August 2010

  • Posted: August 31st, 2010 - 2:28pm by Doug Powell

    I can get dolphin-free tuna and animal-friendly beef and table eggs raised under all kinds of conditions, but how can I avoid eggs from salmonella offenders? There’s so much reselling and rebranding at retail that the brand name is often meaningless.

    Iowa Senator Chuck “Chuck” Grassley told Philip Brasher of the Des Moines Register today that the government probably can’t shut down egg-beater Jack DeCoster short of finding criminal activity, but, “the marketplace is making the determination if the law doesn’t. Probably in this case the company may be hurt in the marketplace to the extent to which people are going to look and not buy eggs that have the word W-R-I-G-H-T on it,” referring to the name of Jack DeCoster’s Galt-based company, Wright County Egg.

    Brasher notes though that DeCoster eggs have been packaged under a variety of names, including supermarket brands and the names of competing egg producers such as Sparboe Farms, who used Wright County Egg to augment their supplies.

    Grassley also called on the Senate Democratic leadership to pass a food-safety bill that would increase the Food and Drug Administration’s oversight of other segments of the food industry, including fruit and vegetable production.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 31st, 2010 - 6:10am by Doug Powell

    chicken.south_.park_.jpg

    In January 2009, Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) was linked to a growing outbreak of illness across the U.S. caused by Salmonella serotype Typhimurium. Eventually, all peanuts and peanut products processed at PCA’s Blakely, Georgia, plant since January 1, 2007 were recalled, including over 3,900 peanut butter and other peanut-containing products from more than 350 companies. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 691 people were sickened and nine died across 46 U.S. states and in Canada from the outbreak.

    By Feb. 15, 2009, The Washington Post described the business culture at PCA from the viewpoint of a former buyer for a major snack manufacturer -- a filthy plant with a leaky roof and windows that were left open, allowing birds to enter. The company purchased only low quality, inexpensive peanuts and paid food handlers the minimum wage lawfully allowed. The lack of a food safety culture was most evident in the description of how PCA dealt with finished product that tested positive for Salmonella spp. A report by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration identified many instances in which the product was retested until a negative result was achieved; in other instances PCA shipped the product to their customer despite the positive test or before the test result was received.

    FDA further noted there were inadequate controls at the PCA plant to prevent contamination and insufficient cleaning and sanitation. Facilities for handwashing were also used to clean utensils and mops, increasing the potential for recontamination of washed hands. Equipment settings -- for example, roasting temperature and belt speed -- had not been evaluated to ensure that the roasting step was sufficient to kill bacteria. Raw and roasted peanuts were stored directly next to one another, allowing for potential contamination of the roasted finished product. Gaps in the physical integrity of the building were observed around the loading bays and the air conditioning intakes in the roof that provided pests with open access to the plant. Despite these deficiencies, PCA maintained the highest possible rating from auditing firm AIB International.

    Earlier this year, Basic Food Flavors Inc., the Las Vegas company at the center of a recall of more than 100 food products containing hydrolyzed vegetable protein, or HVP, continued to make and distribute food ingredients for about a month after it learned salmonella was present at its processing facility, according to a Food and Drug Administration report.

    Yesterday, similarly eerie details started to emerge from investigators going through the salmonella-in-eggs mess that has sickened almost 1,500 over the summer and led to the recall of about 550 million eggs. Highlights of the reports (called 483s) and public comments by FDA-types include:

    • David Elder, director of the FDA's Office of Regulatory Affairs, told a press conference Monday the 483 forms show "significant objectionable conditions;"

    • at Wright County Egg facilities, live mice were found inside laying houses at four sites, and numerous live and dead flies were observed in egg-laying houses at three locations;

    • chicken manure accumulated 4 to 8 feet high underneath the cages at two locations, pushing out access doors, allowing open access for wildlife and other farm animals;

    • at one location, uncaged birds were using tall manure piles to access egg-laying areas;

    • inspectors saw employees not changing or not wearing protective clothing when moving from laying house to laying house;

    • three Hillandale Farms locations contained unsealed rodent holes with evidence of live rodents at one of the facilities, with gaps in walls and doors at other sites.; and,

    • uncaged chickens were observed tracking manure into the caged hen areas.

    Dr Michael Taylor, the FDA's deputy commissioner for foods, told reporters that though the FDA has no reason to believe the practices that investigators turned up are common at all egg-producing facilities, inspectors will be inspecting about 600 large egg producers, those that have 50,000 or more laying hens, over the next several months starting in September with what it believes may be the highest-risk facilities.

    Kenneth E. Anderson, a professor of poultry science at North Carolina State University said,

    “That is not good management, bottom line. I am surprised that an operation was being operated in that manner in this day and age.”

    How did this happen? A gap in federal or state inspection requirements may be partly to blame – but only partly.

    What firms and retailers were buying these eggs? Don’t they require internal or third-party food safety audits of their suppliers? Who were the auditors and where are their reports? Has any buyer looked at owner Jack DeCoster over the years and said, your farm's a dump, I’m not buying your eggs?

    While waiting for government and Godot, it’s the thousands of American egg farmers who are going to suffer if sales decline, so why not unleash the power of food safety marketing and let consumers choose at retail.

    Repeated outbreaks have shown that all food is not safe: there are good producers and bad producers, good retailers and bad retailers. As a consumer, I have no way of knowing. Telling me an egg is local and grown with love is food marketing but has nothing to do with food safety and salmonella.

    Tell consumers about salmonella-testing programs meant to reduce risks; put a URL on egg cartons so those who are interested can use the Internet or even personal phones to see how the eggs were raised. Boring press releases in the absence of data only magnify consumer mistrust.

    Food producers should truthfully market their microbial food safety programs, coupled with behavioral-based food safety systems that foster a positive food safety culture from farm-to-fork. The best producers and processors will go far beyond the lowest common denominator of government and should be rewarded in the marketplace.
     

     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 30th, 2010 - 6:11am by Doug Powell

    He said, she said in today’s USA Today, with the editorial board saying the salmonella outbreak that has sickened thousands means “someone obviously fouled up,” and Indiana egg farmer and United Egg Producers chairman, Bob Krouse, saying “completely cooked eggs are completely safe eggs.”

    Krouse: “Family farms like ours produce 80 billion eggs every year in this country, and we go to great lengths to help ensure the quality and safety of every one of them.”

    USA Today: “The egg recall is part of a pattern. When problems emerge with America's food supply or in other areas where safety is crucial, it often starts with a rogue company or CEO who sees safety violations as a cost of doing business and outmaneuvers federal regulators while Congress dithers.”

    Krouse: “Our efforts must be having an effect because the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety Inspection Service estimates the risk of illness to be less than ‘1 in 1 million’ egg servings for the average consumer.”

    USA Today: “There’s no excuse for contamination so widespread that it sickens nearly 1,500 people and requires the recall of more than half a billion eggs.”

    Krouse: “Egg farmers invest millions of dollars each year in biosecurity and food safety efforts. The vast majority of us already incorporate vaccination programs into our food safety plans.”

    USA Today: “Regulations requiring egg farm operators to test for salmonella stayed on the shelf through the notoriously anti-regulatory Bush administration until the Obama administration finally got them into place last month. The FDA says those rules could have prevented the outbreak, which presumes that farms would have complied — and that the FDA would have dogged them.”

    Krouse: “It is disappointing to see some groups try to take advantage of this crisis for their own political or social agendas. We urge everyone to wait until the FDA finishes its investigation of the two companies involved before jumping to any conclusions. “

    USA Today: “… instead of just writing up violations, it (FDA) needs to crack down on rogue companies, treating them the same way the criminal justice system treats repeat offenders.”
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 29th, 2010 - 9:11am by Doug Powell

    Elizabeth Weise writes in tomorrow’s USA Today today that in the wake of one of the largest egg recalls on record with more than 1,400 illnesses linked to eggs produced on two Iowa farms, the egg industry is resorting to the worst tactic of all – blaming the victim.

    Krista Eberle of the United Egg Producers' Egg Safety Center said,

    "Some people may not think of an egg as you would ground beef, but they need to start. It may sound harsh and I don't mean it to sound that way. But all the responsibility cannot be placed on the farmer. Somewhere along the line consumers have to be responsible for what they put in their bodies."

    So what about all those food magazines and porn shows with images of lovingly undercooked eggs?

    I told Weise there has been some kind of massive failure for that many people to get sick with salmonella, and that if indeed eggs now need to be treated "like hazardous waste," then the issue isn't so much the egg on the plate as the egg in the bowl, and on the counter and stove.

    Douglas Powell, a professor of food safety at Kansas State University in Manhattan, Kansas, said,

    "You know, when you're making scrambled eggs and egg ends up on the counter?" His team at K-State has spent hundreds of hours videotaping actual home cooks working in actual kitchens. Eggs could end up anywhere, on hands, dish towels, utensils, the stove, everywhere. People are basically "delusional at how good they are at handling food.”

    Nancy Donley, board president of Safe Tables Our Priority, a food safety consumer group, said,

    "Telling me that basically 'You didn't cook it right,' it's just offensive. The problem isn't how consumers are preparing the food, the problem is that the food is contaminated. They keep trying to push the responsibility onto consumers, they're just not taking their own responsibility."

    If consumers are really being held accountable as the last line of defense in the food safety farm-to-fork line, then the egg industry needs to be explicit about it, says Carol Tucker-Foreman, an assistant secretary of agriculture under President Carter who's worked on food policy at Consumer Federation of America for decades.

    "Should egg cartons be required to carry a message that says 'Warning — to protect your health and the health of those in your household, you should assume that these eggs are contaminated with Salmonella Enteriditis and must be handled carefully in order to avoid possible illness?' " she asks.

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 28th, 2010 - 4:57am by Doug Powell

    A Pacific National Exhibition employee – that’s like the state fair they have in Vancouver, which is in Canada -- was hospitalized Thursday night after buying and drinking a bottle of water at the fair tainted with what is thought to be ammonium chloride.

    The Vancouver Sun reports that just after 11 p.m. Thursday, the PNE employee experienced dizziness and muscle weakness and was taken to hospital 30 minutes after drinking a bottle of water from Hunky Bill’s concession inside the fair, Vancouver Police spokeswoman Jana McGuinness said in a press release.

    Upon later inspection, it was apparent that the bottle of Dasani water contained small holes where a syringe had apparently been inserted and the substance injected in what PNE spokeswoman Laura Ballance called a single isolated incident.

    The Vancouver Police Department is investigating the incident and, according to Vancouver Coastal Health spokeswoman Anna Marie D’Angelo, there have been no other reports of similar illnesses to Vancouver Coastal Health at this time.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 28th, 2010 - 4:35am by Doug Powell

    Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., a Wyalusing, Pa. establishment, is recalling approximately 8,500 pounds of ground beef products that may be contaminated with E. coli O26, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.

    The product subject to recall includes:

    • 42-pound cases of "GROUND BEEF FINE 90/10," containing three (3) - approximately 14 pound chubs each. These products have a "use/freeze by" date of "07/01/10," and an identifying product code of "W69032."

    The products subject to recall bears the establishment number "EST. 9400" inside the USDA mark of inspection. These products were produced on June 11, 2010, and were shipped to distribution centers in Connecticut and Maryland for further distribution. It is important to note that the above listed products were repackaged into consumer-size packages and sold under different retail brand names. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on FSIS' website at

    FSIS and the establishment are concerned that consumers may also freeze the product before use and that some product may still be in consumers' freezers. FSIS strongly encourages consumers to check their freezers and immediately discard any product subject to this recall.

    FSIS became aware of the problem on August 5, 2010 when the agency was notified by the Maine Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Resources of an E. coli O26 cluster of illnesses. In conjunction with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Maine Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Resources, the New York State Department of Health, and New York State Department of Agriculture & Markets, two (2) case-patients have been identified in Maine, as well as one (1) case-patient in New York with a rare, indistinguishable PFGE pattern as determined by PFGE subtyping in PulseNet. PulseNet is a national network of public health and food regulatory agency laboratories coordinated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Illness onset dates range from June 24, 2010, through July 16, 2010.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 27th, 2010 - 9:52am by Doug Powell

    KENS 5 news reports that a new investigator is looking into the sewage spill that forced a Leon Springs restaurant to close.

    The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has taken over the investigation into how sewage found its way into the water well that supplies Fralo's Art of Pizza.

    At first, SAWS officials said no one was affected by the Aug. 19 overflow, but then 24 restaurant customers were sickened from E. coli.

    Health department inspectors allowed Fralo's to re-open this past weekend after water tests came back negative.

    It's still a mystery how the sewage got into the well.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 27th, 2010 - 3:40am by Doug Powell

    Advertising Age reports the American Egg Board has taken out full-page ads in major newspapers including The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and USA Today to try and tamper down rising fears around America's favorite breakfast food.

    The ads call attention to the fact that "the potentially affected eggs, which make up less than 1% of all U.S. eggs, have been removed from store shelves" and end with the reminder that "thoroughly cooked means thoroughly safe." Consumers are driven from the print ads to a website, eggsafety.org.

    What the ads do not talk about is risks of cross-contamination, as anyone who has cracked an egg into a bowl knows about.

    Kevin Burkum, senior VP-marketing for the American Egg Board, told Ad Age the messages are "aimed at educating consumers on the safety of eggs and how to properly cook them." He added that the organization is also looking at expanding the print campaign to radio and digital efforts to get the message out.

    As soon as any group talks about educating consumers, they’ve given up.

    Instead, the egg folks should treat consumers like they may have a few functioning neurons, talk about salmonella testing data and sell safety directly to consumers at retail.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: August 27th, 2010 - 3:27am by Doug Powell

    The News-Review reports that salmonella that contaminated packages at Umpqua Dairy's milk processing plant in Roseburg was found in equipment that washes and sanitizes crates receiving packaged milk and juice, Doug Feldkamp said Wednesday.

    Feldkamp said he didn't know how the salmonella got into the system, which state health and agriculture officials say has been cleaned and now meets safety standards.

    The Oregon Public Health Division attribute 23 cases of salmonellosis in nine counties to the bacteria at the dairy. Two people were hospitalized. The cases date back to October of last year. Health officials say that they only last week traced the illnesses to the dairy.

    The dairy shut down the Roseburg plant last week and voluntarily recalled products packaged there.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 27th, 2010 - 3:01am by Doug Powell

    President Barack Obama got a sandwich at Jerry's Famous Deli in Miami last week, which was slapped with 26 restaurant violations for all types of uncleanliness by a state inspector on Monday.

    The restaurant inspection comes less than a week after Obama made his to-go order of two corned beef sandwiches on rye.

    An inspector stopped the sale of cooked meatballs after he found raw meat sitting out in the open in unsafe temperatures. Employees were also seen handling meat and bread without gloves and without washing their hands properly.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: August 26th, 2010 - 4:15pm by Doug Powell

    The New York Times reports that since July 28, when the department rolled out its new letter-grade rating system, 48 percent of the 250 restaurants that have had an initial inspection and, when needed, a re-inspection, have earned an A grade.

    Another 31 percent earned B grades. The C rating was given to 12 percent of restaurants, and 8 percent were closed until they could correct health hazards that would endanger the public.

    Since the end of July, 1,825 food establishments in the five boroughs have received an initial inspection, the department said, but many have not completed the two-stage process.

    Any restaurant not receiving an A gets a mandatory follow-up inspection within two to three weeks. If the grade still falls short of an A, the restaurant can challenge the grade at an administrative tribunal, but must prominently post a “grade pending” sign until the challenge is resolved.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: August 26th, 2010 - 12:18pm by Doug Powell

    Associated Press reports a California man who says he ordered French onion soup and bit into a condom instead of melted cheese has settled his lawsuit against the Claim Jumper restaurant chain.

    The terms of today's settlement were not disclosed.

    Both sides say in a statement the deal indicates no admission of liability by either party.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 26th, 2010 - 10:29am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Headline writers across the U.S. have been increasing their egg-related pun usage as coverage continues. According to headlines, many seem to be scrambling (yes, most had the same joke).

    Here are some of the select words over the past 24 hours.

    Foodservice reactions (from AP):
    "If someone asks for eggs over-easy, what do you do, put a skull and crossbones on their table?" said Louis Tricoli, who owns three Wisconsin restaurants with his family, including one where nearly two dozen people were sickened in late June after likely eating the now-recalled eggs. "Undercooked beef, undercooked pork, chicken, eggs, anything you ask to be undercooked, it's at your own risk."

    At Atlanta's West Egg Cafe, business was brisk last weekend when customers chowed through nearly 2,900 eggs over the course of three days. Still, some diners made sure to ask whether the eggs were safe, said Chef Patric Bell. The restaurant's eggs weren't affected by the recall and he said so far no one was changing their breakfast orders. "If I couldn't get eggs that were safe, I wouldn't serve them at all," he said.

    Safe is like a guarantee of risk-free, and raw/undercooked eggs are not -- data shows that Salmonella Enteriditis is in or on 1 in 20,000 eggs in the U.S.. There is always a risk.

    The harmful bacteria typically contaminate one out of every 10,000 to 20,000 eggs. That risk is always there for people who like eggs that aren't cooked until the yolks are solid, said Benjamin Chapman, an assistant professor specializing in food safety at North Carolina State University. "It's difficult to say if the risk is any different than it was two weeks ago or two years ago."

    Food safety decisions are based on risk/benefit trade offs; and safety means a lot of things to folks (from AP):

    The recall isn't enough to scare off Charles Mettler, who ordered an eggs Benedict on Tuesday when he stopped by Drake Diner's in Des Moines, Iowa. "I'm probably more worried about the Hollandaise sauce as far as cholesterol." Mettler said.

    Risks aren't just from undercooking or temperature abuse-- cross-contamination is also a potential route to contaminate non-egg containing dishes (from the syndicated HealthDay):

    During food preparation, take precautions by thoroughly washing your hands, countertops and utensils after handling raw eggs. "When you crack an egg, a little egg juice will usually get on your hands or countertop. You want to make sure you've washed that before you accidentally lay your toast on it," Chapman said.

    An example of a restaurant operator evaluating risk/benefit of using eggs that were included in the recall, even with control measures such as cooking (from AP):

    When Peggy Bevan, owner of the Egg Shell of Cherry Creek breakfast cafe in Denver , learned that the egg recall had expanded to Colorado, it was time to clear the decks. "We dumped everything we had prepped, from pancakes to French toast batters," she said. "We didn't take a chance."

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 26th, 2010 - 6:51am by Doug Powell

    When John Lennon heard in 1967 that one of his former schools was making students deconstruct the lyrics to songs by the Beatles, he responded by writing the most nonsensical song he could come up with, combining the lyrics of 3 previously unfinished songs – two written on acid trips – and stated at the time about the result, I Am the Walrus, “Let the fu**ers work that one out.”

    The Eggman in the song apparently referred to The Animals lead singer, Eric Burdon, who had a fondness for breaking eggs over the bodies of naked women.

    This trivia is as useful as most of the information surrounding the salmonella-in-eggs outbreak that has sickened a thousand Americans.

    There are hints of information but most public commenters are using the outbreak for political or legal opportunism.

    Today’s USA Today reports that state and federal health agencies identified an Iowa egg company as a likely source of illness at least two weeks before the firm launched a massive egg recall Aug. 13 and the public got its first hint of a growing national salmonella outbreak.

    In late July, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention even considered reminding the public generally about the dangers of eating undercooked eggs, said Ian Williams, chief of the agency's outbreak response branch. The CDC decided it would be more effective to wait until the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) completed its investigation of the firm, Wright County Egg in Galt, Iowa.

    By late July, the California and Minnesota state health departments had identified several small restaurant outbreaks of salmonella with eggs as a likely culprit — and Wright County Egg as a common supplier, Williams said.

    The FDA didn't contact Wright County Egg until Aug. 10 and didn't provide detailed information until Aug. 12, company spokeswoman Hinda Mitchell said. The recall decision was made after discussion with FDA officials the next morning, she said.

    Jeff Farrar, FDA associate commissioner for food protection, said Wednesday that his agency was aware of the states' findings in late July but needed to obtain detailed copies of invoices and other paperwork to further confirm that Wright County Egg was the supplier.

    CNN also reports this morning the state of California believes it has identified its earliest cases related to the salmonella recall, and says its investigation helped tip off the rest of the country to the source of the problem.

    On May 28 and 29, several people became sick after attending either a prom or a graduation party in Clara County, according to Joy Alexiou, a spokeswoman for the Santa Clara County Public Health Department. Tests on some of the victims, including a catering worker who nibbled on the food, determined that the culprit was salmonella, she said.

    Three months later the state is bragging?

    Sherri McGarry, a director at the F.D.A.’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, told the N.Y. Times last week the Hillandale recall was prompted when Minnesota officials traced a cluster of illnesses in that state to the eggs from the company’s Iowa plants.

    Doug Schultz, a spokesman for the Minnesota health department, said seven people had become ill with salmonella in mid-May after eating chile rellenos at a Mexican restaurant called Mi Rancho in Bemidji, Minn. He said that investigators established a connection to Hillandale eggs on May 24.

    It was not clear why the F.D.A. did not act on the information sooner.

    Why didn’t Minnesota go public if it had information that could limit future illnesses?

    FDA and other federal agencies do themselves a tremendous disservice by failing to clearly articulate how and when the public (and industry) should be informed about potential health risks. No amount of federal legislation or lawsuits will fix this. Instead it requires a recommitment to having fewer people barf. And any company that wants to lead – especially with profits – will stop hiding behind the cloak of government inspection and will make test results public, market food safety at retail so consumers can choose, and if people get sick from your product, will be the first to tell the public.

    You all sound like element’ry penguins.

     

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: August 26th, 2010 - 5:47am by Doug Powell

    The Wall Street Journal reports that the popularity of cooking shows, the eat-local movement and the growth of casual-dining restaurants are reshaping consumers' views of what makes food look appealing. Where making food look perfect was once a primary task of food stylists and photographers, the new challenge is making messy food look appetizing.

    Alison Attenborough, a New York-based food stylist who specializes in editorial work for clients, says, "People are interested in small butchers, artisan producers, farmer's markets—a more handmade look."

    At a recent Food & Wine photo shoot, Ms. Attenborough was making recipes by celebrity chef Tyler Florence for the magazine's October issue. She carefully assembled a cheeseburger so that the bacon and red onions would look like they were erupting from the bun. With a heat gun, she melted the cheese to make a corner of the slice dribble down. For a scallop appetizer, Ms. Attenborough intentionally left one fleck of parsley on the table, as if the cook had just finished applying the garnish and hadn't bothered to clean up.

    Whether for editorial or advertising purposes, the point of making natural food look appealing is to get people to buy the product, go out to eat or make a recipe.

    Brian Wansink, director of the Food and Brand Lab at Cornell University, says the effectiveness of the natural trend lies in its ability to invite the viewer in. "It might enable us more to put ourselves in the picture," he says.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: August 25th, 2010 - 10:12am by Doug Powell

    CNBC reports that experts have some simple advice when it comes to eating runny eggs these days: Run away.

    With salmonella concerns triggering the recall of more than a half-billion eggs in more than a dozen states, warnings are becoming more dire every day against eating undercooked yolks and translucent egg whites.

    But what's a home cook to do, especially when hit by cravings for eggs Benedict, pasta carbonara, homemade Caesar dressing or other dishes that call for raw or only slightly cooked eggs?

    Drinking raw eggs for a protein boost? Even worse idea, given the risk of salmonella and its violent nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and temporary residency in the bathroom.

    "We've got enough issues. Who needs to be barfing because of raw eggs?" asked Douglas Powell, an associate professor of food safety at Kansas State University and author of BarfBlog.com, which highlights food-handling problems in the news and in popular culture.

    He advises cooks to use a food thermometer in their frittatas, quiches and other egg dishes — and, in fact, when preparing meat or anything that poses dangers when undercooked.

    Paul Stern, who cooks for the Hole in the Wall Gang Camp, an Ashford, Conn., camp for seriously ill children, many with compromised immune systems, said this year, the camp switched (before the recall) to pasteurized liquid egg product.

    "I wouldn't be consuming or serving raw eggs any more than I'd be eating or serving raw chicken."
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 25th, 2010 - 8:11am by Doug Powell

    food.safe_.culture.market.jpeg

    Starting a sentence with, ‘well’ may be how people talk but it’s just sloppy writing.

    And terrible writing is proliferating all over the Internet.

    The Whole Story blog of Whole Foods is a favorite target. It must be a challenge to keep getting people to pay a premium for crap.

    Today, they put aside the pretentions and said this is why you should pay more – for crap.

    “Well, our turkey standards prohibit animal by-products in feed and require space for normal turkey behavior. So isn’t it worth it that when a turkey is raised with these standards its meat costs more?”

    I’m interested in turkey that doesn’t make me barf. Can you provide that?

    Seeduction bread or whole wheat sandwich bread made without artificial dough conditioners and preservatives is about 14¢ more per sandwich compared to leading conventional brand whole wheat sandwich bread.

    I’m a fan of chemistry, Is Whole Foods a fan of witchcraft?

    Organic Mustard (and I have no idea why the ingredients are capitalized, must be that unique Whole Foods writing style) helps you avoid exposure to pesticides with your sandwich and is less than 2¢ more per serving.

    Organic is a production standard that has huge tolerances for synthetic chemicals and any kind of so-called natural chemicals.

    Organic Lettuce is another good choice for your health and that of the planet and costs about $1.00 more per head.

    Why? Is it safer? No. Do the production methods extract less of a toll on the soil? No.

    Tomatoes taste best (and have more nutrients) when they are picked ripe, so look for local and in season, as well as organic. Local may cost less, organic about 20% more.

    Food porn, nothing to back this up.

    Lunchmeat that doesn’t contain artificial colors, flavors or preservatives such as added synthetic nitrates or nitrites and from animals raised to meet our animal welfare standards- you get all that for about 25¢ more per slice.

    This has nothing to do with food safety. Whole Foods is familiar with listeria?
     

    Your rating: None (5 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 25th, 2010 - 7:44am by Doug Powell

    I told a state-sponsored jazz radio station yesterday (NPR) and a few dozen other media outlets yesterday that as someone who shops a lot for groceries, I’d be really interested in eggs that were verified through some kind of testing to be salmonella-free. Or reduced levels. Anything but the marketing crap that currently dominates the nation’s grocery shelves.

    People are clamoring for local, natural, sustainable eggs in the wake of a 500 million egg recall that has sickened about 1,000 Americans with salmonella, yet there is absolutely no evidence that other eggs have lower levels of salmonella.

    Buying preferences may help some folks feel superior, but salmonella happens – and it happens a lot. So why is there not a single retailer who will demand salmonella testing and market those results at retail?

    As a consumer, I’m helpless in my choices for reduced-salmonella eggs, unless I buy pasteurized eggs, and even they are not fail-safe. I spend a lot of money at the grocery store feeding the herd of children I seem to have accumulated – why can’t someone give me some microbiological data on which to make a purchasing decision? Having more government inspectors does nothing to assuage my food safety doubts.

    Marketing food safety at retail has the additional benefit of enhancing a food safety culture within an organization – if we’re boasting about this stuff I guess we really better wash our hands and keep the poop out of food. Maintaining a food safety culture means that operators and staff know the risks associated with the products or meals they produce, know why managing the risks is important, and effectively manage those risks in a demonstrable way. In an organization with a good food safety culture, individuals are expected to enact practices that represent the shared value system and point out where others may fail. By using a variety of tools, consequences and incentives, businesses can demonstrate to their staff and customers that they are aware of current food safety issues, that they can learn from others’ mistakes, and that food safety is important within the organization.

    In the egg fiasco, no one is stepping up and saying, we know about salmonella, this is how we go above and beyond the minimal requirements of government, and this is why you should buy my eggs.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
  • Posted: August 24th, 2010 - 7:31pm by Doug Powell

    Traverse City, Michigan, is sorta famous in food safety circles because a 1982 outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 was the first time the bug was identified as a cause of human disease, after 47 people in and Traverse City and White City, Oregon, developed severe stomach disorders after eating hamburgers at McDonald’s outlets.

    Reporting on E. coli O157:H7 in the New York Times began on 8 October 1982 with prompt coverage of this first known outbreak. Researchers at the U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the bacterium associated with the outbreaks was normally killed by cooking. The next day, federal epidemiologists characterized the disease as an intestinal ailment that had not proven fatal and was not a major public health hazard ; yet by Nov. 5, 1982 another 29 cases were reported.

    In 1983, CDC issued a report on the Oregon and Michigan outbreaks and by 1984, the first report on the behavior of the organism and possible control measures appeared.

    Today, the Grand Traverse County Health Department reported it had received reports of three probable cases of shigatoxin-producing E. coli in the past week.

    All cases were in children and all three attended the Northwestern Michigan Fair in Grand Traverse County between August 9 and August 13.

    The onset of symptoms, including bloody diarrhea, were between August 15 and August 17.

    Dr. Michael Collins, Medical Director for the Grand Traverse County Health Department said,

    "Considering the number of animals in close proximity to people at that venue, it seems likely that their infections were contracted there. Though we will probably never know exactly which animal or animals were involved as sources.”

    The water supply at the Fairgrounds was tested prior to the event and will be re-tested for possible contamination. Area physicians were also notified and encouraged to obtain stool cultures for individuals with severe or bloody diarrhea.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: August 24th, 2010 - 6:28pm by Doug Powell

    www.foodsafetyinfosheets.com

    Le U.S. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) est en train d’enquêter sur une éclosion à Salmonella Enteriditis liée aux œufs en coquilles. L’éclosion, qui a débuté en mai et qui est toujours en cours, a entraîné environ plusieurs centaines de malades.

    Les enquêtes auprès de 250 malades en Californie, le Colorado et le Minnesota ont révélé plusieurs restaurants ou lieux où a mangé plus d’une personne malade avec la souche épidémique.

    Les officiels de la santé de Californie ont confirmé que l’éclosion a été tracé jusqu’aux œufs de Wright County Egg à Galt dans l’Iowa, qui a procédé à un rappel estimé à 228 millions d’œufs le 13 août 2010.

    Le rappel comprend des œufs en coquilles conditionnés par Wright County Egg entre le 16 mai et le 13 août 2010. Ils proviennent de caisses en cartons de six à 18 œufs et comprennent les numéros de site P-1026, P-1413 et P-1946.

    •Les œufs peuvent héberger Salmonella et ont besoin d’être cuits à 63°C pendant 15 secondes pour réduire le risque.

    •Les œufs doivent être conservés au réfrigérateur et maintenu en dessous de 7°C.

    •Utiliser des œufs pasteurisés comme solution de remplacement pour des plats nécessitant des œufs crus.

    Les œufs rappelés sont vendus sous de multiples noms de marque :
    Lucerne, Albertson, Mountain Dairy, Ralph's, Boomsma's, Sunshine, Hillandale, Trafficanda, Farm Fresh, Shoreland, Lund, Dutch Farms et Kemps.
     

    Pour plus d’information, contacter Ben Chapman,benjamin_chapman@ncsu.edu ou Doug Powell, dpowell@ksu.edu
     

    Your rating: None
    Salmonella  |  Comments