Thermometers

  • Posted: July 23rd, 2011 - 5:19am by Amy Hubbell

    Author: 
    Amy Hubbell

    I used to cook. And then I met Doug. And all the food safety that I quickly learned scared me.

    It’s no secret that Doug does all the cooking in our family. So now that Sorenne and I are in Australia patiently awaiting his arrival, I’ve cooked several frightening meals. I have no way of knowing if the chicken, sausage, or beef are going to kill us. I’ve looked for meat thermometers rather seriously at different major stores here and the only one I’ve seen was at Target – a ridiculously large round display on top of a probe. Think American turkey thermometer that comes out only at Thanksgiving and magnify the size by about 5. I tried again at Coles tonight… nada.

    For dinner tonight I opted for pre-made raw meatballs to accompany the linguine because having a small child around is not conducive to getting up to your elbows in meat (especially when she’s screaming, “Mooooooom! Milk!”). I did my best to make a well-done meatball (I mean, who doesn’t love crispy meatballs), but how are mere mortals supposed to see if something’s cooked just by using our naked eyeballs?

    Come on, Australia. Food safety is not just an American thing. I’m tired of worrying whether I’ll kill our 2 ½ year old over dinner. And I miss my favorite food safety expert’s voice in my ear reminding me to use a meat thermometer.

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 1st, 2011 - 7:18pm by Doug Powell

    There is so much crap on the Internet.

    Ozersky.tv has some dude claiming to make the perfect burger; it’s a perfect example of microbial cross-contamination as he handles the meat and then everything else.

    Ozersky likes his burgers medium-rare and pink in the middle; crustry throughout, with no temperature verification and a side of dangerous microorganisms.

    He also uses slices of Velveeta because it melts at room temperature.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 1st, 2011 - 8:29am by Doug Powell

    Chef Ramsey’s kitchen rage is topped only by Donald Trump’s hair, rants, and famous line “you are fired.”

    The final challenge on Ramsey’s latest show was to determine which of two chefs stays one more week by cooking three steaks each, one rare, one medium, and one well done. As one of the chefs uses a tip sensitive digital thermometer to check temperatures, Chef Graham Elliot comments something along these lines – every time he uses the thermometer, he lets those juices flow out.

    According to the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, medium steaks should be cooked to an internal temperature of 160º F, well done 170º F and rare is not listed, but it’s usually around 120º-125º F (no one really knows). Four out of the six steaks looked pretty much the same (right, exactly as shown), so we’ll never know what the temperatures were.

    When I ask for my steak to be rare, get it to at least 120º F and don’t even think about using the cheek or hand tests.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 20th, 2011 - 2:48pm by Doug Powell

    According to the cookbook, Grillin’ with Gas by Hank Hill Fred Thompson, and reproduced on Culinate:

    “Judging the doneness of steak is not as much science as it is technique and feel.

    “Poke your index finger into your cheek at mouth level. Then press your finger into the steak. If they feel very similar, that’s an indication of a rare steak.

    “Touching the tip of your nose gives you the feel of a medium steak, and touching your forehead is a medium-well to well-done steak.”

    Use a tip-sensitive thermometer and stick it in.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 17th, 2011 - 10:24am by Doug Powell

    I learned to cook watching my mom – and cooking shows.

    But watching Bobby Flay’s show on grilling was a cross-contamination nightmare.

    He touched cooked, ready-to-eat steak right after handling raw dough. After tasting the steak, he went back to the dough. He later prepared some sort of grilled chicken breasts, which would have been fine, except he touched the grapes and everything else that made up his salad without washing his hands after handling the raw chicken.

    These shows are recorded in different shots and might take proper safety procedures in-between takes, but unless the viewer is told, who would know?

    All raw food has the potential to be contaminated, so be the bug. And stick it in with a tip-sensitive digital thermometer.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 14th, 2011 - 10:39am by Doug Powell

    The food safety bureaucrats who say cook food until it’s piping hot have come out with an entire publication about what it means to be science-based.

    The U.K. Food Standards Agency says science is fighting back against pseudoscience and asks whether the Agency has played a role in this.

    For an agency with multi-millions to spend on food safety communication, why can’t they get the science right, and stick it in?

    Use a tip-sensitive digital thermometer. Color and piping hot are pseudoscience.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 6th, 2011 - 6:40am by Doug Powell

    It’s food safety week in the U.K.

    So expect some communication nosestretchers.

    The Food Standards Agency said more than half of those surveyed in Scotland believed they could tell if food was safe to eat by its smell or appearance.

    But the agency says potentially dangerous food bugs such as E. coli and salmonella do not always make food smell "off" and do not affect the way it looks.

    Yet the Food Standards Agency advice on cooking meat is until the juices run clear or it’s piping hot.

    It’s a terrible risk communication strategy to tell people they are food safety dumb when the government advice – cook until piping hot or the juices run clear – is also dumb.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: May 24th, 2011 - 10:08am by Doug Powell

    For all those countries who recommend cooking meat until the juices run clear, or until it’s piping hot, what new words will be used to describe 145F pork? A little pink?

    Or as Associated Press reports, “A bit of pink in pork appears to be OK after all.”

    Sounds a little (food) pornographic.

    And before all those food porn chefs start bragging they knew all along pink pork was safe, provide evidence you know how to use a tip-sensitive digital thermometer and actually do it.

    Use a thermometer and stick it in.

    Today, the U.S. Department of Agriculture is updating its recommendation for safely cooking pork, steaks, roasts, and chops. USDA recommends cooking all whole cuts of meat to 145 °F as measured with a food thermometer placed in the thickest part of the meat, then allowing the meat to rest for three minutes before carving or consuming.

    This change does not apply to ground meats, including ground beef, veal, lamb, and pork, which should be cooked to 160 °F and do not require a rest time. The safe cooking temperature for all poultry products, including ground chicken and turkey, remains at 165 °F.

    "With a single temperature for all whole cuts of meat and uniform 3 minute stand time, we believe it will be much easier for consumers to remember and result in safer food preparation," said Under Secretary Elisabeth Hagen. "Now there will only be 3 numbers to remember: 145 for whole meats, 160 for ground meats and 165 for all poultry."

    USDA is lowering the recommended safe cooking temperature for whole cuts of pork from 160 °F to 145 °F and adding a three-minute rest time. The safe temperature for cuts of beef, veal, and lamb remains unchanged at 145 °F, but the department is adding a three-minute rest time as part of its cooking recommendations. Cooking raw pork, steaks, roasts, and chops to 145 °F with the addition of a three-minute rest time will result in a product that is both microbiologically safe and at its best quality.

    A "rest time" is the amount of time the product remains at the final temperature, after it has been removed from a grill, oven, or other heat source. During the three minutes after meat is removed from the heat source, its temperature remains constant or continues to rise, which destroys pathogens. USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) has determined that it is just as safe to cook cuts of pork to 145 °F with a three minute rest time as it is to cook them to 160 °F, the previously recommended temperature, with no rest time. The new cooking suggestions reflect the same standards that the agency uses for cooked meat products produced in federally inspected meat establishments, which rely on the rest time of three minutes to achieve safe pathogen reduction.

    Appearance in meat is not a reliable indicator of safety or risk. Only by using a food thermometer can consumers determine if meat has reached a sufficient temperature to destroy pathogens of public health concern. Any cooked, uncured red meats – including pork – can be pink, even when the meat has reached a safe internal temperature.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: May 20th, 2011 - 10:35am by Doug Powell

    In the latest installment of Whole Foods Market has terrible food safety advice -- blaming consumers for getting sick, selling raw milk in some stores, offering up fairytales about organic and natural foods – today’s grilling tip is that “chicken that is cooked enough will feel springy when pressed. If you’re uncertain, cut into the thickest part of one piece. The meat should still be juicy, but the juices should be clear, never reddish.”

    Color is a lousy indicator.

    Use a tip-sensitive digital thermometer.

    Toronto’s Globe and Mail has gotten into the trend of using someone with what appears to be an Australian accent to flog food but seems to skimp on the food safety.

    Stephen Alexander, owner of Cumbrae Meats, says in a video  that, “cooking a burger to medium is totally fine as long as you start with good quality fresh ground meat.”

    I don’t know what medium means. How is good quality defined, by bacterial counts? And where’s the thermometer, the same one Alexander uses when cooking chicken on the grill but that Whole Foods doesn't know exists.

    Cook’s Illustrated likes its burgers “juicy and rosy throughout.” 

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: May 17th, 2011 - 12:54pm by Doug Powell

    I love the smell of lasagna in the morning.

    Smells like victory.

    Not napalm.

    I make lasagna in batches, with whole grain noodles, canned tomatoes, a bunch of frozen veggies and whatever else is rotting in the crisper drawer, ricotta, mozzarella, eggs, ground turkey and beef (cooked in water, fat removed), basil, rosemary, garlic, onion and more spinach than you would think possible.

    Lasagna is assembled in casserole dishes, into the freezer, and eventually cooked in the oven to at least 160F.

    As shown by the temps below, that can take some time (the first one was after 90 minutes in a 350F oven). But it’s better when it all gets to sit around in its own stuff.

     

     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Thermometers  |  Comments