Animals

  • Posted: July 19th, 2011 - 5:15am by Doug Powell

    Unfortunately, TV doctors are often idolized and imitated. Seeing Ellen Pompeo (Meredith Grey from Grey’s Anatomy) take her almost two-year-old daughter to a petting zoo demonstrates there is a long way to go reducing zoonotic diseases transmission and prevention awareness at petting zoos.

    Children under the age of five are considered a high-risk group, add a pacifier, petting a baby goat, and a rabbit, and there is a high-risk situation for zoonotic disease transmission. Baby ruminants and poultry intermittently excrete substantial numbers of germs, which is why it is not recommended to have these young animals at petting zoos. Pacifier, bottles, or any items that will end up in the visitor’s mouth are all conduits for the fecal-oral route of exposure to pathogens. Keep children under five on your arms at all times, prevent strollers and baby items from entering the human-animal contact areas, and if you pet an animal, thoroughly wash your hands with soap and water afterwards.

    Petting zoo-related outbreaks have been recorded worldwide; an updated table is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/petting-zoos-outbreaks.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Animals  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 5:59pm by Sol Erdozain

    Author: 
    Sol Erdozain

    I like having a glass of wine with my dinner every now and then. It tastes good and they say it’s good for you, so I don’t even have to feel guilty about it.

    Apparently, a group of farmers in British Columbia think the health benefits also apply to cattle. The idea is a variation of the Kobe beef, where cattle are fed beer. Unlike Kobe beef, the wine is not fed every day.

    “It’s during the final 90 days leading up to their slaughter that they are fed red wine supplied by a number of wineries in the Okanagan Valley.”

    The final product is sweeter-tasting meat that is supposedly more tender. Plus, the cows get to die buzzed.

    I wonder, if they did this with dairy cows, would wine and cheese parties become obsolete?

     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Animals  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 12th, 2010 - 10:57am by Doug Powell

    There are any number of agricultural production systems out there, each with their own way of making a buck and each with a certain level of hucksterism involved. I focus on whether the system and the end product are microbiologically safe. The best producers use techniques – regardless of political ideology – that fit best in their production system in their geographic location.

    A new study in Foodborne Pathogens and Disease compared bacterial contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from 50 grass-fed and 50 conventionally produced beef products. The researchers from Purdue University and China concluded there was no safety advantage for either group.

    The abstract is below:

    Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from “grass-fed” labeled beef products
    Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
    Jiayi Zhang, Samantha K. Wall, Li Xu, Paul D. Ebner
    http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/fpd.2010.0562
    Abstract
    Grass-fed and organic beef products make up a growing share of the beef market in the United States. While processing, animal handling, and farm management play large roles in determining the safety of final beef products, grass-fed beef products are often marketed as safer alternatives to grain-finished beef products based on the potential effects of all-forage diets on host microbiota. We conducted a series of experiments examining bacterial contamination rates in 50 beef products labeled as “grass-fed” versus 50 conventionally raised retail beef products. Coliform concentrations did not differ between conventional and grass-fed beef (conventional: 2.6 log10 CFU/mL rinsate; grass-fed: 2.7 log10 CFU/mL rinsate). The percentages of Escherichia coli positive samples did not differ between the two groups (44% vs. 44%). Enterococcus spp. were frequently isolated from both grass-fed beef products (44%) and conventional beef products (62%; p=0.07). No Salmonella or E. coli O157:H7 isolates were recovered from any of the meat samples. Enterococcus spp. isolates from conventional beef were more frequently resistant to daptomycin and linezolid (p<0.05). Resistance to some antimicrobials (e.g., chloramphenicol, erythromycin, flavomycin, penicillin, and tetracyline) was high in Enterococcus spp. isolated from both conventional and grass-fed beef. There were no differences in the percentages of antimicrobial resistant E. coli isolates between the two groups. Taken together, these data indicate that there are no clear food safety advantages to grass-fed beef products over conventional beef products.

     

    Your rating: None (6 votes)
    Animals  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 27th, 2010 - 9:23pm by Amy Hubbell

    Author: 
    Amy Hubbell

    To entertain Sorenne today, we stopped by the Hallmark store at the Manhattan Mall. In addition to her favorite Webkinz, we found miniature (living) frogs in little glass cubes. Sorenne was fascinated with what she called, “fish.”

    Accompanying the display was a clearly posted warning about handling reptiles. Although frogs are amphibians, I was delighted to see the information. I asked the store staff if I could take a picture. They were taken aback by the request but didn’t mind. The poster from the CDC highlights what Doug has often said in the past: “Do not nuzzle or kiss your pet reptile.” Other tips include:

    - Always wash your hands thoroughly after you handle your pet reptile, its food and anything it has touched.
    - Keep your pet reptile in a habitat designed for it; don’t let it roam around the home.
    - Keep your pet reptile and its equipment out of the kitchen or any area where food is prepared.
    - Keep reptiles out of homes where there are children under 1 year of age or people with weakened immune systems. Children under 5 should handle reptiles only with adult/parental guidance. And, they should always remember to wash their hands afterwards.

    We didn't buy a frog today, but I'm sure that request will come in time.

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Animals, Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 4th, 2010 - 9:40pm by Doug Powell

    One of my favorite songs of all time, Friday I’m in Love, by The Cure, pretty much states that Friday is the best most awesome day of the week. This is true, except for this past Friday, when my wife and I were woken up at 3 a.m. by a foul stench coming from our kitchen.

    Our lovely puppy – 56-pound yellow lab – decided to go for an all-poop-that-you-can-eat buffet in our backyard, when she was just supposed to be frolicking and enjoying the cold weather after having dinner. So, if your dessert consists of poop, you will most likely barf it all out, unless you are a rabbit, in which case you are fine. That’s what our dog did. She barfed all that poop all over our kitchen floor.

    The question is, besides whether you still love your dog or not, how to clean all that poop?

    - If you own a pair of disposable or rubber gloves, now is a good time to put them on.

    - Tie the dog outside somewhere, so that she won’t keep stepping on poop and spreading it.

    - Remove the dog’s bed, which is covered in poop and place it in the washer, with detergent and if available, bleach.

    - Collect excess poop with paper towels and put them in a leak-proof trash bag.

    - Once all the excess is gone, spray everything with the disinfectant of your choosing.

    - Wipe with paper towels and repeat.

    I went a step further and cleaned the whole floor with a swiffer and bleach, and then I even polished it, just to try to get rid of the smell from my hardwood floor. By the time I was done cleaning this mess it was around 4 a.m.

    Don’t eat poop. And wash your hands. Often.. Often, like this banner at 810 Zone in Kansas City states, means after every use of the bathroom, every time you touch raw foods, and every time you touch your pet or its food or its barf.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Animals  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 19th, 2010 - 11:04am by Doug Powell

    Movie director Kevin Smith, known for the witty and obscene dialogue in movies he’s penned like Clerks, Chasing Amy and Dogma, was deemed a flight risk by a Southwest airlines pilot last weekend and ordered off the plane.

    "I know I'm fat, but was Captain Leysath really justified in throwing me off a flight for which I was already seated?" he ranted through his Twitter account to over 1.6 million followers.. "Again: I'm way fat... But I'm not THERE just yet. But if I am, why wait til my bag is up, and I'm seated WITH ARM RESTS DOWN.”

    Smith posted this pic of himself (above, right, exactly as shown) puffing out his cheeks and captioned it, "Look how fat I am on your plane! Quick! Throw me off!"

    Another emerging issue on airplanes is those travelling with small pets.

    An editorial in the current issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal notes that air travel has become increasingly difficult, with tightened security restrictions and a decreased number of services. But now Air Canada is adding to the difficulty by allowing small pets to travel airplane cabins.

    Pets can be accommodated comfortably and safely in airplane cargo holds, which is where they belong. Airlines must choose to put the needs of their human passengers first, or be forced to do so.

    Flying should not include avoidable health risks, especially, for passengers with allergies to pets. Many people with allergies to animals will have a reaction when they're trapped in an enclosed space, often for hours.

    The Canadian Transportation Agency ruled that people allergic to nuts should be considered to have a disability under the Canada Transportation Act and must therefore be accommodated. The agency is now receiving passenger complaints about pets on airplanes and considering whether those with allergies to pets should also be considered as having a disability. Such a finding would force Canadian airlines to safeguard passengers with pet allergies.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Animals  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 15th, 2010 - 6:33pm by Michelle Mazur

    Author: 
    Michelle Mazur

    As a veterinary student at Kansas State University, I hear quite a bit about the growing demand for food animal veterinarians. With the increasing cost of tuition for vet school, it’s understanding that many of my colleagues are choosing to specialize in small animal medicine to help pay off school loans. But the looming threat of agroterrorism, emerging diseases and heightened food security shows an increased demand for food animal vets.

    The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) reports, Only about 17 percent of veterinarians work in food supply, including practicing veterinarians and veterinarians working for governmental and corporate organizations. This is in contrast to the turn of the 19th century, when virtually every veterinarian was a food supply veterinarian. Moreover, research forecasts a shortfall of 4-5 percent per year in the ranks of food supply veterinarians.
     
     
    Philip Lowe, from the Centre for Rural Economy at the University of Newcastle, has said the proportion of time vets in private practice spent treating animals used for food halved between 1998 and 2006 – due in part to the fact most vets run their own businesses, and pet owners have proved a more sustainable and lucrative source of income than farmers.
     
    Professor Lowe argues in the journal Veterinary Record that due to this shift there has been a failure to make use of vets' considerable and wide ranging expertise.
     
    Various programs have been proposed to encourage vet students to enter food animal practice and help alleviate the problem of an enlarging veterinary student debt to salary ratio. Two programs that have been implemented are the Student Loan Repayment Program through the USDA and the National Veterinary Medical Service Act
     
    These programs and future opportunities will help veterinary students join the nation’s food safety task force, and hopefully also increase our knowledge base and preparedness for foreign animal diseases within the United States. This is a critical time in the veterinary world, in which veterinarians must take full advantage of their skill sets to protect the nation’s food supply.

    To read more about the food animal vet shortage, visit the AVMA's Food Supply Veterinary Medicine media page.
    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Animal Welfare, Animals  |  Comments
  • Posted: January 26th, 2010 - 10:07pm by Michelle Mazur

    Author: 
    Michelle Mazur

    The hottest word (in my opinion) of 2009: wal-creature. If you’re a late night Wal-Mart shopper like me (I’d rather avoid the daytime crowd), then there’s a pretty good chance that you’ve come across one. A wal-creature is anyone shopping at Wal-Mart wearing outlandish or ridiculous clothing, whether it be too tight or blindingly bright. A wal-creature could be Mimi from Drew Carey. Wal-creatures may be encountered in real life, but more often are photographed and put up on one of my favorite sites: peopleofwalmart.com. The site has daily updates with pictures and captions of the craziest people spotted in Wal-Mart. 

    First off, I’m pretty surprised that some of these people leave their house dressed as they are. Secondly, I can’t believe how many of these people have been photographed in the store with animals. There aren’t too many Wal-Marts around without a food section, so there’s a very good chance that these animals have accompanied their owners on that side of the store. Peopleofwalmart.com includes photos of wal-creatures with monkeys (2 of them), raccoons, snakes, pigs, and even macaws.
     
    In my opinion, the photo with the macaw is the most disturbing. The caption says it best: “Oh no Ms., it’s cool, I love stepping in parrot sh*t whenever I’m buying celery. Nothing says sanitary like a parrot in the produce section…” I cannot believe this lady got away with bringing a giant Salmonella factory into the produce section of a grocery store. I’m a big proponent of service dogs – dogs only. This bird’s rectum is pointed precariously close to the cases of strawberries. Unfortunately the manager at the store couldn’t have done anything about it (whether he was aware of the bird in the store or not). Laws are in place to protect disabled people with service animals from being asked to leave stores. Managers are not even allowed to ask what their disability is (which isn’t overly apparent in this situation) and disabled patrons are not required to show documentation for their service animals. I wish this could be regulated somehow because I have suspicions that the bird isn’t a real service animal, instead it’s just a pet.
     
    Pets in grocery stores gross me out and tick me off. Wal-creatures just scare me.

     

    Your rating: None
    Animals  |  Comments
  • Posted: January 17th, 2010 - 6:12pm by Katie Filion

    Author: 
    Katie Filion

    The past few weeks in Wellington have been windy and rainy, so to fight the black cloud blues my Canadian visitor and I traveled north to the Coromandel peninsula for some sun. The beaches were gorgeous and the skies cloudless.

    While up north I decided to visit a petting zoo (animal farm). I know these activities are marketed towards families with children under 10, but I love animals and couldn’t resist. I paid the dollar for a bag of food, and as I proceeded to enter the zoo the lady at the counter told me to sign the waiver form. The form basically excused the zoo of any wrongdoing that happened to visitors, and instructed visitors not to feed the pigs. There was no mention of the potential illnesses that can be spread by being in contact with some of the animals, or the steps to prevent these illnesses (hand washing), although there were signs in the toilets (see right).

    I cut my visit short after feeding a horse. I had a flashback to the North Carolina girl whose finger was bitten off by a zebra and decided to return to the beach instead – but not before I washed my hands.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Animals, Handwashing  |  Comments
  • Posted: November 11th, 2009 - 6:13am by Doug Powell

    The cafeteria food fight, as immortalized in the 1978 film, Animal House, has become a high school rite of passage.

    Except in Chicago (home to John Belushi, right)

    The New York Times reports this morning that 25  students, ages 11 to 15, were rounded up, arrested, taken from school and put in jail on charges of reckless conduct, a misdemeanor, after a food fight at the middle-school campus of Perspectives Charter Schools, in the Gresham neighborhood on the South Side.

    That was last Thursday afternoon. Now parents are questioning what seem to them like the criminalization of age-old adolescent pranks, and the lasting legal and psychological impact of the arrests.

    “My children have to appear in court,” Erica Russell, the mother of two eighth-grade girls who spent eight hours in jail, said Tuesday. “They were handcuffed, slammed in a wagon, had their mug shots taken and treated like real criminals.”


     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)