September 2010

  • Posted: September 8th, 2010 - 5:07am by Doug Powell

    Lady Gaga graces the September cover of Vogue Hommes Japan wearing an ensemble of thinly sliced cuts of presumably prime beef (kobe?) that barely covers her body.

    Connecticut News recommends that if you are not vegetarian and do happen to eat meat once worn by Lady Gaga, be sure to cook it thoroughly and use a meat thermometer to ensure it reaches an internal temperature of at least 160 degrees F.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 8th, 2010 - 4:49am by Doug Powell

    Supertramp was always big in Canada. Their 1975 album, Crisis-What Crisis set the stage for the megasellers of the next few years. I didn’t really go for Supertramp, but have to admit their music holds up much better than most – Journey is so awful – over the years.

    Julia Stewart of the Produce Marketing Association offers some food safety crisis communication tips in the From Field to Fork blog. It ain’t rocket surgery, but groups screw this up all the time (today I’m looking at you, egg industry; tomorrow, who knows).

    Don’t stonewall

    There can’t be any holes in the food safety net, folks – so large, local, conventional, organic, everyone must get on the food safety bus.

    Don’t settle for status quo

    Your grandfather or great-grandfather’s farming practices are no longer good enough. The modern food safety reality necessitates risk assessment and risk management, GAPs, audits, and the courage to not harvest that suspect block.

    Don’t blame victims

    Consumers (rightfully) expect the food industry to work hard to produce safe foods, so we shouldn’t blame them when they get sick because they didn’t treat our foods like hazardous materials.

    Do consider the return on investment

    A food safety program is an insurance policy. Causing a foodborne illness outbreak can literally cost you the farm. Investing in food safety can help reduce the risk.

    Do have a long-term view

    The food safety landscape is perpetually changing, so strive for continuous improvement.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 8th, 2010 - 4:22am by Doug Powell

    Any system designed to deliver safer food is going run up against some form of hucksterism – food and fraud have always gone together. That doesn’t mean a system is hopelessly flawed, it means make it better to weed out the cheats.

    The New York Daily News reports that just weeks after city officials started forcing eateries to post sanitary letter grades in their windows, the News spotted a suspicious-looking letter A at a restaurant that didn't look grade-A.

    Ming's Chinese take-out on 9th Ave. at 33rd St. had a "Sanitary Inspection Grade" on the wall beside its counter that looked like the ones that have started to crop up in restaurant windows. It had the city seal, the Health Department logo and a helpful reminder to call 311.

    But a check of city records found that - sure enough - Ming's hadn't earned the prized mark.

    To the contrary, though the take-out's last inspection in January came before the city started issuing letter grades, inspectors found serious health code violations. Among them: Evidence of mice, roaches and flying insects.

    Inspectors also discovered that some hot food was stored at too low a temperature to be safe and that some equipment was poorly maintained.

    A manager at Ming's refused to say where he got his fake grade, saying that a company came in and then sent the letter to him. He refused to name that company - or to explain why he posted a grade he hadn't earned. He also refused to give his name.

    City officials say they haven't received any complaints of restaurants posting fake grades, adding they'll crack down on anyone caught cheating. Those restaurants could face a fine of $1,000.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
  • Posted: September 8th, 2010 - 4:03am by Doug Powell

    Another meaningless survey relying on self-reporting has found 50 per cent of 1,053 U.S. respondents said they "wash their hands more thoroughly or longer or more frequently" in public restrooms as a result of the H1N1 virus - that's up from 45 percent in 2009 when the same question was asked.

    But even if people think they are vigilant about washing their hands – observational studies say they aren’t – are people washing and drying hands in a way to lower bacterial loads? Not drying hands thoroughly after washing them could increase the spread of bacteria, and rubbing hands whilst using a conventional electric hand dryer could be a contributing factor. Frequently people give up drying their hands and wipe them on their clothes instead.

    That’s what I observed anecdotally when I first visited Kansas State University in 2005 and saw these groovy all-in-one hand units that are terrible for hand sanitation; paper towels were subsequently installed so people could at least dry their hands properly.

    A study by researchers at the University of Bradford and published in the current Journal of Applied Microbiology evaluated three kinds of hand drying and their effect on transfer of bacteria from the hands to other surfaces: paper towels, traditional hand dryers, which rely on evaporation, and a new model of hand dryer, which rapidly strips water off the hands using high velocity air jets.



    In this study the researchers quantified the effects of hand drying by measuring the number of bacteria on different parts of the hands before and after different drying methods. Volunteers were asked to wash their hands and place them onto contact plates that were then incubated to measure bacterial growth. The volunteers were then asked to dry their hands using either hand towels or one of three hand dryers, with or without rubbing their hands together, and levels of bacteria were re-measured.

    

Dr Snelling and her team found that rubbing the hands together whilst using traditional hand dryers could counteract the reduction in bacterial numbers following handwashing. Furthermore, they found that the relative reduction in the number of bacteria was the same, regardless of the hand dryer used, when hands were kept still. When hands are rubbed together during drying, bacteria that live within the skin can be brought to the surface and transferred to other surfaces, along with surface bacteria that were not removed by handwashing.

    The researchers found the most effective way of keeping bacterial counts low, when drying hands, was using paper towels. Amongst the electric dryers, the model that rapidly stripped the moisture off the hands was best for reducing transfer of bacteria to other surfaces.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Handwashing  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 7th, 2010 - 2:04pm by Doug Powell

    A summary of egg-talk, almost one month into the salmonella-in-half-a-billion-egg recall that has sickened at least 1,500.

    Risk comparisons are risky

    The Iowa egg folks wrote at the beginning of the outbreak in mid-Aug. that “the chance of an egg containing Salmonella Enteritidis is rare in the U.S. Several years ago, it was estimated that 1 in 20,000 eggs might have been contaminated, which meant most consumers probably wouldn't come in contact with such an egg but 1 time in 84 years.”

    Some industry-apologist lawyer wrote, “you and I are ten times more likely to die in an auto accident this year than to culture positive for SE as a result of eating eggs (which averages about 1 in 120,000 annually).”

    These may be statistically accurate, but are of no comfort to those barfing. The American Egg Board estimates the risk of an egg being contaminated with salmonella at about 1 in 20,000. Holding my nose at one end and something else at the other and assuming such an estimate is accurate (and it’s a pooled estimate so is widely variable), if I make mayo or egg nog or dip into the pancake batter, I’ve upped the risk to 5-6 out of 20,000. If a restaurant is making mayo or aioli, dozens if not hundreds or thousands of eggs could be used, cross-contaminating the kitchen area and potentially sickening lots of people daily.

    There’s a different risk exposure dealing with a few eggs at home and the thousands used daily in food service. Risk gets amplified real easy.

    Simple messages aren’t simple

    More than one misguided commenter has said, here are the facts – just cook your eggs.

    Just cook it is an ineffective risk slogan, like, don’t do drugs, employees must wash hands, and, we don’t swim in your toilet so please don’t pee in our pool.

    “If you are concerned, just make sure you cook your eggs to well done. If you have someone that is ill or on immunosuppressive medication, you should do this regardless of the source of eggs. In the meantime, my local stores don’t sell eggs with any of the recalled labels, so I had mine over easy this morning.”

    I don’t have those special salmonella-vision goggles, and worry more about cross-contamination with those ubiquitous egg juices.

    After FDA found piles of crap in Iowa farms linked to the salmonella outbreak, the Iowa Poultry Association said in a statement, the “Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) both state that thoroughly cooked eggs are thoroughly safe eggs. Consumers should know that salmonella is destroyed by the heat of proper cooking. Eggs should be cooked until the whites and yolks are firm. For dishes containing eggs, the internal temperature should reach 160 degrees Fahrenheit.”

    Again, nothing about cross-contamination, which we know happens routinely based on hundreds of hours of video observation from food service kitchens.

    Jennifer Perry, a post-doctoral researcher at Ohio State University had it more correct:

    “Eggs are a raw product. Although it is rare to find Salmonella inside the egg, research conducted by U.S. Department of Agriculture scientists has demonstrated that the pathogen may be present on the exterior of about 8 percent of shell eggs, yet people treat them as if they’re sterile. They wouldn’t handle raw chicken breast the way they handle eggs, but they probably should treat the products about the same.”

    Industry and government suck at communication …

    … and are apparently terrified to go public with information that could prevent others from getting sick. They also don’t seem to care about the trust lost when people find out information was available that could prevent others from barfing.

    State and federal health agencies identified an Iowa egg company as a likely source of illness at least two weeks before the firm launched a massive egg recall Aug. 13, 2010, and the public got its first hint of a growing national salmonella outbreak.

    CDC announced on Aug. 16, 2010, a four-fold increase over the expected number of reported isolates of this particular SE PFGE pattern.

    But it wasn’t until Elizabeth Weise of USA Today put the numbers into context – 228 million eggs recalled, an increase from the normal 50 salmonella cases per week to 200 in June -- on Aug. 18, 2010, that the story began to garner national attention.

    On Aug. 19, CDC said, about 1,400 people were sick: that got attention.

    Yet there has been a vacuum of silence from government and industry surrounding this outbreak, a vacuum that animal welfare and political opportunists are all too ready to fill.

    Chris Clayton of the Progressive Farmer wrote last week that as events have unfolded following a 550-million egg recall, groups created to be agriculture advocates -- agvocates -- have remained relatively quiet about the situation.

    “These groups established by various producer organizations and allied industries to defend agriculture don't want to talk about how ag should respond to the recall and the large business at the center of the federal health probe and possible criminal investigation. … the groups created within agriculture to address perceptions about agriculture are shying away from talking about the DeCoster fiasco.”

    FDA, other federal agencies and industry, do themselves a tremendous disservice by failing to clearly articulate how and when the public (and industry) should be informed about potential health risks. No amount of federal legislation or lawsuits will fix this. Instead it requires a recommitment to having fewer people barf. And any company that wants to lead – especially with profits – will stop hiding behind the cloak of government inspection and will make test results public, market food safety at retail so consumers can choose, and if people get sick from your product, will be the first to tell the public.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 6th, 2010 - 2:05pm by Doug Powell

    On Aug. 17, 2010, the Kansas Department of Agriculture's Division of Food Safety and Lodging inspected Mr. K's Cafe, located at 3901 Vanesta in the Grand Mere district, and cited them for seven critical violations including improper cold holding temperatures, improperly storing chemicals above food preparation areas, and improperly cleaning and sanitizing food contact surfaces.

    Details reveal Mr. K's was cited because mold was found in the ice machine, the meat slicer and tomato slicer weren't cleaned properly and were found with bits of dried food on them, pretty much all the food in the cooler was stored at a temperature of 50 degrees F, and butane fuel was found stored over their food prepping areas.

    On Aug. 19, KDA visited the Chinese Chef restaurant located at 2704 Anderson Avenue. The establishment was cited for ten critical violations including failure to properly wash and sanitize hands, improperly cleaning and sanitizing food contact surfaces, improper cold holding temperatures and improperly disposing of sewage and waste water.

    In the walk-in cooler, raw chicken was being stored over cooked fried chicken tubs; a majority of the rice that was prepared and stored in the same walk-in cooler had an average temperature of 66 degrees.

    On Aug. 27, Mr. Goodcent's Subs and Pastas was inspected and cited for seven critical violations, including improper cold holding temperatures, improperly storing chemicals near food preparation areas, and improperly marking dates on food packages; sliced tomatoes and tuna salad were stored in a cooler at almost 60 degrees.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: September 6th, 2010 - 8:11am by Doug Powell

    Government officials have publicly expressed concern that public health has become a minor issue, consequences are meaningless, and the sale of dodgy food is on the rise.

    How refreshing.

    In what country would bureaucrats make such bold statements to potentially upset the ruling food safety oligarchy of industry, auditors and regulators? U.S.? Canada? U.K.? Australia? Anywhere?

    Kuwait.

    Arba Times reports the Chairman of the Consumer Protection Society Attorney Faisal Al-Sebaie expressed his disappointed over the mediocre measures taken by the relevant authorities to protect public health from greedy traders, who sell spoilt or contaminated food products in the local market.

    Al-Sebaie lamented the public health has become a minor issue for the concerned authorities, especially the ministries of Social Affairs, Labor and Commerce, leading to the spread of contaminated or expired food products in the local market.

    He said no strict measure has so far been taken to prevent the distribution of contaminated or expired food items because the government has opted to remain silent over the unscrupulous activities of greedy traders.

    He wondered why a country as rich as Kuwait cannot establish a modern laboratory to conduct tests on the imported food items.

    Meanwhile, Secretary-General of the society Attorney Khalid Al-Dosri appealed to the government to immediately take strict measures against those proven to have violated the food safety regulations. He thinks the Ministry of Commerce is keen only on arresting the owners of small shops, which sell spoilt food products, while disregarding the violations committed by business tycoons.

    Moreover, Chairman of the Social Committee at the society Khalid Al-Sebaei wondered why the Ministry of Social Affairs and Labor dissolved the boards of directors of 13 cooperative societies allegedly for engaging in corruption and manipulating prices without putting them in jail. He urged the ministry to obligate the cooperative societies to submit financial and administrative reports quarterly to prevent, if not eliminate, the violations.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 6th, 2010 - 7:40am by Doug Powell

    The Denver Post reports this morning, at first, Mary Pierce (right, photo by Helen H. Richardson, The Denver Post) thought her 2-year-old couldn't stop throwing up because she had a typical stomach bug. A few days later, she watched in terror as the lethargic little girl was rushed by helicopter to The Children's Hospital, her little kidneys shutting down.

    Then Nicole's 5-year-old brother, Aaron, fell ill, following her into the hospital and onto a dialysis machine. The cause of their potentially deadly illness: drinking raw goat's milk from a local dairy.

    "I'm not a typical Boulder person," Pierce said. "We were just trying it because my son is allergic to dairy. We're not going near it anymore. … It's not worth it. You can't understand until it's your kid lying in the bed."

    The outbreak in June that sent the Pierce children to the hospital for three weeks and sickened about 30 others has state health officials ramping up efforts to warn people against drinking unpasteurized milk.

    There are lots of foods that make people sick, and people are free to pick their poisons. But if raw milk is about choice, then pasteurized milk is safer and more affordable. And it’s always the kids that suffer from their parents’ choices.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Raw Food  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 5th, 2010 - 2:35pm by Doug Powell

    Philip Brasher of the Des Moines Register reports that the salmonella-in-Wright and Hillandale-eggs outbreak that has sickened at least 1,470 in the U.S. left officials at Costco Wholesale Corp. scratching their heads. How had inspectors for Costco, who looked over the northeast Iowa farm where the chain bought eggs, not noticed the rodent holes in the henhouses?

    Craig Wilson, who oversees food safety for Costco, said, "There are a lot of guys going, 'Hey, wait a minute. They're finding stuff and our guys were there and they didn't see it.' "

    Critics – and I was one of them -- say many food-safety audits are designed to tell companies paying for them what they want to hear. The defunct Peanut Corp. of America had a glowing food safety audit from an outside firm before a 2008 salmonella outbreak in peanut butter that killed nine people and sickened more than 700.

    U.S. Department of Agriculture inspectors also missed the problems at Hillandale as well as at Wright County Egg, a producer that recalled 380 million eggs and supplied Hillandale with hens and feed.

    The USDA employees, whose main job is to grade eggs on their condition and catch defects, don't check henhouses or look into farms' salmonella-prevention programs, a job the USDA leaves to the Food and Drug Administration.

    The USDA employees do inspect conditions in packing facilities for companies that request and pay for the service. The packing facilities at Hillandale in West Union and at four more farms operated by Wright County Egg had all been audited by the USDA in 2009 or this year and received stellar marks - grades of 97 to 99 percent.

    Several customers of R.W. Sauder Inc., an egg producer in Pennsylvania, have told the company they plan to add salmonella-prevention measures to their egg specifications, said Paul Sauder, the firm's president. Those buyers include a large supermarket chain and food service company, whom Sauder declined to name.

    Buyers "had the perception that as long as the eggs were USDA-inspected, all eggs were equal. There is renewed awareness now," he said.

    Salmonella in eggs is not new.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 5th, 2010 - 1:23pm by Doug Powell

    There’s something decadent about watching a Kansas State football game 50 yards from the sandy beaches of Anna Maria Island, Florida, on a Saturday afternoon while dining on grilled grouper fresh from the Gulf of Mexico, asparagus, summer squash and sweet potatoes.

    Then Coffman started barfing.

    Carson Coffman (right, during Saturday’s game, pretty much as shown), K-State’s starting quarterback (for now) was seen hurling on the sidelines and had to leave the game in the third quarter to get rehydrated with an IV-drip. According to media reports KSU’s QB barfed about 10 times during the game.

    It wasn’t my cooking. No word on whose cooking it was, or whether the yakking was food-related at all. And who cares. K-State beat UCLA 31-22. And we just finished a delightful lunch of grilled Gulf shrimp accompanied by grilled peaches, pineapple and strawberries.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 5th, 2010 - 11:16am by Doug Powell

    Seven children in County Armagh, who all attend Holly House nursery in Lurgan, have been infected with E. coli O157, the Public Health Agency has confirmed.

    A mother whose child is at the nursery said,

    "It is very worrying because of the seriousness of E. coli. But as far as I know none of the children seems to be very ill. I could not fault the nursery. They are managing very well and have provided lots of information and support."

    "Locally, it is a surprise that an outbreak of E. coli has taken place," said SDLP councillor for the area, Mary McAlinden.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 3rd, 2010 - 3:41pm by Doug Powell

    As I told my daughter before she went on a high school graduation party in the Dominican Republic, get vaccinated for hepatitis A.

    Alberta Health Services issued a release earlier today reporting an employee from the Scenic Drive McDonald’s downtown in Lethbridge, Alberta (that’s in Canada) has been diagnosed with hepatitis A.

    Anyone who ate there 20–22 August 2010 may have been exposed and should see his/her physician.

    Alberta Health Services will be offering vaccine through clinics at the West Pavilion of Exhibition Park today from 1:30–19:00, tomorrow from 9:00–15:00, and Sunday from 9:00–15:00. The vaccine is effective if administered within 14 days of exposure only.

    Alberta Health Services believes the employee contracted the disease while travelling abroad.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Hepatitis A  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 3rd, 2010 - 3:12pm by Doug Powell

    Elizabeth Weise of USA Today writes in a story just posted on-line that there is nothing small scale about Pearl Valley Eggs, deep in the heart of Illinois farm country. The egg farm itself, two miles south of the nearest town, is a neat collection of 350-foot- and 450-foot henhouses covered in white steel siding. They're linked by overhead pipes that bring in ground corn and soybeans from the farm's own feed mill and conveyor belts that take out chicken poop.

    The farm employs 100 people and produces 800,000 to 850,000 eggs a day, seven days a week.

    Yet, in the face of the nation's largest recorded egg recall, a total of 550 million eggs potentially infected with salmonella enteritidis, and revelations of filthy conditions at the two Iowa egg farms involved, many animal rights groups and organic supporters have pointed a finger of blame at industrial animal agriculture.

    Ben Thompson, 30, who runs Pearl Valley Eggs with his father, Dave, who founded the business in 1987 and now houses 1.1 million Shaver chickens in seven henhouses, says since the Thompsons began testing a decade ago, the farm has never once had a positive test for salmonella enteritidis.

    The story says there is a definite link between large flock size and salmonella. On average, large-scale U.S. layer operations with more than 100,000 hens per house are four times more likely to test positive for salmonella enteritidis than smaller houses with fewer than 100,000 hens, according to a paper set for publication in January in the journal Poultry Science. The report suggests that one reason might be that salmonella is transmitted in contaminated feces and dust, and higher densities of birds mean more of both.

    At the same time, scientists caution that there haven't been good studies to show the rate of salmonella infection in equally large flocks that are cage free.

    Jeffrey Armstrong, dean of the School of Agriculture and Natural Resources at Michigan State University in East Lansing, says, "It is about management — each type (of production method) has its advantages and disadvantages."

    At Pearl Valley, Dave Thompson says happy hens, safe eggs and making a profit are possible, but it takes a lot of attention to detail and spending 12 hours a day, seven days a week in the barns. "I take good care of my birds and my wife, and I put every penny back into the farm."

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 3rd, 2010 - 8:50am by Doug Powell

    Salmonella is everywhere. And while the salmonella-in-eggs-from-Iowa outbreak is capturing media attention, other outbreaks continue.

    The LaCrosse Tribune reports that salmonella poisoning did sicken about 30 people in Vernon County, Wisconsin late last week, but the illness is not thought to be connected to the recent nationwide egg recall.

    The Wisconsin Lab of Hygiene confirmed Tuesday that patients who came into Vernon Memorial Healthcare had salmonella poisoning, Vernon County Health Department Director Beth Johnson said.

    All of the cases were related to people who attended the same private party, Johnson said, and no local businesses or restaurants were involved.

    While eggs are suspected in the outbreak, "it has nothing to do with the current egg recall," she said.

    Meanwhile, a popular Mexican restaurant near Bakersfield, Calif., was forced to shut their doors Thursday, after four people were sickened with salmonella poisoning. Two of them remain hospitalized.

    The Kern County health department says Don Perico may be the common denominator in these illnesses.

    The sign posted on the restaurant's front doors says the restaurant is remodeling, but the health department says they're the ones who closed the doors. "There had been some past examples of significant violations," said Matt Constantine with the Health Department. "We have worked through them, we have allowed them to stay open. But in this case because of the potential health risk we took immediate action."
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 3rd, 2010 - 8:27am by Doug Powell

    see.no_.evil_.monkeys.jpg

    Alison Young of USA Today reports today U.S. Department of Agriculture staff regularly on site at two Iowa egg processors implicated in a national salmonella outbreak were supposed to enforce rules against the presence of disease-spreading rodents and other vermin, federal regulations show.

    Doug Powell, an associate professor of food safety at Kansas State University, said regulations are only as good as their enforcement, adding, "It goes back to the responsibility of whoever is producing the food. How do you establish a corporate culture where people pay attention to food safety?"

    The USDA egg graders, part of an industry-paid program, were at Wright County Egg and Hillandale Farms at least 40 hours a week — including before the outbreak — inspecting the size and quality of eggs inside processing buildings.

    Though USDA regulations say buildings and "outside premises" must be free of conditions that harbor vermin, the agency takes a narrow view of its responsibilities. Under the USDA's unwritten interpretation of the regulations, egg graders only look for vermin inside the specific processing building where they are based, said Dean Kastner, an assistant USDA branch chief in poultry grading program.

    The agency interprets outside premises as only the area immediately around the processing building's loading dock and trash receptacle, he said.

    Salmonella can be spread by rodents and wild birds. Outbreak investigators from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) this week released reports documenting filthy conditions in and around egg laying barns at the two companies, including rodents, rodent holes, wild birds, flies and other vermin.

    Hillandale Farms spokeswoman Julie DeYoung said the barns at its facility are about 50 feet from the processing building. At Wright County Egg, the laying barns are 50 feet apart and connected to the processing plant, said spokeswoman Hinda Mitchell.

    Associated Press subsequently reported two former workers at Wright County Egg facilities, Robert and Deanna Arnold, say they reported problems such as leaking manure and dead chickens to USDA employees but were ignored and told to return to work.

    The salmonella outbreak has led to a recall of about 550 million eggs.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 3rd, 2010 - 8:05am by Doug Powell

    William Neuman of the New York Times writes this morning that for the first time in the U.S., public health officials have linked ground beef to illnesses from a rare strain of E. coli, adding fuel to an already fierce debate over expanding federal rules meant to keep the toxic bacteria out of the meat supply.

    Cargill Meat Solutions recalled 8,500 pounds of hamburger on Saturday after investigators determined that it was the likely source of a bacterial strain known as E. coli O26, which had sickened three people in Maine and New York.

    Under federal rules, it is illegal to sell ground beef containing a more common strain of the bacteria, E. coli O157:H7, which has been responsible for thousands of illnesses, many deaths and the recall of millions of pounds of beef over the years. But federal regulators are now considering whether to give the same illegal status to at least six other E. coli strains, including O26, which can also make people violently sick.

    The meat industry has opposed such a change, saying it is not needed. Among the arguments the industry has used was one stubborn fact: no outbreak in this country from the rarer strains of E. coli had ever been definitively tied to ground beef.

    James Marsden, a professor of food safety and security at Kansas State University, said about the outbreak and recall,

    “It might act as a catalyst. Clearly it’s back on the front burner, that’s for sure, and clearly USDA is under pressure.”

    The federal Agriculture Department has been trying for several years to decide what to do about the additional strains of E. coli. The issue now falls in the lap of the Obama administration’s new head of food safety at the department, Dr. Elisabeth Hagen, who was appointed last month.

    Dr. Hagen has yet to say publicly what she plans to do. But in a written statement provided to The New York Times, she said, “In order to best prevent illnesses and deaths from dangerous E. coli in beef, our policies need to evolve to address a broader range of these pathogens, beyond E.coli O157:H7. … Our approach should ensure that public health and food safety policy keeps pace with the demonstrated advances in science and data about foodborne illness to best protect consumers.”

    The agency has said that it is reluctant to make additional forms of toxic E. coli illegal in ground beef until it has developed a rapid test that can detect those strains in packing plants. Such tests are not expected to be ready until at least late next year.

    The beef industry argued against declaring the additional E. coli strains illegal in an Aug. 18 letter that the American Meat Institute, a trade group, sent to the agriculture secretary, Tom Vilsack.

    Giving the strains illegal status could “cause more harm than good,” the letter said, by forcing costly testing when resources would be better spent on measures to prevent bacteria from getting into the meat in the first place.

    It said that measures the industry had taken to combat the most common strain of E. coli were also effective against the other strains, and it urged the agency to conduct further studies before making a decision.

    James H. Hodges, the meat institute’s executive vice president, said that a single outbreak did not alter the industry’s position.

    “We have never said it wasn’t a potential public health problem. The debate is what’s the appropriate regulatory program.”

    And once again, J. Patrick Boyle, president of the American Meat Institute, going mano-a-mano with Stephen Colbert on issues like non-O157 STECs.

     

    The Colbert Report Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
    Better Know a Lobby - American Meat Institute
    www.colbertnation.com
    Colbert Report Full Episodes 2010 Election Fox News
    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 3rd, 2010 - 7:31am by Doug Powell

    Translated by Albert Amgar

    Si il n’y plus de courant, que puis-je conserver ?

    Les aliments qui peuvent être conservé de façon sécuritaire au-dessus de 5°C pendant quelques jours sont :

    Les fruits et les végétaux frais non coupés,

    Le ketchup, les condiments, les olives, les confitures et les gelées, la moutarde, la sauce barbecue, la sauce soja, le pain, les petits pains, les bagels, les gâteaux (sans crème, ni fourrage), les biscuits et les muffins et certains fromages à pâte dure.

    Conserver les portes fermées de votre réfrigérateur et de votre congélateur aussi longtemps que possible pour maintenir une température froide. Vous pouvez recongeler de façon sécuritaire des aliments qui contiennent encore des cristaux de glace ou qui ont été conservés à 5°C ou en dessous.

    Avec la porte fermée, les aliments dans la plupart des congélateurs vont rester en dessous de 5°C pendant au moins 3 jours, même en été.
    La vitesse de décongélation dépend de :
    • la quantité d’aliments présente dans le congélateur
    • la nature des aliments
    • la température de l’aliment
    • la taille et l’isolation du congélateur
    Remplir l'espace vide de votre congélateur avec de la glace pour aider à les aliments congelés à rester plus longtemps lorsque le courant est coupé.
    Soyez préparé lorsque le courant est coupé
    • Placer un thermomètre dans votre réfrigérateur et votre congélateur
    • ayez un thermomètre digital sensible à lecteur rapide pour vérifier les aliments
    • Ayez des aliments qui ne nécessite pas une réfrigération et qui peuvent être mangé froid ou chauffé avec un grill d’extérieur
    • Congeler des poches d’eau pour en faire de la glace et aider ainsi à conserver froid les aliments dans les réfrigérateurs et les congélateurs
    • Prévoyez à l'avance en préparant des glacières et en sachant où se trouvent de la glace sèche et des fournisseurs de blocs de glace
    Les ouragans et les orages peuvent entraîner une coupure de courant et conduire à des problèmes de sécurité des aliments
    Protégez vos aliments en étant prepare
     

    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 3rd, 2010 - 7:25am by Doug Powell

    Traverse City, Michigan, is not in the upper peninsula, or UP.

    I’m sorry.

    But something’s going on in Michigan, where last week several people were confirmed sick with shigatoxin-producing E. coli, and late Wednesday, Huron County health types announced several children and one adult are experiencing gastrointestinal (bowel) infections which are presumed to be E. coli O157:H7.

    The Huron County Health Department issued a release Wednesday afternoon. with the usual snappy soundbites like,

    “Some people may experience only mild diarrhea or no symptoms at all,” and, “Eating meat that is rare or inadequately cooked is the most common way of getting the infection.”

    Maybe, but I doubt it. Cross contamination could be a bigger cause, based on direct observation of people in commercial or home kitchens.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 2nd, 2010 - 6:49am by Doug Powell

    Benjamin Chapman
    Traducido por Gonzalo Erdozain
    Resumen del folleto informativo mas reciente:
    - Huracanes 
y tormentas 
pueden causar cortes 
de luz y problemas con los alimentos
    - Esté preparado y proteja sus alimentos
    - Ponga un termómetro en su heladera y freezer
    - Prepare conservadoras y esté al tanto de lugares donde pueda comprar hielo seco y hielo en bloque
    Los folletos informativos son creados semanalmente y puestos en restaurantes, tiendas y granjas, y son usados para entrenar y educar a través del mundo. Si usted quiere proponer un tema o mandar fotos para los folletos, contacte a Ben Chapman a benjamin_chapman@ncsu.edu.
    Puede seguir las historias de los folletos informativos y barfblog en twitter
    @benjaminchapman y @barfblog.
     

    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: September 2nd, 2010 - 6:01am by Doug Powell

    The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) warned the public last night not to consume the raw beef products described below because these products may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.

    All cuts of raw beef, including but not limited to tenderloin, beef chunks and ground beef, sold on August 6, 2010 from Kabul Farms retail store located on the appropriately named Beverley Hills Drive in North York, Ontario, are affected by this alert. These beef products were wrapped at the store for sale on demand and may not bear a label indicating packing date, lot code, or a Best Before date. So that’s helpful. Consumers are advised to check their home refrigerator or freezer if they have the affected beef products.

    CFIA is aware of an E. coli O157:H7 illness outbreak in Ontario and is collaborating with a bunch of agencies but won’t provide any information on how many got sick when and where, although does state the investigation is ongoing.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    E. coli  |  Comments