December 2011

  • Posted: December 23rd, 2011 - 12:44pm by Doug Powell

    The Mandarin Palace Restaurant in in Fredericton, New Brunswick (that’s in Canada), which was closed after rotting bear meat was discovered in a freezer, has reopened after a reinspection by Department of Health on Thursday.

    There's a note on the inspector's report that says a food course must be completed as discussed with the business owners Johnny and Tina Tu.

    "I will be reopened today," said Tu. "I am preparing everything brand new, my chicken balls and my egg rolls."

    Tu said she sat down with government investigators to discuss how and why rancid parts of a black bear were found in her restaurant's cooler. She told The Daily Gleaner she agreed to keep the bear for one of her customers, but the customer later told her to keep the bear.

    Tu didn't know what to do with it and was getting conflicting advice on how to dispose of it.

    "I hope everybody understands that I never touched the bear. I didn't eat it and I wouldn't serve it to people," Tu said.

    Tu said customers know that chicken is chicken and beef is beef.

    "They can taste. They know. There's the difference. I don't want people to be scared. I didn't touch anything with the bear," she said.

    The Health Department said the condition of the bear meat created a high risk for cross-contamination. Officials told Tu and her husband Johnny -- the restaurant's co-owners -- the cooler where the bear was stored had to be stripped bare of its contents and sanitized prior to reinspection. The department also said it would provide information on food-handling techniques and food safety.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: December 23rd, 2011 - 12:22pm by Doug Powell

    People who write with exclamation marks or IN ALL CAPS are yelling. And trying to disguise their inability to write clear, compelling sentences.

    So when Green Valley Food Corp. announced it was recalling 650 cases of “Let’s Grow Healthy Together!” Alfalfa Sprouts 5 oz. containers and proclaimed, “Till this present day there has been no related illnesses CONFIRMED because of this recall” I wondered, why are they yelling, and what does CONFIRMED mean.

    And who says, till this present day? In Texas?

    The company also wrote the Let’s Grow Healthy Together! sprouts were recalled “because the results showed to be contaminated with Salmonella, an organism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems.”

    The results weren’t contaminated; the sprouts were contaminated with salmonella.

    A table of sprout-related outbreaks is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/sprouts-associated-outbreaks.

    “Let’s Grow Healthy Together!” Alfalfa Sprouts 5 oz. containers were distributed in Texas via truck deliveries to all customers in Texas. All customers were retail chains and food distribution centers. If you are a customer affected by this recall you will be receiving a letter asking for the quantities you were shipped and their whereabouts. Please, respond as soon as possible.

    A letter? Who uses the post office in a recall situation involving fresh and perishable produce?

    The product is in a plastic container that measures 4-inch by 4-inch container that has a lid. The containers UPC number is 714722228818. The label has blue lettering that states “Let’s Grow Healthy Together!” Alfalfa Sprouts 5 oz. containers. The code date on the shipping box is an orange tag that will state the number,”3440210”. The “Let’s Grow Healthy Together!” Alfalfa Sprouts 5 oz. containers will have a white tag on the upper right hand side of the label with the date of 1/1/2012.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 23rd, 2011 - 4:45am by Doug Powell

    Cyclospora in California strawberries in 1996 was Guatemalan raspberries.

    Salmonella in tomatoes in 2008 was jalapeno peppers.

    E. coli O104 in Spanish cucumbers was organic sprout seeds from Egypt.

    Ron Doering, a past president of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency who practices food law in the Ottawa offices of Gowling Lafleur Henderson, LLP, writes in his monthly Food in Canada column that food safety regulators face “diabolical complexity when they carry out investigations characterized by deep factual and scientific uncertainty.”

    “In the later two cases, investigators were dealing with rare strains of pathogens, and traceability was complicated by the fact that the source was unpackaged vegetables — without barcodes or lot numbers — that were quickly consumed, often with other produce. Microbiological testing proved quite unhelpful so investigators had to rely primarily on epidemiology. Pressed for “results,” both cases had regula¬tors initially jumping to the wrong conclusions, destroying in their wake the livelihood of many innocent people and seriously undermining the credibility of government food safety regulators. Both cases prove the “Iron Law of Food Safety Outbreak Investigations”— after the fact academ¬ics and the media will criticize government regulators either for overreacting or under-reacting.

    “Perhaps government regulators have themselves to blame for the Iron Law because they continue to buy into the academic theory and language that they are engaged in risk management. They should be so lucky. The classical model of risk analysis falls far short in describing what reg¬ulators actually do and in providing much useful guidance on how they should do it. In both cases, regulators were not dealing with risk — a concept that surely involves at least some aspect of measuring probabilities — they were dealing with uncertainty and crisis management.

    “The language of risk disguises the degree of ambiguity inherent in large-scale food safety investigations. “Risk” creates the illusion of precision, of assessing hazards in quantitative terms, or measuring the probability of harm. Science-based quantitative expert risk assessments often disguise the underlying subjective framework of assump¬tions and understate the high degree of uncertainty. Food safety risk assessors do not do double blind laboratory studies over a long period; they generally just review the conclusions of other scientists.

    “In fact, in spite of their name, they typically do not even assess cases of risk, as calculations of probability are usually impossible to determine especially in the context of an urgent food safety crisis.

    “The most that “risk assessors” can do is assess situations of uncertainty and then engage in a complex iterative process with decision-makers to try to find ways to man¬age an immediate issue fraught with multiple perspec¬tives where the science, however uncertain, is important but rarely determinative.

    “Understanding what is going on is complicated too by everyone pretending the de¬cision is mostly science-based, unadulterated by policy considerations, and that they are managing the actual science-health risk, not the perception of risk.

    “We need to abandon the language of risk and recognize that most food safety investigations are about issue man¬agement. We need to develop a new theoretical model and language that would borrow heavily from the emerg¬ing literature on adaptive management: in the face of such uncertainty, making policy choices and implement¬ing regulatory decisions should be recognized as neces¬sarily experimental; decisions are made that expect the unexpected; policies and regulatory responses are adapted as lessons are learned.

    “The new model would also have to more fully recognize that while food safety must be paramount, trade-offs and weighing benefits are always a necessary part of the process. And this model would have to grapple with communicating this uncertainty to a generally scientifically illiterate consumer who simply expects retailers to only sell safe food and expects the regulatory system to guarantee it.”

    Doering has some valid points. I don’t care what model is used as long as there is fewer sick people. Epidemiology, like humans, is flawed. But it’s better than astrology.

    The more that public health folks can articulate when to go public and why, the more confidence in the system. Past risk communication research has demonstrated that if people have confidence in the decision-making process they will have more confidence in the decision. People may not agree about when to go public, but if the assumptions are laid on the table, and value judgments are acknowledged, then maybe the focus can be on fewer sick people.

    On June 12, 1996, Ontario, Canada's chief medical officer, Dr. Richard Schabas, issued a public health advisory on the presumed link between consumption of California strawberries and an outbreak of diarrheal illness among some 40 people in the Metro Toronto area. The announcement followed a similar statement from the Department of Health and Human Services in Houston, Texas, which was investigating a cluster of 18 cases of cyclospora illness among oil executives.

    Turns out it was Guatemalan raspberries, and no one was happy.

    Once epidemiology identifies a probable link between a food and some dangerous bug, health officials have to decide whether it makes sense to warn the public. In retrospect, the decision seems straightforward, but there are several possibilities that must be weighed at the time.

    Back in 1996, when the Ontario Ministry of Health decided to warn people that eating imported strawberries might be connected to cyclospora infection, two outcomes were possible: if it turned out that strawberries were implicated, the ministry made a smart decision, warning people against something that could hurt them; if strawberries were not implicated, then the ministry made a bad decision with the result that strawberry growers and sellers lost money and people stopped eating something that was good for them.

    If the ministry decided not to warn people, another two outcomes were possible: if strawberries were implicated, then the ministry made a bad decision and people could have acquired a parasitic infection they could have avoided had they been given the information (lawsuits usually follow); if strawberries were definitely not implicated then nothing happens, the industry does not suffer and the ministry does not get in trouble for not telling people.

    These scenarios apply to any decision to go public.

    It’s not that a new model is required – any model will do – as long as someone in some regulatory agency will put in writing the decisions involved in when to go public, with all assumptions laid bare. Then it can enter public discourse and be improved.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 22nd, 2011 - 6:53pm by Doug Powell

    “The stars are in our corners” and “Food service beyond expectation since 1960,” are the slogans of catering firm, Triple A Services Inc.

    If listeria is a star and beyond expectation.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced today that a Chicago-area company has agreed to stop making its ready-to-eat sandwiches and produce after FDA investigators repeatedly found unsanitary conditions and bacterial contamination in the facility.

    The company, Triple A Services Inc., and its owners and operators, Thomas J. Whennen, Scott C. Whennen and David A. Frisco, have agreed to stop producing and distributing the sandwiches and produce as part of a consent decree filed in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Illinois.

    The terms of the decree would also require Triple A to hire a sanitation expert to help establish an effective sanitation program, to comply with FDA regulations and to eliminate Listeria contamination from company facilities.

    The government's complaint, filed by the U.S. Department of Justice on December 22, 2011, describes Triple A's history of operating under unsanitary conditions and Listeria monocytogenes contamination in the processing facility.

    It also outlines Triple A's failure to comply with Current Good Manufacturing Practice and seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point regulations.

    "FDA took these aggressive actions because Triple A Services continued to violate current good manufacturing practice regulations and allow for conditions that could affect the health of consumers," said Dara Corrigan, the FDA's associate commissioner for regulatory affairs.

    No illnesses have been reported to date from Triple A Services' products.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Listeria  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 22nd, 2011 - 4:35pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Public health folks in the city of Hamburg are being sued for €2.3 million (about $3 million USD) after their market was damaged during an outbreak of E. coli O1O4 which was later linked to fresh sprouts. Spanish company Frunet, lodged the claim and is seeking damages for sullying the country's reputation.

    In response to the suit, according to AFP, German health authorities are supporting their summer cucumber warning,

    "The Office for Health and Consumer Protection rejects these claims since the warning about the company's cucumbers was necessary and right," the health office said in a written statement.

    Insisting it believed it had taken the right course of action in issuing a warning with the information it had at the time, it said: "Protecting health comes before economic interests of companies."

    The European Union provided €227 million in compensation for European producers of cucumbers, tomatoes, lettuce, courgettes and sweet peppers, withdrawn from the market as a result of the disease.

    This isn't a unique lawsuit, earlier this year Del Monte sued the state of Oregon following an outbreak investigation linked to their products.

    Paul Mead, of the oft-quoted Mead et al paper (76 million illnesses a year) was once cited as saying, "Food safety recalls are either too early or too late. If you're right, it's always too late. If you're wrong, it's always too early."
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: December 22nd, 2011 - 12:13pm by Doug Powell

    Crain’s New York reports that when a health-department inspector visited XES Lounge in Chelsea last month, he gave general manager Tony Juliano a ticket for having unwrapped straws on the bar. Those straws have been there for nearly eight years, but this time it was deemed a $400 violation.

    A few months earlier, inspectors cited the business for a missing “No smoking” sign in the back of the bar, which has 11 employees. “We've been open since 2004 and were never cited for that,” said Mr. Juliano.

    His frustrations echo that of many small business owners in the city, who view fines for minor offenses as punitive and feel the process for paying and contesting violations is burdensome.

    In mid-October, Marisol Chino, the owner of Tepeyac Deli & Grocery on Irving Avenue in Brooklyn, was cited for having a metal food stand outside, instead of a wooden one. “They've been inspecting me for seven years and never told me that,” she said. “They gave me the option to pay a $200 fine or fight it, but if I lose, the fine goes to $1,000.”

    A few months earlier, Ms. Chino, who is the store's only employee, received a ticket for not having the store's refund policy posted, even though she claims it was in the front window. When she brought that sign to the attention of the inspector, she said, he refused to change the citation.

    The city's public advocate, Bill de Blasio, is now getting involved after hearing from chambers of commerce, business improvement districts and small businesses at a series of roundtables he hosted earlier this year. Mr. de Blasio said businesses repeatedly mentioned the fines as among the most infuriating and time-consuming obstacles they face. His office submitted a legislative request to the City Council, the first step to introducing a bill that would allow violations from city agencies like Consumer Affairs to be contested and paid online, by mail or by phone. Fines would be differentiated more fairly between severe and low-risk violations, especially for those that don't originate from a consumer complaint. And the bill would allow business owners with first-time, low-level citations to be given a chance to correct them before being fined.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 11:37pm by Doug Powell

    Wal-Mart has pulled a batch of powdered infant formula from its stores nationwide after a newborn Missouri boy who was given the formula became gravely ill with a suspected bacterial infection and died after being taken off life support, the retailer said Wednesday.

    No government recall had been ordered for the 12.5-ounce cans of Enfamil Newborn powder with the lot number ZP1K7G. Manufacturer Mead Johnson Nutrition said its records showed the lot tested negative for the bacterium before it was shipped.

    But Wal-Mart spokeswoman Dianna Gee said the company decided to pull the lot "out of an abundance of caution" while health officials investigate Sunday's death of 10-day-old Avery Cornett. The product could go back on shelves depending on the outcome of the investigation, but customers who bought the cans have the option of returning them for a refund or exchange, Gee said.

    Gena Terlizzi, spokeswoman for the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, said Wednesday that samples of the formula given to Avery were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for testing.

    The Lebanon Daily Record reported that Avery was taken to St. John's Hospital-Lebanon late last week after appearing lethargic and displaying what his family said were signs of a stomach ache. He was later moved to St. John's Hospital-Springfield, and preliminary tests showed that he had contracted a rare bacterial infection, Cronobacter sakazakii, the newspaper reported. He died Sunday after being removed from life support.

    Avery had been fed Enfamil Newborn powder bought at a Wal-Mart store in Lebanon. The store stopped selling the product after learning of his death.

     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 10:51pm by Doug Powell

    egg.farm_.jpg

     Australia still has an egg problem.

    Two weeks after raw egg in mayonnaise made at least 22 people sick with salmonella after eating at the Silo bakery in Canberra, owners Leanne Gray and Graham Hudson say they have stopped making mayonnaise for counter sandwiches, but still make mayonnaise for dishes where it can be kept in the fridge. Silo has also changed its egg supplier.

    This will not prevent salmonella.

    And without generalizing, Australia still has an egg problem.

    Last week, four of the affected people were considering taking legal action, to claim expenses, loss of wages, and pain and suffering. State practice group leader for Slater and Gordon Gerard Rees was awaiting instructions from the four and for the final report from ACT Health, before determining whether a claim of negligence could be taken, on the basis that Silo knew or ought to have known of the likely salmonella outcome from eating raw egg.

    ''Silo is a very good cafe, as a general position it is a very popular cafe,'' Rees said. ''This is the first time I've heard of a complaint of any kind involving them, so it's not something against Silo - it's just something that has occurred ... If someone goes into a restaurant or cafe they're entitled to have food that's of an accepted standard and if they do suffer injury as a result, they're entitled to make a claim.'' Slater and Gordon would run the case on a no-win, no-fee basis.

    It isn’t something that just occurred. It’s salmonella, it’s in raw eggs.

    Hundreds of people have been sickened in Australia in the past five years from consuming undercooked eggs or dishes containing raw eggs.

    A couple of new reports from Food Standards Australia New Zealand also raise the egg issue.
    Microbiological surveys of raw egg-based products in Sydney and Western Australia cafes found no salmonella, but did find many instances of poor temperature and hygiene.

    In Sydney, a total 107 samples of raw egg products were collected from 46 premises:

    - 13 samples were classified unsatisfactory due to high standard plate counts and/or moderate levels of Bacillus cereus
    - one sample of Caesar dressing was classified potentially hazardous due to a high level of B. cereus (31,000 cfu/g)
    - Salmonella was not detected in any samples tested.

    Information on food handling, product preparation, cleaning and sanitation and egg quality was obtained from 44 premises via on-site observation and questionnaire. The results show that:

    - 10% of sauces were stored at ambient temperatures.
    - 71% of samples had a temperature greater than 5°C (and less than 60°C)—constant movement of product in and out of refrigeration may be responsible for an elevated product temperature.
    - 74% of products sampled were not date coded and 41% of products did not have a known shelf life policy at the time of inspection
    - most premises who separated eggs did so by hand; four used gloved hands and 24 used bare hands. Six premises separated eggs using the shells. In general hand washing after handling eggs was not considered as important as washing hands after handling raw chicken or meat.
    - 23% of premises had cracked or dirty eggs in storage and there seemed to be a distinct lack of knowledge about the quality of the egg, the risks associated with using cracked and dirty eggs, and the egg supplier.
    - Only 52% of the food businesses stored whole eggs under 5°C.

    Most businesses surveyed required improvement in:

    - temperature control of raw egg products during and in between use
    - date coding of raw egg products
    - egg separation technique during processing to prevent cross contamination.

    Chef Christian Hauberg told the Canberra Times that when a restaurant with the reputation of Silo is named as the source of a salmonella outbreak, Canberra's restaurateurs take a keen interest.

    ''It sent shivers up my spine, to be honest. It's the worst nightmare that people get sick from your food. But unfortunately with food-borne illnesses, you've got no idea if the product is contaminated when it comes in - you can't tell by looking at it.''

    Hauberg, from Pulp Kitchen, uses caged eggs in mayonnaise because he believes it reduces the risk of salmonella. ''I assume they're safer,'' he says, partly because free-range eggs might not be collected and refrigerated as quickly. He uses free-range eggs in cooked dishes.

    Australian National University professor of infectious diseases and microbiology Peter Collignon says sanitizing the shell would presumably substantially lower the risk, since most contamination comes from the outside of the egg, but it wouldn't deal with cases where salmonella is inside. There is no way of telling whether a chicken is carrying salmonella, and not enough data to indicate whether caged, free-range or organic chickens are more or less likely to have it, he says, advising not to eat raw or runny-yolk eggs. When he eats mayonnaise, it comes in a jar from the supermarket. When he fries an egg, he flips it to cook both sides. He believes restaurants should warn people when food is made from raw eggs.

    ''Any egg, whether it's commercial or free range, can be an issue. 'My view is whatever egg I get from whatever source, it's too hard to know, so I cook it.''

    Like lots of foodborne illness, the risk may be low, but if it can be easily prevented, why not. And as the professor says, consumers really have no way of knowing.

    Silo co-owner Leanne Gray says officials have since advised buying commercial mayonnaise or using pasteurized eggs. Her response: “That's the foulest thing you've ever seen, so I said no, I won't.''

    Bring on the lawyers.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 7:29pm by Doug Powell

    The lobby of New York City’s famed Algonquin Hotel has been surrounded with an invisible electric fence in hopes it will keep the health department happy.

    The New York Times reports an electric fence was installed in late summer after someone called 311 and the health department threatened the hotel with action: keep Matilda the cat away from food service and dining areas.

    Matilda is the latest in a long line of Algonquin cats going back to the 1930s. The first, a stray who wandered in off West 44th Street with as much elan as a famous guest, was known as Rusty or Hamlet. Since then, each cat has been succeeded by another with the same name, Hamlet for the males, Matilda for the females.

    A spokeswoman for the health department, Susan Craig, said that the letter about Matilda was “automatically generated” and that the department “did not find evidence substantiating that complaint.”

    She said that during a recent inspection, the hotel had explained the ins and outs of the electric fence “perimeter outside of the food service area to contain the cat.”

    “Our food safety inspector acknowledged this,” Ms. Craig wrote in an e-mail, “and concurred that cats should be kept out of dining, kitchen or other food-preparation areas.” For all her mentions in newspaper articles, Matilda has never been mentioned in the Algonquin’s restaurant inspection reports from the health department.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 7:09pm by Doug Powell

    The UK Food Standards Agency reports that Natco Foods is recalling certain batches of its ground cumin because some are contaminated with salmonella.

    The affected batches have a ‘best before’ date of September 2013 or October 2013. If you have bought the product don’t use it.

    The product being recalled is:
    Natco Ground Cumin, 100g jar, 100g pack, 400g pack, 1kg pack, 5kg pack
    Best before: September 2013, October 2013

    Natco has recalled the affected products from consumers and stockists. Customer notices have been displayed in stores, explaining why the product has been recalled.

    If you have bought the affected product, don’t use it. You can return it to the store for a full refund.

    No other Natco products are known to be affected.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 6:44pm by Doug Powell

    The Mandarin Palace Restaurant in Fredericton, New Brunswick (that’s in Canada) was closed after decomposing bear meat was found in a cooler during a routine inspection this week.

    The meat, found in the on Tuesday, was turned over to the Department of Natural Resources. An investigation is ongoing.

    The restaurant was closed because of concerns the bear meat could have contaminated other contents in the cooler, but the risk to public health is very low, the Department of Health said in a statement.

    An inspection record posted on the government's website said, "Food must be purchased from an approved source. Wild animals are not approved."

    The restaurant will remain closed until the cooler has been properly cleaned.

    Samples of the bear meat have been sent out to test for trichinella, a parasite that can be transmitted to humans through consumption of raw or undercooked infected bear meat.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 3:16pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Translated by Albert Amgar

    Salmonella retrouvé dans de la pâte précuite  et des torchons ont été contrôlés positifs
    75 personnes ont été atteintes de salmonellose après avoir mangé au Tenth Hole Tea Rooms à Southsea (Royaume-Uni)
    Une enquête dans une épidémie de 2009 à Salmonella Enteriditis PT8 dans un restaurant britannique a retrouvé que des mauvaises pratiques d’hygiène étaient la cause de maladies.
    Des salades préparées sur place étaient probablement la cause de l’épidémie.
    Les enquêteurs ont retrouvé que Tenth Hole Tea Rooms avait récemment changé de fournisseur de laitues (remplaçant un produit découpé par des salades entières qui devaient être lavées) et le personnel a lavé les ingrédients de la salade dans un évier qui était aussi utilisé pour laver le poulet. L’évier était correctement lavé et désinfecté entre les activités.
    Les enquêteurs ont également retrouvé que du personnel qui travaillait était malade avec une salmonellose et une rotation des employés à temps partiel au niveau des postes a augmenté le risque de contamination croisée.
    Que pouvez-vous faire :
    - Ne lavez pas la viande crue. Lors du lavage, Salmonella et d’autres microbes peuvent être répandus jusqu’à 1 mètre aux alentours.
    - Nettoyez et désinfectez tout équipement ou surface où des viandes crues ont été coupées ou manipulées ; des pathogènes peuvent persister et contaminer des aliments prêts à être consommés.
    - Le personnel malade doit rester à la maison. Des vomissements ou de la diarrhée sont souvent des symptômes de maladies d’origine alimentaire qui peuvent être transmises aux clients par du personnel malade.
    Pour plus d’informations, contactez Ben Chapman, benjamin_chapman@ncsu.edu ou Doug Powell, dpowell@ksu.edu

    Your rating: None
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 2:37pm by Doug Powell

    Three months after she was born, Kendall Paciorek is finally home, just in time for Christmas.

    The premature girl from Fishers, Ind., is one of the tiniest victims of last summer’s deadly listeria outbreak in cantaloupe, which sickened 146 people, including 30 who died.

    JoNel Aleccia of msnbc describes how Kendall (right, photo from msnbc) spent the first several weeks of her life in an incubator, fighting off an infection contracted when her mother ate tainted melon traced to Jensen Farms of Holly, Colo.

    She’s strong enough now to sleep in her own crib in the house where big sister Madison, 4, loves to color pictures of Santa.

    Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared the outbreak over this month, and the rest of the world seems poised to move on.

    But for Kendall and her family, the impact of the foodborne illness caused by a summer snack is just beginning.

    “Right now they don’t know what’s going to happen to her in the long term,” said Michelle Wakley-Paciorek, Kendall’s 41-year-old mother. “We were told she could have mental and or physical delays.”

    Kendall was one of three newborns diagnosed with listeria infections in the outbreak that largely affected the elderly, according to the CDC. Four pregnant women became ill; one had a miscarriage.

    For now, there’s no sign of serious trouble, other than the feeding tube that runs into Kendall’s stomach because the baby has had difficulty eating.

    With help, she’s gained weight, now topping 7 pounds, up from 3 pounds, 11 ounces when she arrived suddenly on Sept. 21.

    That was a week after the federal Food and Drug Administration announced a voluntary recall of the entire crop of fresh, whole cantaloupe from Jensen Farms.

    But for Kendall and her mom, it was already too late.

    “We’re thinking I ate cantaloupe sometime in the first three to four weeks of August,” Wakley recalled. “I ate it probably multiple times. You try to eat better because you’re pregnant.”

    Wakley never became violently ill. Instead, she suffered headaches, muscle aches, fever and chills for several weeks before she started having contractions during a pedicure.

    “I couldn’t even believe I was in labor,” said Wakley, who was rushed to an emergency department and given drugs to halt delivery.

    Despite the effort, Kendall was born hours later, but so small and sick that doctors feared for her life.

    Blood tests later revealed that both mother and baby were infected with listeria later traced to the tainted Colorado cantaloupe.

    The months since then have been a blur of hospital rooms, doctors’ visits and worried conversations about Kendall’s future.

    “You almost panic because they tell you about all kinds of learning disabilities and other problems,” she said. “It’s been like an emotional roller-coaster.”

    It’s not clear whether Wakley can continue working, or whether she’ll need to quit her job to care for Kendall and her sister full-time. Her husband, Dave Paciorek, 41, is a senior manager at Federal Express.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Listeria  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 2:20pm by Doug Powell

    The last thing people need from any agency is another list of tips to protect consumers from foodborne illness.

    Salmonella in jalapeno’s, E. coli in leafy greens and strawberries, listeria in cantaloupes. These are not consumer issues. The only thing consumers can do is to avoid such products. But with no marketing of food safety at retail, shoppers really can’t choose until long after defective foodstuffs are publicized and recalled.

    Faith-based food safety.

    So when U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius is reduced to reciting meaningless clichés to describe food safety achievements in the Obama administration -- “We have the safest food supply in the world, but we can always do more to protect consumer” -- they’ve thrown in the towel.

    The feds are also going to refocus on consumer education, whatever that means.

    As some smart policy wonk (not an oxymoron, in this specific case) told me 25 years ago, when politicians talk about educating people, things have really gone off the rails.

    As part of clear consumer education and communication, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today issued a progress report highlighting the accomplishments and strategies of President Obama’s Food Safety Working Group (FSWG) combined with useful information for consumers on safe food handling.

    Who said the information was useful? Was the information evaluated? Were consumers asked if they thought the information was useful? Did anyone test to see if this useful information translated into food safety behavioral change? Or is useful just some characterization thrown in by a PR flunky.

    “As families across the country share in this holiday season, it is important to reiterate our commitment to protecting the food supply and our desire to remain vigilant to protect the American people,” said Secretary Vilsack. “We have taken a number of steps to improve the safety of America’s meat and poultry supply in recent years and the President’s Food Safety Working Group has proven to be a vital component to our work.”

    Yes, the full report highlights a number of accomplishments. Most of these are good. But when the “FSWG also plans to continue its efforts to improve food safety by collaborating more with state and local health and agriculture agencies, and food producers, as well as providing education to consumers” in the absence of any science or data to support such information provision, they’ve thrown in the towel.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 4:28am by Doug Powell

    EKO Australia Pty Ltd is recalling batches of their imported noodles sold in NSW in specialty Asian grocery stores.

    The batches are being recalled because of the presence of Bacillus cereus, a harmful bacteria.
    The recalled products are:

    • Kamfen Buckwheat Noodles in 340g plastic bag with 'best before' date 2013.04.15
    • Kamfen Beijing Noodles, Abalone Chicken Soup Flavour in 160g plastic bag, with 'best before' date 2013.01.15
    • Kamfen Sichuan Noodles, Abalone Chicken Soup Flavour in 160g plastic bag, with 'best before' date 2013.01.15

    The recall applies only to the above batches of the products and dates.

    Consumers should not consume the products. Consumers can return the products to the place of purchase for a refund.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 3:24am by Doug Powell

    The Canadian Food Inspection Agency is warning the public not to consume the jalapeno peppers described below because they may be contaminated with salmonella.

    The affected fresh jalapeno peppers, imported from the U.S., were sold as follows:

    1. Unlabelled from bulk at Safeway stores and various independent grocery stores in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Ontario, Saskatchewan and Yukon, between December 3 and 20, 2011, inclusively.

    2. Unlabelled from bulk or in 4.5 kg Cal Fresco brand cases at Loblaws banners (Extra Foods, No Frills, Real Canadian Wholesale Club, Shop Easy, SuperValu, Real Canadian Superstore, Lucky Dollar and Your Independent Grocer) in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, between December 3 and 20, 2011, inclusively.

    Consumers who have purchased bulk, unlabelled jalapeno peppers are advised to check with their place of purchase to determine if they have the affected product.

    There have been no reported illnesses associated with the consumption of these peppers.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 3:11am by Doug Powell

    Canberra’s food safety inspection regime is being undermined by poor record keeping, staff shortages and a “reactive” approach to enforcing hygiene standards in the city’s restaurants, according to an Auditor General’s report.

    The Canberra Times reports the auditor also found that ACT Health had no policies or procedures in place to respond to foodborne illness outbreaks, despite having to cope with four outbreaks, on average, annually between 2004 and 2009.

    Auditor General Maxine Cooper found that there had been a “sharp” 30 per cent decline in scheduled inspections for food businesses and that the Health Protection Service had been unable to achieve its own targeted for the number or frequency of inspections.

    At one point early in 2011, the agency was forced to hire contractors to cover gaps in the ranks of its inspectors so it could carry on checking the compliance of the city’s restaurants.

    In some cases, the audit found, the records kept by the Health Protection Service were not even good enough for auditors to form a view on the agency’s performance.

    “There are shortcomings in the regulation and administration of food safety that need to be addressed to provide the community with assurance that the food they buy and eat is safe,” the Auditor General concluded.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: December 20th, 2011 - 10:26pm by Doug Powell

    Sandra Bullock wouldn’t stand a chance against the AQIS beagles.

    Australia has an impressive quarantine and inspection service for folks arriving to the island. So do lots of countries. The reason is that people want their nostaligic food, but have no concept of the consequences of disease introduction; think foot and mouth disease in the UK, which was ultimately linked to some overseas food eventually fed to pigs.

    People magazine, for those who can’t get enough of celebrities, artists and athletes who should focus on their craft instead of speaking, reports that Sandra Bullock's Christmas dinner involves illegally importing sausages from Germany to continue a meal tradition started by the actress's mother.

    "Since my mother passed, we break the law, because we have to manage to smuggle German sausages into the country, and apparently bringing meats across the waters is against the law," Bullock, 47, told Jay Leno during an appearance on The Tonight Show. "You fry 'em up with some sauerkraut and potato salad, but they have to be the right ones."

    Bullock said her family sends out an "SOS" to a handful of loved ones overseas to send the meats over to the U.S.

    "We just have to break the law a little bit, but eventually someone's package gets through," she told Leno.

    When pressed about the method, Bullock said with a smirk: "I'm not at liberty to divulge how we smuggle the sausage."

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Celebrity  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 20th, 2011 - 9:58pm by Doug Powell

    Patrons of the Fruitti Yogurt in Goldsboro, N.C. are being advised to receive a free protective shot against hepatitis A.

    The Wayne County Health Department says anyone who ate at the 317 Spence Ave. restaurant on Dec. 7 needs to visit a free clinic at 301 North Herman St.

    The exposure might have occurred on Dec. 7 because of an infection in an employee who was diagnosed on Dec. 14.

    The hepatitis A vaccine reduces the risk of the disease when given within 14 days of exposure.

    If you’ve been previously vaccinated, no worries.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Hepatitis A  |  Comments
  • Posted: December 20th, 2011 - 8:38pm by Doug Powell

    Fox News reports Chicago’s Alinea was given the Michelin Guide’s coveted three-star rating last month, the only Chicago restaurant to earn that top honor, but later in the month it failed an inspection by the City of Chicago's food protection division.

    Violations included foods at improper temperatures, employees not able to wash their hands properly, black mold growth inside an ice machine, and the front door was cited as not being insect or rodent-proof.

    More food safety, less food porn.

    That failing inspection report was listed as taking place on Nov. 30th. One week later, on Dec. 8, the restaurant was re-inspected and received a passing grade.

    The second report did still mention a few issues, such as ventilation equipment that was needed, but it was a passing grade.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Celebrity  |  Comments