December 2011

  • Posted: December 3rd, 2011 - 5:53am by Doug Powell

    By March 2009, 529 diners had become sick with norovirus from raw oysters served by Fat Duck proprietor and pseudo-celebrity, Heston Blumenthal.

    From the beginning of the outbreak, Blumenthal blamed others – especially the suppliers – failing to recognize that as owner and chef, he determines what is served, and his business, with consumers who fork over hundreds of pounds for a meal, is based almost entirely on trust.

    When health-types noted a number of staff were working while sick, Blumenthal employed the but-we-have-a-manual defense, which is nothing more than an invitation for more derision.

    When Blumenthal did finally issue an apology on September 25, 2009—seven months after the outbreak was discovered and more than two weeks after the U.K. Health Protection Agency issued a report on the outbreak—it suggested that he viewed an empathetic apology as an admission of guilt.

    "I am relieved to be able to finally offer my fullest apologies to all those who were affected by the outbreak at the Fat Duck,” said Blumenthal, “It was extremely frustrating to not be allowed to personally apologise (sic) to my guests until now. It was devastating to me and my whole team, as it was to many of our guests and I wish to invite them all to return to the Fat Duck at their convenience [for a free meal]."

    The apology was too late and again failed to accept responsibility for the aspects of the outbreak that were under the chef’s control—namely, acquiring seafood from unsafe sources and allowing sick employees to handle food.

    Television presenter Jim Rosenthal, who was sickened, called Blumenthal’s response, “pathetic.”



    “He has basically attempted to re-write the HPA report and its conclusions in his favour. It is pathetic and a complete PR disaster. There isn’t even a hint of apology."

    Last week, investigators published the results of the investigation in a peer-reviewed journal, Epidemiology and Infection.

    According to the paper, HPA received notification of four individuals who had developed symptoms of diarrhea and vomiting on Feb. 25, 2009, after a local health authority received notification from private consultants late on Feb. 24, 2009. The consultants had apparently been hired by the restaurant in mid-Feb. to review its food safety management system following complaints from diners.

    The restaurant voluntarily closed Feb. 22, 2009, but didn’t bother telling health types until late Feb. 24 – and it was the consultants who notified investigators. By this time, 66 complaints of illness had been received by the restaurant, although no one had contacted the health department (because most people don’t know to contact the health department in suspected foodborne illness cases).

    Not telling health-types there is an outbreak going on and hoping it will go away reflects serious misgivings with upper – and the upperist – management.

    Abstract below.

    A large foodborne outbreak of norovirus in diners at a restaurant in England between January and February 2009
    Epidemiology and Infection 01.dec.11, FirstView Article : pp 1-7
    A. J. Smith, N. McCarthy, L. Saldana, C. Ihekweazu, K. McPhedran, G. K. Adak, M. Iturriza-Gomara, G. Bickler and É. O'Moore
    http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8446062
    SUMMARY
    An outbreak of gastroenteritis affected at least 240 persons who had eaten at a gourmet restaurant over a period of 7 weeks in 2009 in England. Epidemiological, microbiological, and environmental studies were conducted. The case-control study demonstrated increased risk of illness in those who ate from a special ‘tasting menu’ and in particular an oyster, passion fruit jelly and lavender dish (odds ratio 7·0, 95% confidence interval 1·1–45·2). Ten diners and six staff members had laboratory-confirmed norovirus infection. Diners were infected with multiple norovirus strains belonging to genogroups I and II, a pattern characteristic of molluscan shellfish-associated outbreaks. The ongoing risk from dining at the restaurant may have been due to persistent contamination of the oyster supply alone or in combination with further spread via infected food handlers or the restaurant environment. Delayed notification of the outbreak to public health authorities may have contributed to outbreak size and duration.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Norovirus  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 2nd, 2011 - 3:44pm by Doug Powell

    This is why all jugs and containers in kitchens and food service areas should be color-coded.

    One-year-olds Daniel Martin and Sophie Watkinson were rushed to hospital with injuries to mouth and throat after their sippy cups were filled from unmarked jug containing pipe cleaning fluid instead of water at a Toby’s Carvery on Ecclesall Road South, Sheffield.

    “When Daniel began to cough we were encouraging him to sip more water, which was obviously just making it worse,” said Mrs Martin, from Bury.

    “At the same time, Stuart and myself took the lids off the children’s cups. I put it to my mouth and immediately it smelt like bleach.

    “The barmaid came and said: ‘I’m really sorry, we’ve used the pipe fluid.’ I didn’t believe her at first.

    “The manager called the ambulance and gave us a bottle of the cleaner to show us and to show to the doctors.”

    Kathryn Baines, a public liability solicitor at Irwin Mitchell, said, “It beggars belief that this hazardous liquid was, as we understand it, left in a water jug without any warning or hazard signs to identify it.”

    The restaurant chain, owned by leisure group Mitchells and Butlers, said staff have been retrained in cleaning practices following the incident in May.

    A spokesman said, “We can confirm Toby Carvery has admitted liability and are currently in correspondence with Mr and Mrs Martin’s solicitors. The safety and well-being of our customers is our primary concern.”

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 2nd, 2011 - 3:28pm by Doug Powell

    On March 22, 2005, Anna Ayala claimed she found a finger in a bowl of chili at a San Jose Wendy’s restaurant. The finger became the talk of the Internet and late-night talk shows, spawned numerous bizarre tips and theories about the source of the finger, and led to dozens of copycat claims. Wendy’s lost tens of millions of dollars.

    Turns out the finger belonged to a co-worker of Ayala’s husband who severed it during a construction accident and was planted in the chili in a misguided attempt to extort money from Wendy’s.

    In Jan. 2006, Ayala, 40, was sentenced to nine years; the hubby got more than 12 years.

    Two days ago, police in York, Pennsylvania, charged Shelby Lyn Adams, 40 (righ, exactly as shown), of York, with killing her 90-year-old grandmother, Ada Adams, by poisoning her Wendy's chili with morphine three years ago in York Township.

    The investigation lasted about three years -- set back by the lengthy gathering of scientific evidence and a change in investigators because of a promotion in 2010, said Chief Thomas Gross with York Area Regional Police.

    "The detectives did a thorough job at the scene, which was difficult
    considering the death of a 90-year-old woman with no real evidence of a disturbance," Gross said Thursday afternoon.

    Police also had to wait on autopsy and forensic results from vomit on Ada Adams' blouse, which showed the plant substances found in Wendy's chili, according to court documents.

    Gross said that suspicious family members were "very persistent in getting justice for their mother."

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 2nd, 2011 - 5:00am by Doug Powell

    Fidel Gomez — initially dubbed "Mr. Cheese" by state regulators — was issued a citation and ordered to pay a $500 fine for violating the Utah Dairy Act for producing and selling homemade queso fresco that was the source of an outbreak of Salmonella Newport in Utah going back to 2009.

    Reports have placed the number of confirmed cases between 40 and 80, but have said the unreported cases may be in the thousands.

    The news release states that Gomez was producing the cheese in his West Valley City home without the proper sanitation equipment or a license or permit. At least one Salt Lake Valley restaurant, in turn, was selling the cheese.

    The cheese probe took three years, involved a criminal investigator and extended to a fast-food franchise where Mr. Cheese’s wife worked.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 2nd, 2011 - 4:47am by Doug Powell

    Campylobacter is usually number 1 or 2 when it comes to causes of foodborne illness, so I’m having trouble with the lede from the BBC that claims over 90 per cent of cases of campy in the U.K. this year were due to people eating undercooked chicken liver pate, often at weddings.

    The Daily Mirror specifies that 90 per cent of outbreaks of campylobacter at catering venues in 2011 were linked to people eating chicken pate.

    I have no idea what the U.K. Health Protection Agency (HPA) actually said because there is nothing on their website yet, although they apparently analyzed 18 outbreaks of campylobacter in 2011 across England.

    In all, 443 people became unwell and one had to be hospitalised.

    The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has reminded caterers to cook poultry livers to prevent infection.

    Of the 18 outbreaks, 14 occurred in catering venues, and 13 of these were linked to chicken or duck liver pate.

    Seven were linked to wedding receptions at hotels, banqueting venues or public houses and six were associated with catering at other functions such as hotels, clubs and restaurants.

    The HPA found that livers used to make the parfait or pate were undercooked allowing the liver to remain pink in the center.

    The FSA issued updated advice to caterers on the safe handling and cooking of livers twice in 2010, but campylobacter outbreaks associated with the consumption of chicken liver pate have continued to occur.

    Last week, some 80 patrons nibbling on hors d’oeuvres during a fundraiser at the fancy Lowry Hotel in Manchester were sickened with campylobacter linked to the chicken pate.

    Maybe FSA should try different messages using different media, and perhaps evaluate if any of their advisories actually result in fewer sick people.

    PS: The Food Standards Agency subsequently published a statement that says:

    New figures from the Health Protection Agency (HPA) reveal that 90% of campylobacter outbreaks at catering venues were linked to undercooked chicken liver pate. Campylobacter is the most common cause of food poisoning in the UK.”

    Nice reporting BBC (state-sponsored jazz and bad pop music).

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: December 1st, 2011 - 2:43pm by Doug Powell

    Associated Press reported yesterday that horses could soon be slaughtered in the U.S. for human consumption after Congress quietly lifted a 5-year-old ban on funding horse meat inspections, and activists say slaughterhouses could be up and running in as little as a month.

    Today, Taiwanese animation house NMA released one of their signature videos to address the situation.

    Grub Street New York says things to watch for in the video are “the horse that gets zapped into a pile of money (we're pretty sure that's not how the slaughter actually happens) and the bloody Seabiscuit saddle at the French dinner table.”

    I appreciated the Canadian slaughterhouse worker in a hockey jersey prodding a horse with a hockey stick.

    Some background on the horse slaughter debate from AP; Australia also has two horse slaughterhouses.

    Slaughter opponents pushed a measure cutting off funding for horse meat inspections through Congress in 2006 after other efforts to pass outright bans on horse slaughter failed in previous years. Congress lifted the ban in a spending bill President Barack Obama signed into law Nov. 18 to keep the government afloat until mid-December.

    It did not, however, allocate any new money to pay for horse meat inspections, which opponents claim could cost taxpayers $3 million to $5 million a year. The U.S. Department of Agriculture would have to find the money in its existing budget, which is expected to see more cuts this year as Congress and the White House aim to trim federal spending.

    The USDA issued a statement Tuesday saying there are no slaughterhouses in the U.S. that butcher horses for human consumption now, but if one were to open, it would conduct inspections to make sure federal laws were being followed.

    Pro-slaughter activists say the ban had unintended consequences, including an increase in neglect and the abandonment of horses, and that they are scrambling to get a plant going - possibly in Wyoming, North Dakota, Nebraska or Missouri.

    Sue Wallis, a Wyoming state lawmaker who's the group's vice president, said ranchers used to be able to sell horses that were too old or unfit for work to slaughterhouses but now they have to ship them to butchers in Canada and Mexico, where they fetch less than half the price.

    The federal ban devastated "an entire sector of animal agriculture for purely sentimental and romantic notions," she said.

    Although there are reports of Americans dining on horse meat a recently as the 1940s, the practice is virtually non-existent in this country, where the animals are treated as beloved pets and iconic symbols of the West.

    A federal report issued in June found that local animal welfare organizations reported a spike in investigations for horse neglect and abandonment since 2007. In Colorado, for example, data showed that investigations for horse neglect and abuse increased more than 60 percent - from 975 in 2005 to almost 1,600 in 2009.

    The report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office also determined that about 138,000 horses were transported to Canada and Mexico for slaughter in 2010, nearly the same number that were killed in the U.S. before the ban took effect in 2007. The U.S. has an estimated 9 million horses.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 1st, 2011 - 1:51pm by Doug Powell

    In May, 2008, children's playgrounds were closed on Sydney's Northern Beaches after a rare form of salmonella, paratyphi B var java, normally linked to tropical fish, sickened 23 toddlers. The sand was replaced at a cost of $140,000 but subsequent testing showed the same Salmonella had returned.



    Over three years later, and once again, part of the popular children’s playground at Winnererremy Bay has been closed after testing revealed the presence of salmonella bacteria in the surface bark.

    Pittwater Council general manager Mark Ferguson said the part of the playground that tested positive would remain closed while the bark was replaced.

    Dr Michael Staff, of the Public Health Unit, who conducted the testing, said there had been no cases of gastroenteritis linked to the most recent contamination.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments