 million in 2005, according to reports from the county agricultural commissioner's office.

    Salinas Valley growers and processors have retooled nearly every step in their industry -- from planting seedlings to harvesting and washing greens. They have rallied to create a state-industry pact on how to protect 14 types of leafy greens that is being held up as a national model.

    "It was the watershed moment for the produce industry," said Joe Pezzini, chief operating officer of Ocean Mist Farms in Castroville.

    Too bad it didn’t happen 10 years earlier.

    In October, 1996, a 16-month-old Denver girl drank Smoothie juice manufactured by Odwalla Inc. of Half Moon Bay, California. She died several weeks later; 64 others became ill in several western U.S. states and British Columbia after drinking the same juices, which contained unpasteurized apple cider -- and E. coli O157:H7. Investigators believed that some of the apples used to make the cider might have been insufficiently washed after falling to the ground and coming into contact with deer feces.

    Almost 10 years later, on Sept. 14, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that an outbreak of E. coli O157: H7 had killed a 77-year-old woman and sickened 49 others (United States Food and Drug Administration, 2006). The FDA learned from the Centers for Disease Control and Wisconsin health officials that the outbreak may have been linked to the consumption of produce and identified bagged fresh spinach as a possible cause.

    In the decade between these two watershed outbreaks, almost 500 outbreaks of foodborne illness involving fresh produce were documented, publicized and led to some changes within the industry, yet what author Malcolm Gladwell would call a tipping point -- "a point at which a slow gradual change becomes irreversible and then proceeds with gathering pace"(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipping_Point) -- in public awareness about produce-associated risks did not happen until the spinach E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in the fall of 2006. At what point did sufficient evidence exist to compel the fresh produce industry to embrace the kind of change the sector has heralded since 2007? And at what point will future evidence be deemed sufficient to initiate change within an industry?

    In 1996, following extensive public and political discussions about microbial food safety in meat, the focus shifted to fresh fruits and vegetables, following an outbreak of Cyclospora cayetanesis ultimately linked to Guatemalan raspberries that sickened 1,465 in 21 U.S. states and two Canadian provinces (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997), and subsequently Odwalla. That same year, Beuchat (1996) published a review on pathogenic microorganisms in fresh fruits and vegetables and identified numerous pathways of contamination.

    By 1997, researchers at CDC were stating that pathogens could contaminate at any point along the fresh produce food chain -- at the farm, processing plant, transportation vehicle, retail store or foodservice operation and the home -- and that by understanding where potential problems existed, it was possible to develop strategies to reduce risks of contamination. Researchers also reported that the use of pathogen-free water for washing would minimize risk of contamination.

    Yet it would take a decade and some 29 leafy green-related outbreaks before spinach in 2006 became a tipping point.

    What was absent in this decade of outbreaks, letters from regulators, plans from industry associations and media accounts, was verification that farmers and others in the farm-to-fork food safety system were seriously internalizing the messages about risk, the numbers of sick people, and translating such information into front-line food safety behavioral change.

    Today, according to  Schochmajor food and retail chains, from McDonald's to Walmart, want proof that their lettuce is as clean as any natural product can be.

    That means no cattle grazing uphill from a spinach farm, no roaming wild pigs, no farm crews without hairnets or gloves, no missing reports.

    Some food chains even send inspectors unannounced.

    "They'll be the Toyota Camry with the Hertz sticker on the edge of the field, looking with binoculars," said Mike Dobler, 50, a third-generation grower who works with his family on a large-scale vegetable farm based in Watsonville.

    "They're looking to see if you're doing what you say you're doing," Dobler said.

    Before September 2006, he said, "we were taken at our word, and nobody asked."

    Actually, lots of people asked, including FDA, state public health types, journalists, lawyers and academics. Growers apparently just didn’t pay attention.

    A table of leafy green related outbreaks is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/leafy-greens-related-outbreaks (they didn’t all originate with California produce, but lots did).

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: October 17th, 2011 - 5:19am by Doug Powell

    lettuce.tomato.skull_.jpg

    The 1996 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in Odwalla unpasteurized juice first plunged the fresh produce folks into public crisis mode, much like the Jack-in-the-Box E. coli outbreak of 1993 did for hamburger.

    Cyclospora in Guatemalan raspberries in 1996 – it wasn’t California strawberries -- added to the public consciousness that fresh could also be risky.

    From 1996-2006, almost 500 outbreaks of foodborne illness involving fresh produce were documented, publicized and led to some changes within the industry, yet what author Malcolm Gladwell would call a tipping point -- "a point at which a slow gradual change becomes irreversible and then proceeds with gathering pace" -- in public awareness about produce-associated risks did not happen until the spinach E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in the fall of 2006.

    At least not to the produce-industry leadership who decided those 500 other outbreaks aren’t worth mentioning.

    That produce industry leaders snoozed for a decade was reinforced, probably unintentionally, by Bryan Silbermann, president of the U.S. Produce Marketing Association during his Oct. 15, 2011 state-of-the-industry address.

    Silbermann said recent weeks felt “eerily” like the lead-up to the PMA summit in 2006, when an outbreak from spinach contaminated with E. coli “hung like a black cloud over us.” In the past month, listeria-tainted cantaloupes from Colorado farm led to at least 23 deaths in 12 states.

    Preventing similar outbreaks requires holding accountable everyone involved in growing, shipping and selling fresh produce and not taking shortcuts, Silbermann said.

    “It does not matter whether you grow ship or sell along this supply chain, I want you to consider some fundamental truths we must accept as we look for ways to turn this tide around. It must be turned around. Our future depends on it.”

    “We have come so far, yet we find ourselves in the same situation in 2006,” Silbermann said.

    Or 1996.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 27th, 2011 - 2:37pm by Doug Powell

    The folks that produce fresh spinach and lettuce are channeling their inner Milkshake, dialing back to late 2003 when weblogs or blogs began to emerge in force, and launched their own blog – last week.

    The awkwardly named Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement – LGMA for funksters – is starting a “new dialogue on leafy greens food safety” with at least two blog posts a month.

    Lowered expectations is good, especially when LGMA is eight years late to the blogshpere and about 10 years late to the food-safety-in-produce thing. The worst is to start a web page or a blog and then not follow through. Listeria-stricken Maple Leaf Foods hasn’t posted anything new on its Journey-inspired Our Journey to Food Safety Leadership, since Nov. 2010. Maybe they are on other journeys, looking for that small town girl.

    LGMA chairman Jamie Strachan wrote in the inaugural blog on April 14, 2011, that it’s been four years since this “first-of-its-kind program began. It hasn't been easy, but the very fact that the LGMA exists today is proof that the challenges of implementing a comprehensive food safety system for an entire commodity can be overcome.”

    LGMA didn’t invent it. Lots of groups have marketing orders. We did the whole food safety thing with the Ontario Greenhouse Vegetable Marketing Board – as it was called back then – in 2000.

    Chairman Strachan also writes, “I'm often asked, ‘How do you know the LGMA is working?’

    “The answer to that question is simple — the LGMA is working to establish a culture of food safety on leafy greens farms. Most farmers will tell you that leafy greens were safe before the LGMA came along, but what is changed today is the high level of attention food safety on the farm now receives. Everyone involved in operations, from the farmer to the harvesters, know and understand that food safety considerations are ALWAYS top of mind.”

    That’s not verification. And people who write in all caps are YELLING to get attention, maybe because their writing sucks.

    They’ve got the rhetoric; where’s the reality?

    There have been many reinterpretations of history regarding fresh produce and microbial food safety. We have argued the tipping point was 1996, involving both the Odwalla E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in unpasteurized juice, coupled with the cyclospora outbreak which was initially and erroneously linked to California strawberries (it was Guatemalan raspberries). This led to the first attempts at comprehensive on-farm food safety programs for fresh produce because, these bugs ain’t going to be washed off; they have to be prevented, as much as possible, from getting on or in fresh produce on the farm.

    For the growers of leafy greens, things apparently didn’t tip until the 2006 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in bagged spinach from California that sickened 200 and killed four, despite 29 previous outbreaks and years of warning from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    A table of leafy green foodborne illness outbreaks is available at:
    http://bites.ksu.edu/Outbreaks%20related%20to%20leafy%20greens%201993-2010

    Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture decided proposed to take LGMA national.

    “The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is requesting comment on the creation of a voluntary National Leafy Green Marketing Agreement (NLGMA) that would assist all segments of the leafy green industry in meeting commercial food quality and safety requirements.”

    Full justification for the proposed rule is available at http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5077207

    When we were hanging out with greenhouse tomato growers, the joke we got familiar with was:

    “What’s the worst thing you can say to a farmer?”

    “Hi, I’m from the government, I’m here to help.”

    If the government needs to be involved, things have really gone bad.

    Should a federal food safety program be based on LGMA, a group that was dragged to the food safety party and is always behind?

     

    Stop waiting for government.
    And stop channeling Kelis. Make test results public, market food safety at retail so consumers can choose, and if people get sick from your product, be the first to tell the public.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 30th, 2011 - 5:46pm by Doug Powell

    CBC News asked hockey goon and University of British Columbia microbiology type Kevin Allen to test 44 packages of sprouts for bacteria from across the country and he found lots.

    There was no salmonella but Allen found 93 per cent tested positive for bacteria, and in some cases, high levels of enterococci bacteria, which is an indicator of fecal contamination.

    "They [bacteria found] come from our intestinal tract and we don't want the contents of our intestinal tract on our food," he said.

    Sprouts are particularly susceptible to contaminants because they are grown in moist, warm environments, which are ideal for the rapid growth of bacteria, Allen said, adding that washing them before consuming them likely wouldn't help.

    "Personally, I don't consume sprouts and I would not feed them to my children, either," Allen said.

    Allen also tested 106 samples of bagged veggies and found 79 per cent of the herbs and 50 per cent of the spinach had similar bacterial contamination.

    Allens report can be found at http://www.cbc.ca/manitoba/includes/pdfs/produce_survey.pdf. We all look forward to the results being published in a peer-reviewed journal before being further bandied about.

    A table of North American raw sprout-related outbreaks is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/sprout-associated-outbreaks-north-america
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Raw Food  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 21st, 2010 - 8:05pm by Amy Hubbell

    Author: 
    Amy Hubbell

    As we all recover from the flu, our appetites are only mediocre. In the spirit of things, I cooked an Archer Farms spinach and goat cheese pizza for dinner tonight. I added olives because that's one of the few things Sorenne currently loves. When looking at the cooking time and temp I noticed detailed directions that seem straight from this blog:

    "For food safety, cook to an internal temperature of 165F as measured with a food thermometer.

    Ovens vary: adjust baking time accordingly. Refrigerate or discard leftovers immediately."

    This prompted me to play 100 questions with Doug, which he enjoys.

    Me: "There's no meat on this pizza. Is 165 the temperature for killing salmonella?" 

    Doug: "Yes."

    Me: "How do I put a thermometer in a pizza?"

    Doug: "Do you think mere mortals know where to put it? Why don't you try it?"

    So I did (exactly as pictured). After cooking the pizza at 400F for about 18 minutes, I took it out and tried to eye the thickest part. Then I tried to put the thermometer in somewhat sideways being careful not to poke through the other side. To take the picture, I had to prop the thermometer on my spatula. The process made a big gash in my pizza toppings and the cheese stuck like glue on the thermometer, but it was easy to see the pizza was well above 165F.

    The pizza was tasty but the outside crust overly crunchy and the inner crust still a bit soggy. Sorenne picked off the olives and ate them all, and I enjoyed a Boulevard Nutrcracker Seasonal Ale with mine. 

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: October 22nd, 2010 - 6:35am by Doug Powell

    PCA.AIB_.certificate.jpg

    The voluntary quality control system widely used in the nation's $1 trillion domestic food industry is rife with conflicts of interest, inexperienced auditors and cursory inspections that produce inflated ratings, according to food retail executives and other industry experts.

    I’ve been saying that for a long time, but this is the Washington Post version, published this morning. I especially like the pictures of the Montgomery Burns Awards for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence, courtesy of AIB, the Manhattan, Kansas-based audiots that gave a stellar rating to PCA and Wright Eggs just prior to terrible food safety outbreaks and revelations of awful production conditions (see below).

    The system has developed primarily because large chain stores and food producers, such as Kellogg's, want assurances about the products they place on their shelves and the ingredients they use in making food. To get that, they often require that their suppliers undergo regular inspections by independent auditors. This all takes place outside any government involvement and without any signals - stamps of approval, for instance - to consumers. (That’s four-year-old Zoe Warren, right, of Bethesda, who was hospitalized in 2007 after contracting salmonella poisoning after eating a chicken pot pie. The photo is by Susan Biddle for the Washington Post.)

    The third-party food safety audit scheme that processors and retailers insisted upon is, in many cases, no better than a financial Ponzi scheme. The vast number of facilities and suppliers means audits are required, but people have been replaced by paper.

    In fact, most foodmakers, even those with problems, sail through their inspections, said Mansour Samadpour, who owns a food-testing firm that does not perform audits. "I have not seen a single company that has had an outbreak or recall that didn't have a series of audits with really high scores.”

    Third-party food audits, like restaurant inspection, are a snapshot in time. Given the international sourcing of ingredients, audits are a requirement, but so is internal food safety intelligence to make sense of audits that are useful and audits that are chicken poop.

    Industry experts say some "third-party" inspections can be rigorous. Those that audit using internationally recognized private benchmarks "are much more thorough," said Robert Brackett, former senior vice president of the Grocery Manufacturers Association. "But they're less likely to be used because they are much more expensive."

    Audits, inspections, training and systems are no substitute for developing a strong food safety culture, farm-to-fork, and marketing food safety directly to consumers rather than the local/natural/organic hucksterism is a way to further reinforce the food safety culture.

    Will Daniels, who oversees food safety for Earthbound Farm, the folks who brought E. coli O157:H7 in bagged spinach in 2006 that sickened 199 and killed four, said, Earthbound regularly received top ratings in third-party audits, including one exactly a month before the tainted spinach was processed, adding,

    "No one should rely on third-party audits to insure food safety."

    “… if the incentive is to pass with flying colors, it creates a disincentive to air your dirty laundry and get dinged and lose a customer over it.”

    After the E. coli outbreak, Earthbound put in place an aggressive testing and safety program that includes outside audits but also requires Earthbound's own inspectors to show up unannounced to check suppliers. The company tests its greens for pathogens when they arrive from farms and again when they are packaged.

    Too bad Earthbound didn’t figure all this out after the 28 other outbreaks involving leafy greens prior to the deadly 2006 outbreak.

    Cost is another factor.

    Food companies often choose the cheapest auditors to minimize the added expense of inspections, which range from about $1,000 to more than $25,000.

    The foodmakers can prepare for audits because they often know when inspectors will show up.

    And auditors have a range of experience and qualifications, from recent college graduates to retired food industry veterans. They sometimes walk through a plant, ticking off a checklist to produce a score, Samadpour said. Basic inspections do not typically include microbial sampling for bacteria.

    In a written response to questions, Brian Soddy, AIB's vice president of marketing and sales, said company audits are intended to give food manufacturers "guidance and education for improvement."

    Producers have the ultimate responsibility, he said, adding that the audits are voluntary and not intended to replace any FDA regulatory inspections.
    AIB said last week that it is reevaluating its "superior" and "excellent" rating systems because they "have led to confusion in the wake of recent incidents," Soddy wrote.

    Some retailers include inspections as just one piece of their safety programs.

    Costco, for example, has its own inspectors but also requires its estimated 4,000 food vendors to have their products inspected according to a detailed 10-page list of criteria. Private auditors must X-ray all products for "sticks and stones, bones in seafood - anything you can think of that might be in hot dogs, baked goods, outside of produce," said Craig Wilson, Costco's assistant vice president for food safety and quality assurance.

    Costco maintains an approved list of about nine audit firms. The list does not include AIB.

    Wal-Mart requires suppliers of private-label food products sold in its stores and Sam's Club to be audited using private internationally recognized standards.

    In addition to conducting its own product testing, Giant Food requires its vendors to be audited from a list of about a dozen approved firms.

    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments