March 2012

  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 11:15pm by Doug Powell

    It’s much better to get vaccinated before exposure.

    Customers who recently ate at the Fairway Market deli on Quadra Street in Victoria, British Columbia (that’s in Canada) are urged to get vaccinated for hepatitis A after an employee tested positive for the virus this week.

    The Vancouver Island Health Authority is urging anyone who ate deli food prepared in-store on March 18, 19, 20, 22, 25 or 26 to receive a hepatitis A vaccine as a precaution.

    Drop-in immunization clinics for Fairway Market employees and eligible members of the public will take place Saturday and Sunday at the Victoria Health Unit, located at 1947 Cook St., from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.

    Customers at the deli between March 7 and 15 may also have been exposed to the virus but vaccines will no longer be effective because too much time has passed, said Charmaine Enns, a VIHA medical health officer.

    "It becomes of interest to the public and to us when that [infected] person is a food handler, because then it's not just that person's circle of close contacts who is at risk, it's the general public now at risk," Enns said.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Hepatitis A  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 5:57pm by Doug Powell

    Dr. Oz did a show a couple of years ago, would your home pass a restaurant inspection?, that was broadcast the other day in Australia (Days of Our Lives is at least two years behind; it’s all background).

    Forget the flaws in the methodology, the risk amplification inherent in feeding a family and feeding 1,000 people a day, the television nonsense: Dr. Oz willingly lets his cat on the kitchen food prep counter.

    And Heston-norovirus-Blumenthal has great food prep tips, but still don’t know food safety. For his latest show (which may also be two years behind) he “takes off his chef whites and steps into a domestic kitchen to show viewers how to inject some Heston-style magic into homemade cooking.”

    What I briefly saw was a Mitt Romney-styled I’m one of the boys segments, as a local rugby team arrived by boat at his country home and they all took a turn grinding beef for burgers on the barbie; outside on a table. Cross-contamination everywhere.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 5:19pm by Doug Powell

    As New York City and food pornographers elsewhere embrace raw meats, one country with a strong culture of raw beef is moving to ban some dishes.

    In 2011, E. coli O111 in raw beef killed four and sickened at least 70 in Japan. On Friday, a health ministry panel proposed banning all raw beef liver served at restaurants, after it was discovered that it contains E. coli O157.

    Japan Times reports the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry will swiftly refer the matter to the Food Safety Commission under the Cabinet Office. Once the commission compiles a report, the new ban could be incorporated in the Food Sanitation Law and come into effect as early as June.

    Violations regarding raw liver, considered a delicacy, would be punishable by up to two years in prison or a maximum fine of ¥2 million.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 8:17am by Doug Powell

    Oysters from Australian waters are a delight on the grill, although I’ve graduated to scallops on the half-shell, also grilled.

    But whenever I go see Paul the fish monger, he’s offering me a sample of his wares – raw – and I politely decline.

    Or, as Dr. Ken Buckle, professor emeritus at the University of New South Wales commented when our hosts took us to a seafood buffet in Abu Dhabi, I spent too much time researching pathogens in raw fish.

    He chose the cooked kind.

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control recently described a norovirus outbreak in frozen raw oysters in Seattle imported from South Korea.

    On October 19, 2011, Public Health – Seattle & King County was contacted regarding a woman who had experienced acute gastroenteritis after dining at a local restaurant with friends. Staff members interviewed the diners and confirmed that three of the seven in the party had consumed a raw oyster dish.

    Within 18–36 hours after consumption, the three had onsets of aches, nausea, and nonbloody diarrhea lasting 24–48 hours. One ill diner also reported vomiting. The four diners who had not eaten the raw oysters did not become ill.

    An inspection of a walk-in freezer at the restaurant revealed eight 3-pound bags of frozen raw oysters, which the restaurant indicated had been an ingredient of the dish consumed by the ill diners. The oysters had been imported from South Korea by company A and shipped to a local vendor, which sold them to the restaurant. All eight bags were sent to the Food and Drug Administration's Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory for norovirus testing and characterization by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR).

    A stool specimen from one of two ill diners collected 17 days after symptom onset tested positive for norovirus; sequence analysis identified GI.1 and GII.17 strains. Sequence analysis of the oysters identified a GII.3 strain. Because oysters can harbor multiple norovirus strains that are unequally amplified by rRT-PCR, discordance between stool specimens and food samples in shellfish-associated norovirus outbreaks is common and does not rule out an association. On November 4, 2011, company A recalled its frozen raw oysters.

    The frozen oysters implicated in this outbreak were distributed internationally and had a 2-year shelf-life. Contamination of similar products has been implicated previously in international norovirus transmissions. Such contamination has potential for exposing persons widely dispersed in space and time, making cases difficult to identify or link through traditional complaint-based surveillance.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Norovirus  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 7:58am by Doug Powell

    Can pathogens like E. coli or Salmonella be internalized by growing fresh produce like lettuce, spinach and tomatoes?

    Depends.

    Researchers from the University of Delaware and the U.S. Department of Agriculture report in Foodborne Pathogens and Disease that enteric pathogens localized at subsurface sites on leafy green plant tissue prevent their removal during washing and inactivation by sanitizers. Root uptake of enteric pathogens and subsequent internalization has been a large area of research with results varying due to differences in experimental design, systems tested, and pathogens and crops used.

    The potential for uptake of foodborne pathogen, both bacterial and viral, through roots into food crops is reviewed. Various factors shown to affect the ability of human pathogens to internalize include growth substrate (soil vs. hydroponic solution), plant developmental stage, pathogen genus and/or strain, inoculum level, and plant species and cultivar. Several mechanisms of internalization (“active” vs. “passive”) of bacteria to plant roots have also been hypothesized.

    The authors do conclude:

    • uptake through internalization is a plant–pathogen specific interaction;
    • the plant growth substrate used plays a large role in the uptake of both
    bacterial and viral pathogens in plants;
    • intact, healthy, non-injured roots seem to discourage the uptake of bacteria cells and viruses into plants; and,
    • generally, the presence of internalized pathogens in roots of plants does not directly correlate with internalized pathogens in the edible or foliar tissues of crops.

    The authors also note that contaminated soil, for the most part, resulted in little to no observed internalization as compared to contaminated hydroponic solution.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 7:57am by Doug Powell

    Can pathogens like E. coli or Salmonella be internalized by growing fresh produce like lettuce, spinach and tomatoes?

    Depends.

    Researchers from the University of Delaware and the U.S. Department of Agriculture report in Foodborne Pathogens and Disease that enteric pathogens localized at subsurface sites on leafy green plant tissue prevent their removal during washing and inactivation by sanitizers. Root uptake of enteric pathogens and subsequent internalization has been a large area of research with results varying due to differences in experimental design, systems tested, and pathogens and crops used.

    The potential for uptake of foodborne pathogen, both bacterial and viral, through roots into food crops is reviewed. Various factors shown to affect the ability of human pathogens to internalize include growth substrate (soil vs. hydroponic solution), plant developmental stage, pathogen genus and/or strain, inoculum level, and plant species and cultivar. Several mechanisms of internalization (“active” vs. “passive”) of bacteria to plant roots have also been hypothesized.

    The authors do conclude:

    • uptake through internalization is a plant–pathogen specific interaction;
    • the plant growth substrate used plays a large role in the uptake of both
    bacterial and viral pathogens in plants;
    • intact, healthy, non-injured roots seem to discourage the uptake of bacteria cells and viruses into plants; and,
    • generally, the presence of internalized pathogens in roots of plants does not directly correlate with internalized pathogens in the edible or foliar tissues of crops.

    The authors also note that contaminated soil, for the most part, resulted in little to no observed internalization as compared to contaminated hydroponic solution.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 7:40am by Doug Powell

    The Packer reports a series of recalls related to salmonella contamination of jalapeño peppers has left officials with the grower, South Florida Produce LLC, wondering about the federal government’s notification process.

    Leslie DiStefano, director of sales and food safety for South Florida Produce, Boynton Beach, Fla., said March 30 that the experience has been frustrating because of delays in notification about the possible contamination.

    No illnesses have been reported in connection to the jalapeños and DiStefano said that the peppers should no longer be in the supply chain.

    “We distributed a total of 500 boxes March 6 to six of our customers, who then distributed the peppers to their customers,” DiStefano said, confirming that Castellini Co. LLC, Wilder, Ky., was one of the six customers to receive the jalapeños from South Florida Produce.

    “Six days later there was a random test at a grocery store in Ohio that showed possible contamination, but we were not notified until March 20. It was our customer who notified us, not FDA. We still haven’t heard whether the contamination was confirmed.”

    The Castellini Co. issued a recall March 26 of several lots of jalapeños, expanding the recall March 29 to include more lots.

    South Florida Produce issued its own recall March 27, but the FDA did not send out notification of the grower’s recall to subscribers until March 30.

    Erica Pitchford, director of communications for the Ohio Agriculture Department said the Ohio department got tentative positive results on all three swab samples that were taken in the grocery store’s back room. She did not know if the actual jalapeños were swabbed, or if the samples were taken from boxes or other surfaces.

    On March 16, Ohio officials got laboratory confirmation that the samples were positive for salmonella.

    “We sent the information to the USDA that day,” Pitchford said. “The USDA told FDA and FDA contacted us on March 23 and told us to go back to the store to find the supplier information.”

    FDA officials did not immediately respond to inquiries about the situation.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 4:27am by Doug Powell

    At least the seeds were recalled before someone got sick – unless there are sick people and regulators aren’t saying. They also aren’t saying if the testing was done by government or the company or who knows else. Or saying where the seed originated.

    The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and Mumm's Sprouting Seeds Ltd. are warning the public not to consume the Mumm's brand Sprouting Seeds described below because the product may be contaminated withSalmonella.

    The affected product, Mumm's brand Sprouting Seeds - Sunflower, are sold in 75g packages bearing UPC 7 73295 07582 3 and lot # SF2020.

    This product is known to have been distributed in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario and may have been distributed nationally.

    There have been no reported illnesses associated with the consumption of this product.

    The importer, Mumm's Sprouting Seeds Ltd., Parkside, SK, is voluntarily recalling the affected product from the marketplace. The CFIA is monitoring the effectiveness of the recall.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 31st, 2012 - 12:43am by Doug Powell

    The New York City Health Department is investigating one confirmed and one suspect case of botulism amongst Chinese-speaking Queens residents who had recently purchased unrefrigerated fresh bulk tofu from the same store in Flushing.

    This kind of tofu, commonly sold in an open, water-filled bin, is highly suspected to be the source of these cases; however it has not yet been confirmed.

    WABC reports the tofu was not made at this store, and its source is still under investigation.

    As the investigation continues, the Health Department is advising all individuals to discard all fresh bulk tofu purchased from any New York City store that has been kept at room temperature at the time of purchase.

    The Health Department is also warning consumers to throw away tofu that has not been stored in a refrigerator at home.

    Cooking this type of tofu is not a definite safeguard against botulism; the organism's spores can still remain in the tofu and, if the tofu is improperly handled, the spores can produce a toxin that causes illness.

    New York City has seen only one other case of foodborne botulism in the past 15 years.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: March 30th, 2012 - 10:08pm by Doug Powell

    About 20 people who ate at Cebolla's Mexican Grill in Fort Wayne, Indiana on Sun. March 25 have reported symptoms of illness consistent with a norovirus outbreak.

    The Fort Wayne-Allen County Department of Health is investigating and said management of Cebolla’s is fully cooperating with health officials. The restaurant voluntarily closed on Thursday to thoroughly clean and disinfect. Any employees who have been sick recently will be tested for infection and excluded from work.

    For more information, visit www.allencountyhealth.comor call 449-7561.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Norovirus  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 30th, 2012 - 7:06pm by Doug Powell

    The number of suspected cases of cryptosporidium linked with Duluth’s Edgewater Resort and Water Park has risen to 41, a state official said on Thursday.

    Meanwhile, a second outbreak of cryptosporidiosis has been linked to a water park in the Brainerd area, the Lodge at Brainerd Lakes.

    Trisha Robinson, an epidemiologist for the Minnesota Department of Health, said it wasn’t a surprise that the number of suspected cases linked to the Edgewater grew from the six that were listed when reports became public Tuesday. It is believed that for every confirmed case in a crypto outbreak, there are 98.6 additional cases, Robinson has said.

    The number of confirmed cases remained at three on Thursday. Robinson said it’s probable that some, but not all, of the suspected cases eventually will be confirmed as crypto.

    The outbreak of the same illness linked to the Lodge at Brainerd Lakes so far is not as extensive as the Edgewater outbreak, Robinson said. As of Thursday, one case had been confirmed and 14 cases were suspected.

    Robinson, whose specialties include crypto, said she typically investigates between one and three outbreaks of the disease each year. To have two outbreaks occur simultaneously is “unprecedented,” she said.

    All of the people who became ill in the Duluth outbreak had spent time at the Edgewater Resort’s water park sometime in March. The victims included children and adults and residents of Minnesota and Wisconsin.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: March 30th, 2012 - 6:56pm by Doug Powell

    At this time of year it’s usually chicks and ducklings and Salmonella, but why not throw some turtles into the mix. Again.

    I still regret cuddling up to my pet turtle, but what did I know?

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reports a total of 66 persons infected with outbreak strains of Salmonella Sandiego, Salmonella Pomona, and Salmonella Poona have been reported from 16 states; 11 ill persons have been hospitalized, and no deaths have been reported; 55% of ill persons are children 10 years of age or younger.

    Results of the epidemiologic and traceback investigations indicate exposure to turtles or their environments (e.g., water from a turtle habitat) is the cause of this outbreak.

    Turtles with a shell length of less than 4 inches in size should not be purchased or given as gifts.

    CDC is collaborating with public health officials in multiple states to investigate three overlapping, multistate outbreaks of human Salmonella infections linked to exposure to turtles or their environments (e.g., water from a turtle habitat). The first is an outbreak of human Salmonella Sandiego infections, the second is an outbreak of human Salmonella Pomona infections, and the third is an outbreak of human Salmonella Poona infections. These are rare types of Salmonella.

    The Salmonella Sandiego and Salmonella Pomona outbreaks have similar geographic distributions, with cases occurring in the Northeast and Southwest. The Salmonella Poona outbreak has a slightly different geographic distribution, with cases occurring in the Midwest and Southwest. Public health investigators are using the PulseNet system to identify cases of illness that may be part of these outbreaks. In PulseNet, the national subtyping network of public health and food regulatory agency laboratories coordinated by CDC, DNA "fingerprints" of Salmonella bacteria are obtained through diagnostic testing with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, or PFGE, to identify cases of illness that may be part of this outbreak.

    Contact with reptiles (such as turtles, snakes, and lizards) and amphibians (such as frogs and toads) can be a source of human Salmonella infections. Small turtles, with a shell length of less than 4 inches, are a well-known source of human Salmonella infections, especially among young children. Because of this risk, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned the sale and distribution of these turtles since 1975. Amphibians and reptiles can carry Salmonella germs and still appear healthy and clean. Salmonella germs are shed in their droppings and can easily contaminate their bodies and anything in areas where these animals live. Reptiles and amphibians that live in tanks or aquariums can contaminate the water with germs, which can spread to people.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 30th, 2012 - 8:02am by Doug Powell

    pink.slime_.daily_.show_.jpeg

     Dude it’s beef.

    That’s the slogan Midwestern governors came with to a press conference after a tour of the Beef Products Inc. plant in Nebraska yesterday, much like the background audience at a Today Show taping on the streets outside 30 Rock.

    It’s beef, but is it meat?

    The safety of pink slime, or lean finely textured beef, and the operations of BPI don’t seem to be in question: choice, right-to-know, and what constitutes meat are in play.

    Food safety type Michael Batz and others have noted the original beef was whether this beef constituted an adulterated product. According to the regs Batz found, there are nine definitions for meat that is considered “adulterated.” One states, “If any valuable constituent has been in whole or in part omitted or abstracted therefrom; or if any substance has been substituted, wholly or in part therefor; or if damage or inferiority has been concealed in any manner; or if any substance has been added thereto or mixed or packed therewith so as to increase its bulk or weight, or reduce its quality or strength, or make it appear better or of greater value than it is.”

    I don’t know. Others can inform on that one. But the PR goes on, laying bare the bicoastal political landscape of the U.S.

    Meatingplace.com reports that during an emotionally charged 45-minute news conference that followed a media tour of a Beef Products Inc. plant in South Sioux City, Neb., governors from beef-producing states alternately appealed to and browbeat the media on its coverage of lean finely textured beef.

    Nancy Donley, president of STOP Foodborne Illness, whose 6-year-old son died of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome caused by eating an undercooked hamburger said she was there to “stand tall and in support of our dear friends Eldon and Regina Roth” and their company. She praised BPI’s food safety innovations in keeping the types of pathogens that killed her son out of meat products. “These folks save lives.”

    Gov. Rick Perry (Texas) asked ABC News Senior National Correspondent Jim Avila to justify his news reporting which is seen by many as a tipping point in media and social media coverage that led to food retailers and school districts rejecting the product, even though it has never been implicated in a consumer illness.

    Avila at first refused to answer, but later pointed out that ABC had never reported that the product was unsafe, but focused on the fact that ground beef products were not labeled to indicate the presence of LFTB. To this point, many of the speakers said the product is simply beef and not a filler or an additive.

    The emotional pinnacle of the event came when Avila questioned Donley on her organization accepting financial donations from BPI.

    Donley said STOP Foodborne Illness has been grateful to BPI’s support “with no strings attached.” She said BPI has never asked her “for anything — ever.” Her voice shook as she said, “No price can be put on my son’s head. I cannot be bought,” to a round of applause.

    Gary Acuff, director, Center for Food Safety Texas A&M University addressed the ammonium hydroxide pathogen intervention BPI uses by noting ammonia is used as a leavening agent, in coffee creamers and in chocolate products. He said tofu contains about four times the ammonia that LFTB does.

    Acuff also noted that recovering the extra beef from each animal that is made possible by BPI’s process is a sustainability issue. By some estimates, it would take an additional 1.5 million head of cattle to produce the beef that will be lost if the product is no longer in the market. Gov. Perry said the process extracts 10 to 12 extra pounds of beef from each carcass.

    Gov. Terry Branstad (Iowa), who yesterday announced he had convinced Hy-Vee supermarkets to return to carrying products with LFTB, said he planned to engage every other major supermarket chain in similar conversations.

    How many scientists wouldn’t have loved that level of government and individual support with technologies such as rBST, genetic engineering and irradiation?

    The complete press conference can be found at
    http://www.livestream.com/argus_leader_tv/video?clipId=pla_93f78142-699e-44cf-ab00-62f4e864a162.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 30th, 2012 - 6:01am by Doug Powell

    Press release before publication. Again.

    And it seems to plague stories about dishrags or dishcloths or sponges or whatever they’re called; those things used to wipe up stuff in the kitchen.

    In 1995, the front-page of Toronto’s Globe and Mail screeched, “Warning: your kitchen dishrag is a killer. … you probably handle an unimaginably dangerous collection of harmful bacteria" while going about your kitchenly chores, and that "90 per cent of food-related illness in the home could be prevented by using paper towels when preparing foods, especially meats."

    That was Dec. 1995. The paper describing the research was eventually published in 1997.

    Today, Safefood Ireland sent out a strinkingly similar press release with strikingly similar flaws.

    And the Irish Examiner went with a similar lede.

    A total of 27% of household dishcloths were found to contain the raw meat bacterium E. Coli, in a recent study.

    According to research from Safefood, listeria was also present on 14% of cloths analyzed by scientists.

    The research shows that although one-third of consumers who re-use dishcloths clean them in bleach and almost one in four wash them by hand, neither method is effective at removing the germs that cause food poisoning.

    Safefood is reminding people that cloths must be cleaned in a washing machine on a temperature of least 30 degrees or else boiled for 15 minutes to effectively kill germs.

    I’m not sure of the validity of those statements: Safefood cites some research, but it doesn’t appear to have been published anywhere; and if it has, PR 101 would be to include the reference on the press release.

    Instead the PR contained this:

    References:
    1. ‘Assessment of the ability of dishcloths to spread harmful bacteria to other kitchen surfaces and determination of the effectiveness of various dishcloth cleaning regimes’. safefood/Prof David McDowell; University of Ulster; Jordanstown
    2. ‘The microbiological status or household dishcloths and associated consumer hygiene practices’. safefood/ Eolas International, 2011

    There's lots of research out there, but the information presented in this press release is difficult to assess. What is the quantitative difference between rinsing a cloth or sponge before use, and the dishwasher? Were the numbers derived from self-reported responses or actual observation (people lie)? Can the actual risk of cross-contamination from such cloths be modeled in a risk assessment?

    When I use a sponge or dishcloth, I habitually rinse it first, which does not eliminate but may reduce bacterial loads. Dish clothes and towels get swapped out 1-2 times a day, and sponges go in the dishwasher about every third day. When dealing with raw meat, the sponges or clothes are swapped out immediately. Pete Snyder makes similar recommendations.

    The 1995 killer-dishrag story met the primary goal of its creators: to sell more sponges. Specifically, anti-bacterial sponges manufactured by 3M Co. of Minneapolis, Minn.

    Dr. Charles P. Gerba, an environmental microbiologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson, was contracted by 3M to perform tests of household dishrags and sponges in five U.S. cities and compare the results to the 3M sponge. Dr. Gerba found about 100 times more bacteria in dishrags retrieved from households.

    Then the public relations firm hired by 3M peddled the results, taking Dr. Gerba on a five-city tour to release the results. That was in Aug. 1995. Several stories appeared on the U.S. wire services. Why the Globe decided to run the story at the end of Dec. 1995 remains a mystery.

    Some may argue the end justifies the means, that any message promoting the safe handling of food in the kitchen is good. Except that stories which overstate a risk have been shown to do more harm than good. It's called the boomerang effect. If a message is oversold or overstated, people stop believing. With killer sponges, the message is more harmful than the bacteria; unless properly validated.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 30th, 2012 - 5:15am by Doug Powell

    Uh-huh.

    Members of the Nova Scotia Agriculture Department (that’s a province in Canada) told the public accounts committee no one in Nova Scotia has become ill because of problems in the province’s meat inspection program.

    The Herald News reports the health types were there to give an update on their response to a report from the auditor general in November that said the department wasn’t doing a good job keeping watch over the province’s slaughterhouses and meat processing plants.

    In the report, Jacques Lapointe said, among other things, there was a lack of monthly inspections and inconsistent followups when deficiencies were found, and there didn’t seem to be any enforcement action taken when deficiencies weren’t corrected.

    Mike Horwich, the director of food protection with the department, told the committee, "We’ve accepted all the recommendations (of the auditor general) and we’re working toward each and every one of them. Some are further along than others, but we hope to implement them by at least the end of next year."

    He described the system that prevents bacteria from getting through the slaughter process and into the consumer food supply as a series of fences along a track, and said that even if something happened that allowed the bacteria to get past one barrier, it would be stopped by another.

    He said the department is working toward having regular monthly inspections. "We strive to achieve those, but again, those monthly inspections are just one barrier, they’re not the be-all and end-all. We are confident that the system that we have now and the process that we have now, with inspectors on site, ends up being part of a system that produces a really good product."

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 29th, 2012 - 8:10pm by Doug Powell

    On March 22, 2005, Anna Ayala claimed she found a finger in a bowl of chili at a San Jose Wendy’s restaurant. The finger became the talk of the Internet and late-night talk shows, spawned numerous bizarre tips and theories about the source of the finger, and led to dozens of copycat claims. Wendy’s lost tens of millions of dollars.

    Turns out the finger belonged to a co-worker of Ayala’s husband who severed it during a construction accident and was planted in the chili in a misguided attempt to extort money from Wendy’s.

    In Jan. 2006, Ayala, 40, was sentenced to nine years; the hubby got more than 12 years.

    There’s a fine line between legitimate food complaints and food fraud. And Wendy’s can expect more now that it has risen to the number two fast-food outlet, finally passing Burger King and trailing McDonald’s.

    KJCT8.com reports a Delta, Colorado, woman says a maggot she found inside the fast-food she ordered Saturday has her worried about the cleanliness of the restaurant it came from. It apparently happened at a local Wendy's restaurant where Angelica Flores Jensen says she found something crawling around in her fries.

    "It was a little maggot in my fries," she described. "I don't even know if we ate any on our way home. It was just really disgusting."

    "All I've heard in return is how sorry they are," she said. "But I want to see something being done. It's really unsanitary and who knows what's going on in [the store]."

    We had a chance to talk to the restaurant's general manager. He deflected the responsibility. "One thing that I kind of am obsessed with is cleanliness," he said. "We don't think it came from us."

    "We called the health department, we called Orkin," he listed. "They were here and checked us out."

    Any and all complaints – real or alleged – must be treated seriously and respectfully. It may be unfair, but it’s part of any public activity, like selling food.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 29th, 2012 - 5:03pm by Doug Powell

    Political fodder is comedic gold.

    Satirists, like others, also eat.

    Jon Stewart loves cheeseburgers.

    The ingredients of public outrage over pink slime melded like a savory stew last night on the Daily Show to produce a potpourri of insights on how not to chat with people who eat.

    And it was so easy because the politicians and industry seem so hapless.

    U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack and Iowa Governor Terry Branstad held a press conference in Des Moines Wednesday afternoon to address concerns and educate the public about the processing of lean, finely textured beef, or LFTB.

    "That's why we're going to have people from Iowa State University and Texas A&M and knowledgeable people from USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) counter the smear and counter the misinformation with the facts," said Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad.

    Facts are never enough. Otherwise rBST would be routinely used in dairy production, genetically-engineered foods would be flaunted not shunned, and irradiation would make pink slime redundant.

    Science is never enough in the public arena.

    Vilsack, a former Iowa governor, said education is especially important when a growing number of people are increasingly farther removed from agriculture.

    "The reality is a very small percentage of America's population produces 85% to 90% of what we consume.”

    I’m not sure what being a beef farmer has to do with meat processing that involves centrifuges.

    Stewart reasoned, "any food can be disgusting if you take its ingredients out of context." Perhaps the same thing was true of pink slime burgers?

    Stewart cut to an animated news report that explained the process for making pink slime: Waste trimmings are gathered, simmered at low heat to make it easier to separate fat from muscle, then put into a centrifuge, sprayed with ammonia gas to kill bacteria, compressed into bricks, flash-frozen and finally shipped to grocery stores nationwide, where it's added to ground beef. Yummy!

    He also expressed his admiration for the beef industry's preferred nomenclature, "lean, finely textured beef." "It makes it sound like something rich beef-eaters can buy from Hammacher Schlemmer," Stewart said. "It’s the cashmere of beef."

    Stewart also marveled at the irony of pink slime: "McDonald's doesn't think it's an appropriate thing to eat? These are the people who molded a pork disc into a rib-shaped sandwich ... that contains no ribs. Nobody knows how they did it! But this stuff, pink slime? That's too fake for McDonald's?"

    I can provide references for everything I say – that educating people is about the worst communications strategy because it invalidates and trivializes people’s thoughts. But that stuff is boring.

    Stewart says the same thing but in a way that is much more entertaining.

    Whenever a group says the public needs to be educated about food safety, biotechnology, trans fats, organics or anything else, that group has utterly failed to present a compelling case for their cause. Individuals can choose to educate themselves about all sorts of interesting things, but the idea of educating someone is doomed to failure. And it’s sorta arrogant to state that others need to be educated; to imply that if only you understood the world as I understand the world, we would agree and dissent would be minimized.

    Or as Stewart said, “You got rid of it because we found out it was pink slime.”

    Proponents of pink slime or any other technology shouldn’t expect consumers to roll over and accept it. They need to promote, brag and saturate microbial food safety claims in the marketplace. Otherwise, any farmer, processor or restaurant can be held hostage by a mere accusation – regardless of the science.

    Shoppers will support honest information, instead of being told they have to become better educated about someone else’s limited perspective.

    The Daily Show segment is available for U.S. viewers at http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-march-28-2012/march-28--2012---pt--2.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: March 29th, 2012 - 2:05pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Camping wasn't a big part of my youth. My mom's idea of camping (or roughing it as she calls it) was a hotel that didn't have a working air conditioner.  When I was a teenager we went camping a couple of times and rented a trailer in a campground beside Darien Lake (a Western New York amusement park). Most of my camping time was spent chasing girls around the park and riding roller coasters. I camped a few more times in high school - which really just meant underage drinking in the woods. And it always rained.

    Last fall I was asked by a local boy scout troop to come talk about food safety on camping/canoe trips. I admitted early on about my lack of camping experience - and kept their attention with stories about barf and diarrhea. I also gave out candy. Gotta know your audience.

    According to the New Zealand Herald, a camping experience has left at least 30 kiwi students and parents with some sort of gastro illness following a camping trip.

    A school trip to Omatua Camp, near Rissington in Hawkes Bay, has resulted in about half the 30 youngsters and even some parents getting ill.

    The school's assistant principal Jane Taylor said the group arrived at the camp on Wednesday last week but days later the sickness kicked in. A second planned school visit to the camp was cancelled as a result.

    "They [health inspectors] advised us not to go until they had identified the cause of the illness," Ms Taylor said.

    The Hawke's Bay District Health Board's Medical Officer of Health Lester Calder said health protection officers were presently carrying out tests to find what sparked the outbreak of gastroenteritis.

    While the cause of the outbreak was a mystery at this stage, health inspection officers were adopting a precautionary approach by investigating the drinking water supply at the camp, and providing advice about improvements which may be needed for better drinking water protection.

    I guess it wasn't just the lack of coffee, nice beds and air conditioning my mom was worried about - maybe she was trying to avoid foodborne illness.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: March 29th, 2012 - 9:26am by Doug Powell

    Lawyers, prepare your briefs.

    And put on clean ones.

    The New York Post reports on Gotham’s burgeoning food porn trend to consume meat raw, and lining up for the privilege.

    Takashi is one of a small but growing number of restaurants around the city catering to those who are rah-rah about consuming their animal flesh raw-raw.

    The first dish to come out is the yooke, ground chuck prepared like a Japanese version of steak tartare. Topped with a raw quail egg, it’s adorned with Japanese seaweed and an enormous shiso leaf.

    It’s also by far the tamest uncooked dish at Takashi, which gets its meat from some of the better purveyors around, such as Dickson’s Farmstand and Pat LaFrieda.

    Maybe they have those CSI UV goggles that make dangerous bacteria visible. Otherwise, it’s hucksterism to charge a premium.

    “Raw meats or undercooked foods leave you at risk of infection [of parasites or a slew of other illnesses],” says Dr. Michael Mansour of the division of infectious diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital.

    According to NYC’s Department of Health, restaurants must notify diners when food isn’t cooked to required temperatures — either verbally or by printing this on the menu. A diner may also request such a dish. Basically, it’s buyer beware — though the DOH says it will investigate complaints of people getting sick from eating raw food. But with so many New Yorkers obsessed with high-quality ingredients, meat so fresh it can be served raw is seen as a benchmark — not a danger.

    Food porn trumps.

    At downtown’s Acme, you’ll find endive leaves stuffed with a mix of raw bison and sweet shrimp. At Manzo in Eataly, Piedmontese beef is hand-cut and ground to order. Hakata Tonton, just a couple of blocks from Takashi, offers veal liver sashimi on its menu, as does EN Japanese Brasserie on Hudson Street. Last fall, Hecho en Dumbo in the East Village offered venison tartare on the chef’s menu. (It plans to bring it back next fall, too.)

    And then there’s raw chicken, a dish not for the squeamish. “There are a lot of places in the city that serve raw chicken,” says Dave Pasternack, chef-owner of Esca in Hell’s Kitchen. But you might have to ask, with a nudge and a wink, to go off the menu.

    For some, raw meat is uncontroversial. “It’s my soul food,” says Takashi’s Inoue, who grew up in Osaka. “That’s how we eat in my home in Japan. The meat is very, very fresh.”

    Very fresh, except when it sickens and kills, like it did in Japan last year, leaving four dead and at least 70 sickened with E. coli O111 from raw beef.

    Pick your poison.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: March 29th, 2012 - 7:35am by Doug Powell

    A city council committee was told Monday that Dallas has all of 15 sanitarians on hand -- eight fewer than in 2007. The boom in food trucks and seasonal feeder programs, whatever those are, has resulted in a 300 per cent increase in the number of locations requiring inspection since 2009.

    Jimmy Martin, the Director for Code Compliance responsible for inspecting Dallas County bars and restaurants told the committee that only 20 percent of food establishments received two inspections in the last fiscal year, and 241 locations had not been inspected for more than two years.

    But the bigger problem was inadequate staffing: nine employees have quit in recent months, and most of those positions remain open.

    The last time the city put out the call for sanitarians they got three applications -- and the one person offered a job said no.

    James Childers, the Assistant Director, told the committeee three weeks ago that six offers had been extended to new inspectors, but low salaries had drawn an under-qualified applicant pool. It turns out that the $17 to $25 an hour Dallas County is offering prospective candidates to deal with the area's largest and most understaffed restaurant inspection program is a less than attractive offer.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)