Lawsuit

  • Posted: September 2nd, 2011 - 3:21am by Doug Powell

    “I would be the first one to defend any company if the data were incomplete or if the investigation didn’t show an association, but this one almost reminds me of the intimidation lawsuits the tobacco industry has used in the past.”

    That’s what Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, told Doug Ohlemeier of The Packer regarding Del Monte’s lawsuit targeting Oregon’s top food safety scientist, William Keene.

    Michael Doyle, a former Food and Drug Administration advisor who heads the Center for Food Safety at the University of Georgia, said he fears such lawsuits could limit effectiveness of public health messages to consumers.

    “One of the most difficult points that epidemiologists have to make is the call as to whether a specific food is a vehicle for an outbreak. If they do this later than sooner, more people could be exposed to the implicated food and made ill. There needs to be a balance because some epidemiologists may be overly aggressive with insufficient information or pulling the trigger too fast. This lawsuit could do more harm than good but it might make epidemiologists more cognizant of the fact that they’re responsible for not only public health, but economic consequences.”

    Dennis Christou, Fresh Del Monte’s vice president of marketing, said the suit is necessary to ensure investigations are conducted properly.

    “When a product recall is later determined baseless due to a failure to conduct a comprehensive and reliable investigation, the public health is not protected. The investigation must be comprehensive and reliable such that the public can be reasonable confident that the product recall effectively eliminates the threat to consumer safety.”

    A table of cantaloupe-related outbreaks is available at: http://bites.ksu.edu/cantaloupe-related-outbreaks.
     

    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 30th, 2011 - 9:17pm by Doug Powell

    Del Monte Fresh Produce, a company that recalled its cantaloupes in March after health investigators in several states linked them to a Salmonella Panama outbreak, said yesterday that is plans to sue Oregon Health Authority and, Dr William Keene, one of the nation's most well-known disease outbreak investigators (right, exactly as shown), claiming that the company's products were wrongly singled out.

    Lisa Schnirring of CIDRAP news at the University of Minnesota interviewed several public health types, who say the company's suit is unprecedented, and some worry that it may inhibit future foodborne illness investigations.

    Lon Kightlinger, MPH, PhD, state epidemiologist with the South Dakota Department of Health, said some of his department's disease investigations have involved legal tug-of-wars. "Although we do have some worries of legal threats, that does not drive our investigation, but causes us to do a better job," he said.

    In Iowa, laws require public health officials to treat the names of entities such as restaurants or companies the same as people, said Patricia Quinlisk, MD, MPH, medical director and state epidemiologist for the Iowa Department of Public Health.

    She said that, before going public with names, health officials must discuss the issue with the state attorney general's office to make sure the action complies with a "necessary for public health" clause. "Thus something like this might have more scrutiny here than other places," she said, adding that she's never seen a legal threat like Del Monte's.

    Tim Jones, MD, MPH, state epidemiologist for the Tennessee Department of Health, said he's been bullied and subjected to implied threats in the course of epidemiologic investigations. "I've never taken them seriously, and legally I've never been worried," he said.

    Though Del Monte's legal threat could create an inhibitory effect, epidemiologists take pride in being able to respond to outbreaks faster and freer than federal agencies, which are often bound by legal restrictions, Jones said.

    "Our job is to protect people."

    Some measure of immunity is needed for investigators, Jones said. "If anyone in public health is nervous about getting sued, it could be dangerously inhibitory."

    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 25th, 2011 - 1:10am by Doug Powell

    Rinse the damn syrup containers.

    That’s the lesson as victims of a 2008 salmonella outbreak at the International House of Pancakes left a Potter County courtroom with more than $1.4 million in damages.

    The jury, which included eight men and four women, deliberated for more than three hours before returning a verdict of $140,000 for each of the 10 plaintiffs.

    Dean Boyd, one of the victims’ attorneys, said in closing arguments that the compelling, graphic testimony should be a warning for other Amarillo restaurants to keep their facilities clean.

    “Two of the clients seriously came very close to death,” Boyd said. “Others’ injuries were very bad and their tear-filled testimony proved that.”

    The case stems from three separate salmonella outbreaks that sickened the restaurant’s patrons, starting in June 2008.

    From the first known poisoning case in June to a city health review in September, more than 125 people who ate at the IHOP location were victims of salmonella poisoning, according to court records.

    Interviews with IHOP employees revealed the syrup pitchers were not washed or sanitized before they were refilled, according to the initial civil complaint.

    During that time, the restaurant closed its doors three times in response to potential salmonella outbreaks. The closures were prompted by a June 2008 city review in which 11 IHOP employees tested positive for the salmonella toxin.

    In the last case, which prompted the September 2008 closure, city officials determined the cause was an infected water bath used to warm bottles of syrup.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: May 20th, 2011 - 10:02pm by Doug Powell

    In the fall of 2008, 235 people got sick dining at a Harvey’s fast-food restaurant at a major thoroughfare in North Bay, Ontario, about four hours north of Toronto (that’s in Canada).

    A report by the North Bay and District Health Unit concluded the outbreak was probably caused by raw Spanish onions and poor cleaning of onion slicing machines.

    Today, the North Bay Nugget reported that depositions are scheduled to continue this month in a class-action suit against the restaurant, according to the law firm handling the claim.

    The statement of claim alleges Cara Operations Ltd., 1233280 Ontario Inc. and Summit Food Distributors were negligent because they provided food or beverages contaminated with E. coli, says the website for law firm Sutts, Strosberg LLP.

    It says depositions started in November with a representative from each party asked questions about documents that had been produced and issues in the lawsuit.

    These examinations were adjourned when it was learned the franchise owner also filed a separate lawsuit against Cara and others claiming the outbreak at the restaurant "ruined their business and caused the business to be sold at a loss."

    The claim was filed on behalf of all people who ate the restaurant from Sept. 12, 2008 to Oct. 12, 2008 and all people who were infected due to secondary contact with them.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 5th, 2011 - 6:39am by Doug Powell

    Pigeon poop has been implicated in several public meltdowns, like when Kings of Leon left the stage at a concert last year (was anyone really disappointed?) or when swimmers at last year’s Commonwealth Games started barfing.

    A Michigan man who once worked on the Soo Locks is suing his former employers, alleging that he suffered a debilitating illness from on-the-job exposure to pigeon droppings.

    The Detroit News reports that 54-year-old Bruce Harrison sued Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co. and Canadian National/Illinois Central Railroad in federal court on Monday. His suit alleges that the companies failed to protect him from hazardous work conditions.

    Harrison says he developed symptoms consistent with histoplasmosis -- a respiratory disease that can be spread by spores in bird droppings -- that have left him unable to work.

    He worked on the Soo Locks from 1990 to 2006 and says he was exposed to pigeon droppings on the railroad bridges at the locks at Sault Ste. Marie in Michigan's northeast Upper Peninsula.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 11th, 2010 - 2:56pm by Doug Powell

    That’s just gross; highly unlikely. Adults, eating Chocolate Chip Crunch cereal.

    And the tampon.

    A couple from Upson County, Georgia, is suing a grocery store chain in federal court, claiming that the husband found a used tampon in his bowl of cereal.

    According to the complaint, Thomas and Lynn Roddenberry said they bought a box of Chocolate Chip Crunch cereal from the Save-A-Lot store in Thomaston in October 2008. A day after buying the cereal, Thomas Roddenberry said he discovered the tampon in his bowl after taking a bite of the cereal.

    The man said he spit out the cereal, immediately became nauseated and went to an emergency room.

    The suit was filed on Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Macon. A spokesman for Save-A-Lot declined to comment on the case on Friday, citing pending litigation.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 26th, 2010 - 12:18pm by Doug Powell

    Associated Press reports a California man who says he ordered French onion soup and bit into a condom instead of melted cheese has settled his lawsuit against the Claim Jumper restaurant chain.

    The terms of today's settlement were not disclosed.

    Both sides say in a statement the deal indicates no admission of liability by either party.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 14th, 2010 - 11:06pm by Doug Powell

    Been a long time since that Harvey’s E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in North Bay, Ontario that sickened at least 235 people who dined there in 2008.

    A report by the North Bay and District Health Unit concluded the outbreak was probably caused by raw Spanish onions and poor cleaning of onion slicing machines.

    Maybe they’re the same onions being used by all those Subway outlets in Illinois.

    The statement of claim alleges Cara Operations Ltd., 1233280 Ontario Inc. and Summit Food Distributors were negligent because they provided food or beverages contaminated with E. coli, according to the website for law firm Sutts, Strosberg LLP.

    It says the lawsuit includes family members and secondary infections of people who became sick through contact with others who had eaten at the restaurant.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 6th, 2010 - 7:29am by Doug Powell

    The USA Today yesterday reported a Virginia man is suing mega pet chain PetSmart for $1 million after slipping in dog feces at their store in Newport News, Va.

    Robert Holloway alleges that the retailer and its employees "negligently allowed animals to enter the premises and deposit feces in such a manner as to create a dangerous and hazardous condition" and that it should've been cleaned up. His suit claims that he slipped during the incident last year, injuring his back and knocking out four teeth. He was 69 at the time, according to the Virginian-Pilot.

    A judge dismissed a suit brought in 2008 by a woman who said she slipped in urine and injured her knee at the same PetSmart location.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 5th, 2010 - 11:16am by Doug Powell

    santa.barf_.sprout.raw_.milk_.jpg

    Three groups or individuals have knowingly tried to sue me for evidence-based food safety statements I have made over the years: a grower of raw sprouts, a grower of organic produce, and The Food Network in Canada.

    It’s a telling list, to which the Weston A. Price Foundation can now be added – sorta.

    On March 26, 2010, Mike Nichols of the Wilwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel wrote about raw milk, stating,

    “… I had to ask the question that everybody is asking of late out in our nation's capital. I asked it of Kathy Kramer, a nutritionist and office manager at the Weston A. Price Foundation in Washington, D.C., a place that vociferously supports drinking raw milk.

    What if you get sick?

    ‘That is rare,’ she told me, adding that people have been drinking raw milk in some states for a long time.

    But what if you do?

    ‘We just don't see that as an issue,’ she said.”

    Given the number of outbreaks and people barfing because of consuming raw dairy products, especially when compared on a per capita basis – number of sick people per food serving consumed, and the vast majority of people consume pasteurized products – I thought the statement was a little over-the-top and put it in barfblog.com.

    “"We just don't see that as an issue.” …

    Lots of foods make people sick. Some of these illnesses are easily preventable. For an organization such as Weston Price that is often quoted or cited as some sort of authority on raw milk (or dentistry) to publicly state that people getting sick isn’t an issue demonstrates their priorities – and it doesn’t have much to do with you.

    This was re-posted by Seattle-lawyer Bill Marler on his Marlerblog.com

    (I know all this detail is boring and repetitive, but it may be going somewhere.)

    Kimberly Hartke, who is apparently the publicist for the Weston A. Price Foundation, e-mailed Marler to say,

    “Calling someone a ‘so-called’ nutritionist is as close to libel as I think
    you can get.

    “Kathy Kramer, when she had this conversation, was not even aware of the
    foodborne illness issue going on in Wisconsin. She handles administrative
    duties in the office, and doesn't handle press inquiries, and from what I
    understand she was not even aware she was talking to a reporter.

    “Perhaps she should find a good attorney!”

    Marler told her to talk with barfblog.com, “and if you sue, I would be honored to defend them. By the way, I think WP needs better press people.”

    Hartke the publicist then e-mailed me to say the person who originally quoted in the newspaper was,

    “… an adminstrative person in our office and does not field press inquiries, I do.

    “So, needless to say, her remark is being blown way out of proportion, because it seems inappropriate under the circumstances.

    “Please add this as a comment to your blog or tell your readers the truth behind her statement.

    “WAPF consumers are extremely health and food safety conscious, which is why we source from local farms. We believe pasteurized, adulterated products of any kind are less safe, less nutritious.”

    Marler’s right. This so-called publicist doesn’t seem particularly good at her job. People who proclaim to speak truth are demagogues who should not be trusted because they promote faith-based food safety. I eagerly await the data demonstrating that food from local farms is microbiologically safer that other farms.

    And when it comes to data, a raw milk provider at the center of a legal battle in British Columbia told Toronto’s Globe and Mail newspaper Saturday she isn't worried about anyone becoming sick from her milk, adding,

    “’We do the very best that we possibly can.’ … Those who pay her for the milk and to look after the cows, which are tested annually for various pathogens, can visit the farm any time.”

    She said her view is that raw milk is a pure form of God-given food, and business – via pasteurization – changes what's pure. There have been times she's wanted to stop the dairy, but her strong faith kept her going.

    Similarly in Indiana, Kyra Miller said of the milk in stores,

    "I would not call it a God-given food."

    Instead, as she picked up milk from Forest Grove. "I'm getting it natural, straight from the cow. I know there's no extra additives. I know his cows are grass-fed."

    Grass-fed cows as a source of supposedly safe raw milk is another source of faith-based food safety. Trust is the essence of almost all food purchases. But data is required to verify that trust. And with these raw milk pushers, it’s just not there. Trust, but verify.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Raw Food  |  Comments