July 2010

  • Posted: July 31st, 2010 - 1:27pm by Sol Erdozain

    Author: 
    Sol Erdozain

    Ready-to-eat meat products from the above mentioned meat packer company are being recalled due to foodborne pathogens.

    The press release from the CFIA did not mention which foodborne pathogens were involved, or where exactly the products were distributed.

    They do mention that some of the meat may not have the original brand or product name so, “persons who may have purchased these products and do not know the original brand and/or product name are advised to check with their retailer or supplier to determine if they have the affected product.”

    The press release with a list of the products can be found at:

    http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/corpaffr/recarapp/2010/20100731e.shtml
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
  • Posted: July 31st, 2010 - 12:53pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    I'm on my way to the International Association for Food Protection annual meeting in Anaheim; it’s kind of band camp for the food safety nerds. I'm sure that at least once in the next 48 hours, last week's ESPN food-safety-sucks-at-some-stadiums will come up. Demonstrating how mainstream food safety can be, sports talk radio got into the discussion with Mike and Mike in the morning (one of my favorites) carrying a couple of segments on Wednesday (the conversation took a weird turn into a do-you-really-want-to-know about your current partner's sexual history).

    The food safety story on Outside The Lines has caused a ripple effect with journos from pretty well every town that hosts a major sports team reported on the local angle. The response to the stories is following a predictable cycle: expose, local digging, canned responses from the operators.

    The Detroit Free Press ran some of the statements, including the below from the food service operator at the Palace of Auburn Hills:

    “We are committed to food safety in our operations, and we have a solid food-safety and sanitation program in place to provide the proper employee training, safety procedures and food-handling techniques required to meet or exceed our standards, as well as those of the local health department. We anticipate the health department’s regular visits as another set of eyes to ensure our operations are delivering consistent, safe experiences for our fans.”

    Ho-hum. Of course you are committed to food safety and it’s your number one priority, what food proprietor would publicly say anything different? The responses all get kind of boring after awhile. Why aren’t the stadium and arena dudes consulting with the facility’s entertainment brethren (the folks who run the scoreboards and jumbotron) grab a video camera, hit the kitchens Blair Witch-style and give patrons and fans a tour to show exactly what “number one priority” means and throw it up on YouTube.
     
    The statement from Joe Louis Arena was better, admitting problems, describing corrections and telling a more complete story about the food safety system. But they end by saying “Our guests can be very confident that we are vigilant in ensuring the highest standard of quality and safety in all the products proudly served during our events.” A better tactic would be to show patrons, explain why you do what you do (that means talking about risks) and let them decide whether they can be confident.
     
     

     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
  • Posted: July 31st, 2010 - 7:16am by Doug Powell

    In a few weeks we’ll be leaving for a month of seaside (Gulf-side) writing in Florida.

    As food safety dude and axman Roy Costa has pointed out, I sure hope I don’t end up in a Florida hospital, because no one is doing food inspections.

    The Department of Health told Associated Press yesterday it's working with other agencies to figure out who will handle inspections at the state's 286 hospitals and 671 nursing homes. Meanwhile, the Department of Children & Families is temporarily taking over the inspection of day-care centers, which were also part of the cuts.

    The health department had been inspecting facilities four times a year until Gov. Charlie Crist signed a bill (HB 5311) stopping them. Experts say people at these facilities are the most vulnerable for foodborne illnesses.

    DCF Secretary George Sheldon said his agency decided to fill the gap at day cares and will temporarily oversee inspections because ``it was the right thing to do.''

    DCF employees already inspect day-care facilities for safety issues. Sheldon said the Legislature was trying to consolidate inspections to prevent multiple state agencies from visiting the same facilities to inspect different standards.

    The health department inspected more than 15,000 day-care centers last year, finding nearly 12,000 violations, including food from unsafe sources, poor hygiene and contaminated equipment.

    I don’t really care who inspects as long as there is accountability in the system through -- at a minimum -- public availability of results and mandatory training for anyone who handles and prepares food.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 31st, 2010 - 6:47am by Doug Powell

    There’s a beach closed somewhere every summer day, usually because of high E. coli counts, often linked to some form of sewage. I don’t report on the closings although am sympathetic if it’s your beach.

    But when the beach at Diamond Point Park in Bemidji, Minnesota, was closed Thursday, I paid attention, because three swimmers seem to have acquired not the fecal coliform, but the far more dangerous E. coli O157:H7.

    The Minnesota Department of Health spokesman Doug Schultz said three people became ill July 12 and July 13 from E. coli, and health officials have now determined that the common link was that all three had visited the beach sometime from July 8-11, adding,

    "We would be looking for other possibilities, like food sources. But the common link appeared to be just the fact that they were swimming."

    Minnesota Public Radio News reported that all three of those who became ill from the E. coli O157:H7 were hospitalized, and one person developed a complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome, which can affect the kidneys and can be fatal.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 31st, 2010 - 6:20am by Doug Powell

    Whenever I go to a cottage or a camp – rare these days -- I always ask about the water source, how often it is tested and whether it is chlorinated. Most people can readily answer; some can’t.

    County and state health officials on Friday said several people have become ill after consuming water from a privately owned public water supply near Hebgen Lake, Montana (right, exactly as shown).

    The Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services has confirmed 14 cases of campylobacter gastrointestinal illness. Information collected about the cases "strongly suggests that exposure occurred at the Campfire Lodge Resort," according to the statement. At least 70 more cases are considered "probable."
    Along with county health agents and DPHHS, the Montana Department of

    The owners of the resort are cooperating with the probe, and have taken action to prevent future illnesses.


    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 7:54pm by Doug Powell

    From Perez Hilton:

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 6:00pm by Doug Powell

    Mugshot hall-of-famer and deliberate vomiter on other people at baseball games, Matthew Clemmens, 21 (right, exactly as shown), was sent to prison for at least 30 days, given two years probation, and ordered to serve 50 hours of community service, and pay $315 in restitution after the incident.

    Reuters cited the district attorney's office as saying in a statement that,

    "Clemmens pleaded guilty to making himself throw up on a young girl at a Phillies game.”

    USA Today reported in April, 2010, the barf started brewing when the man’s friend was kicked out of the stadium after the police captain complained to security about their drunktard ways which included cursing and spitting at people. When the man’s friend was escorted out of the place, he retaliated by putting his fingers down his throat and barfing all over an off-duty police captain and his 11-year-old daughter.

    When police arrived to arrest the man, he spewed on another officer. In addition to attacking the officers with the insides of his stomach the man also punched a couple of cops.

    Baseball is so boring.

    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 5:24pm by Doug Powell

    Republican National Committee Chairman and Muppet impersonator Michael Steele had to cancel an appearance today before a national meeting of black journalists because of a bad case of food poisoning.

    A RNC spokesman said in an email to CNN,

    "While traveling out West the Chairman came down with a bad case of food poisoning. He is disappointed to miss the opportunity to take part in this valuable dialogue and looks forward to engaging with NABJ in the very near future."

    The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
    Steele Crazy After All These Years
    www.thedailyshow.com
    Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party
    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Celebrity  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 4:59pm by Doug Powell

    In the wake of several high-profile outbreaks of foodborne illness at catered events – 180 people barfing after 3 events prepared by an unlicensed caterer in North Dakota last year, and 57 people barfing at events at an Illinois catering hall this monthMSNBC reports today catered events make more people sick than outbreaks involving meals at restaurants or prepared at home.

    Uh-huh.

    The story says that new figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control “show that illnesses from reported outbreaks of food poisoning linked to catering outpace those from restaurants or home cooking. 36 illnesses per catering outbreak; 13 at restaurants or home-prepared meals.

    Between 1998 and 2008, there were 833 outbreaks of foodborne illness traced to caterers, incidents that sparked 29,738 illnesses, 345 hospitalizations and 4 deaths, according to Dana Cole, a CDC researcher.

    Proportionately, the outbreaks from catering are higher than the 22,600 illnesses from 1,546 reported home cooking outbreaks and the 101,907 illnesses from 7,921 outbreaks in restaurants and delis.

    “Partly that’s because at larger banquets and weddings the number of people served tend to be larger,” Cole said.

    Uh-huh.

    I hadn’t heard about this new data, and can’t comment on its validity because it hasn’t, as far as I can tell, been published anywhere. One, Dana Cole, and a couple of others from CDC are scheduled to present results next Tuesday at the annual meeting of the International Association for Food Protection in a talk entitled, Sources and settings: contaminated food vehicles and the settings of foodborne disease outbreaks.

    Usually the media stuff happens after the data is at least presented, and preferably after the paper is peer-reviewed and published. I look forward to reading the scoring system the researchers uses: if spinach is contaminated on a farm with E. coli O157:H7 and makes people barf after eating at a catered event, a restaurant, or a home, how is that scored? And does it matter?

    Jacob, C.J. and Powell, D.A. 2009. Where does foodborne illness happen—in the home, at foodservice, or elsewhere—and does it matter? Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 6(9): 1121-1123.
    http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/fpd.2008.0256

    

Foodservice professionals, politicians, and the media are often cited making claims as to which locations most often expose consumers to foodborne pathogens. Many times, it is implied that most foodborne illnesses originate from food consumed where dishes are prepared to order, such as restaurants or in private homes. The manner in which the question is posed and answered frequently reveals a speculative bias that either favors homemade or foodservice meals as the most common source of foodborne pathogens. Many answers have little or no scientific grounding, while others use data compiled by passive surveillance systems. Current surveillance systems focus on the place where food is consumed rather than the point where food is contaminated. Rather than focusing on the location of consumption—and blaming consumers and others—analysis of the steps leading to foodborne illness should center on the causes of contamination in a complex farm-to-fork food safety system.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 2:25pm by Michelle Mazur

    Author: 
    Michelle Mazur

    I find it physically impossible for me to get enough animal interaction. I suppose that means I must’ve chosen the right profession: Veterinary Medicine. I’m a frequent patron of Sunset Zoo here in Manhattan, Kansas, but during my last visit I was sad to learn that the petting zoo area was sectioned off from the public. Zoo patrons are still able to go up to the fence to pet the goats, but they can no longer walk amongst them in their enclosure. I have no idea if this change had to do with any of the recent petting zoo outbreaks, but I suppose it’s a step in the right direction for public health.

     I still love going to petting zoos, though they have quite a bad rap these days. The most memorable petting zoo outbreak that comes to mind is of the E. coli O157 outbreak at the Godstone Farm petting zoo that sickened 93.
     
    The large number of sick kids resulted from a combination of poor food safety information and slow reporting by health officials. There are quite a lot of petting zoos that do things wrong, such as not providing access to handwashing stations after animal interaction. This past weekend I visited a petting zoo in St. Louis, and I was pleased to see some food safety signs posted outside the gate of the animal area and also by the handwashing station right next to the animals.
     
     
    The petting zoo I visited was inside of http://www.grantsfarm.com, a historic plot of land within St. Louis formerly owned by Gen. Grant and currently operated by the Busch family. The petting zoo was entirely made up of goats, and for a few dollars patrons could purchase a baby bottle full of milk to feed to the goats. The handwashing stations with soap and water right next to the exits satisfied my public health concerns. However, I would’ve been happier with paper towels for drying rather than the hand dryers that were available.
     
    I was also happy about the signs posted around the petting zoo that read,
     
    In accordance with the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, we provide hand washing stations, antibacterial soap, warm water, and air hand dryers for visitors to our animal interaction areas. Additionally, petting brushes are available to reduce hand contact with the animals.
     
    Posted below was,
     
    Pregnant women, senior citizens and immunocompromised persons are at higher risk of serious infections. When contacting animals, Grant’s Farm suggests heightened precautions, and children under 5 years be closely supervised.
     
    Of course these signs were nice to have around, but it doesn’t mean anything if parents don’t read them. Unfortunately I saw quite a few kids with their hands in their mouths inside the petting enclosure. I think Grant’s Farm did a good job of informing the public of the risks while still encouraging people to pet the animals. The petting brushes are a germ-a-phobe’s dream, though I didn’t use one.
     
    All in all, the kids had a blast and the goats were fed. And now I have 52 pictures of goats on my camera.
    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Handwashing  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 11:53am by Doug Powell

    Food is 21st century snake oil.

    And shopping for food can be so confusing.

    Natural, organic, local, antioxidants, welfare-friendly, whole wheat made predominantly with white flour, hormone-free, hucksterism of whatever kind.

    Juliana Barbassa of Associated Press reports today that a disagreement among poultry producers about whether chicken injected with salt, water and other ingredients can be promoted as "natural" has prompted federal officials to consider changing labeling guidelines.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture had maintained that if chicken wasn't flavored artificially or preserved with chemicals, it could carry the word "natural" on the package.

    But the agency agreed to take another look at its policy after some producers, politicians and health advocates noted that about one-third of chicken sold in the U.S. was injected with additives that could represent up to 15 percent of the meat's weight, doubling or tripling its sodium content. Some argue that could mislead or potentially harm consumers who must limit their salt intake.

    The USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service plans to issue new proposed rules this fall.

    Perdue, the nation's third largest poultry producer, is among those pushing for a change. The company has joined a group called the Truthful Labeling Coalition, which has hired a lobbyist and launched an advertising campaign.

    The two largest chicken processors, Pilgrim's Pride and Tyson Foods, are among those that affix "natural" labels to chicken injected with extra salt and water.

    A buyer perusing the chicken counter at a San Francisco supermarket agreed.

    Muembo Muanza, 30, said he read the label and considered the price but never thought to check the salt content when buying fresh chicken.

    "If it says natural, I expect it to be all natural - nothing but chicken," he said.

    I’d be more interested if food-types would start marketing based on microbial food safety.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 11:10am by Doug Powell

    Audit creep is not something Chapman was knowingly called while visiting farms – maybe behind his back.

    For this story, audit creep refers to the expanding inclusion of more requirements on growers of fresh produce, many which have nothing to do with food safety. The Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association explains excetpts below from a submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on ways to improve preventative controls for produce safety (thanks to Tom Karst of The Packer for continuing to keep his eye on comments being submitted).

    Food safety has long been a crucial part of GFVGA with the creation of the Georgia Good Agricultural Practice Food Safety Program (GA GAP) in 2000. We provide food safety education to producers across the southeast at various conferences as well as one-on-one farm visits. The GA GAP program also helps in the implementation of food safety plans, documentation and training on farms and in packing facilities as well as preparing producers for third party food safety audits.

    Currently, there are more than 75 farms or packing facilities that have passed a certified third party food safety audit through the GA GAP program. We have provided one-on-one food safety training at approximately 300 farms and packing facilities across the southeast.

    The 1998 FDA document, Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables, has served as the basis for food safety policy in the United States. It has allowed our nation and the produce industry to set a foundation from which sound, safe farming and handling practices were established.

    The Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association supports a federal food safety policy. Federal oversight is seen as the only way to establish and enforce a level playing field for all parts of the industry from producer to broker, retail chain to consumer.

    In the current situation with no federal oversight, the food safety industry is decided by each retail supplier, food service organization, or brokerage firm. In 1998 there were no problems with food safety audit company checklists drifting far from the common foundation of the new FDA guidance. As consumers became more educated about their food and food sources and technology allowed for more quickly identifying food borne illness clusters, retail organizations began asking for more stringent food safety standards to lower their liability and tout their safer food supply.

    They also began to demand the inclusion of non-food safety related materials such as business practices and sustainability on third party food safety audits. These tighter standards and non-food safety related demands are not bad, however they are not based on any science or industry practice; simply the idea that more is better.

    Over the past twelve years this “audit creep” has continued and audit company’s marketing teams and delivery systems have grown more sophisticated. Many retail chains will pick one audit company format and require all suppliers use that service. Many of the larger producer, packer, shipper operations with multiple customers must undergo multiple audits.

    Research has shown all audits contain 85% to 90% of the same questions. This proves to be a monetary, personnel, and time burden as audits begin at $750 (not including auditor travel expenses), audits last on average one to one and a half days and the auditor must be accompanied at all times during the audit. Food safety is no longer a small piece of the marketing program but an integral cog in the entire operation.

    The common message from grower members of GFVGA is they see the value of food safety programs and are willing to make the necessary changes. What growers do not like is having the audit standards change year to year. Many of the grower’s customers will require one audit company and format one year and change to a different required audit company and format the second year. While most of the information is encompassed in their food safety, the difference in audit format, audit expectation, different metrics and constant change takes time and money.

    The Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association supports a common foundation with the updating of the 1998 FDA guidance. We feel any federal food safety program, guidance and/or oversight should consist of science based regulations. This is one area that will require substantial time and resources as the research is simply not available. One example is water quality. In the absence of definitive microbial standards for irrigation water, the authors of the California Leafy Greens Market Agreement Best Practices Document have chosen to use the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s recreational water standards. Scientific research is needed to show if these standards are appropriate for irrigation water. …

    The expense of a food safety program is not in implementing the program, changes and documentation. The expense is in having a third party audit. If federal guidance does not require a private audit from a third party, much of the monetary anxieties are taken away. An argument can be made that a smaller operation has less literal hands involved and can be more closely monitored. However E. coli and other harmful bacteria do not know whether they are in a 2 acre field or 200 acre field. Having a food safety program in place with documentation to remind and ensure Good Agricultural and Handling Practices are used is beneficial for all farms and consumers.”

    Respectfully submitted,
    Beth Bland
    Director of Education and Food Safety
    Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association

     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 30th, 2010 - 10:11am by Doug Powell

    “I never thought that a mouse could have salmonella. It just never entered my mind.”

    So says Steve Gilfillan, 51, a deputy sheriff in Council Bluffs, Iowa, who, according to the New York Times this morning, keeps “a couple hundred” garter snakes in several neat rows of roomy enclosures in his basement. The snakes, he said, are like part of the family, which leads to a certain familiarity.

    “As far as precautions, I don’t know,” said Mr. Gilfillan, adding his three children helped feed and care for his pets. “Snakes got to eat and snakes got to poop and you got to clean it up. It’s just the nature of keeping them.”

    More than 400 people, many of them snake owners or their children, in the United States and Britain, have been sickened by salmonella outbreaks, all traced to frozen mice sold over the Internet as food for exotic pets by a small Georgia company called MiceDirect.

    The company announced this week a recall involving millions of frozen mice and said that it would begin irradiating future shipments to kill infectious bacteria.

    MiceDirect also recalled frozen rats and baby chickens used as pet food by reptile fanciers, although those products had not been linked to the salmonella outbreaks.

    Health officials said that owners of reptiles should be mindful that such pets, including snakes and turtles, often carry salmonella and have been the cause of outbreaks in the past. Rodents carry similar risks, whether kept as pets or used as food for other animals.

    Snakes can become infected after eating tainted mice, although the snakes may show no signs of illness, said Dr. Casey Barton Behravesh, a veterinarian and epidemiologist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Snake owners can become sick from handling the frozen or thawed mice, handling infected snakes or cleaning feces from an enclosure.

    Mr. Gilfillan and many other snake owners thaw mice to serving temperature in warm water. Dr. Barton Behravesh said people should not use a microwave oven, because the bacteria could spread to other food.

    She also said that mice and reptiles should be kept out of the kitchen and away from areas where food is served. Reptile cages should not be cleaned in the kitchen sink, she said, and mice should not be kept in a freezer with food for humans.

    And she said that reptile owners should wash their hands thoroughly after handling their pets or the rodents the pets eat.

    The first salmonella outbreak linked to MiceDirect began in Great Britain in August 2008. Since then, more than 400 people have fallen ill there, about two-thirds of them have been children under 10, according to Chris Lane, a senior epidemiologist of the Health Protection Agency’s Center for Infections in London. Although the shipments of tainted mice were halted last year, people continue to get sick there, Mr. Lane said.

    The first case in the United States appeared in January 2010, according Dr. Barton Behravesh. The C.D.C. has identified more than 30 cases in 17 states with the same strain as the British outbreak. She said the cases were not concentrated in one region but spread across the country. Half the victims were under 12.
    Accounts from both sides of the Atlantic suggest that American authorities were slow to react to indications of a problem.

    British investigators looking into the outbreak found that many of the victims came from families where snakes were kept as pets. They eventually began looking at the frozen mice fed to the snakes and found shipments from MiceDirect that contained the same strain of salmonella as that isolated from the victims.

    British officials contacted MiceDirect, Mr. Lane said, and the company promised to act to prevent further contamination.

    On July 21, 2010, the F.D.A. told the company that tests of its products and plant had found salmonella. Two days later, the agency said, MiceDirect agreed to a recall.

    But the recall effort has been haphazard. The company’s recall notice was not prominently posted on its Web site until Thursday. And neither the company’s site nor the F.D.A.’s site gave clear instructions on what to do with mice that customers still had.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 29th, 2010 - 10:23pm by Doug Powell

    KNTV 13 Action News in Las Vegas continues its weekly dirty dining segment, this time focusing on Diamond China on Sahara near Valley View, which received 57 demerits in a recent inspection, and was closed by the Southern Nevada Health District.

    Pictures taken by the Health District show raw meat thawing next to scallops and mixing juices. Beef was also found thawing with fish. Raw duck was found hanging next to and touching what inspectors call a dirty shelf.
    Inspectors say a worker prepared chicken and never washed his hands before moving on to cut some fish. Dirty dishes filled the hand sink making it unusable.
    The report says, "Servers, cook prep, cook never washed hands at all during inspection."

    Diamond China reopened with an A rating after it was inspected again.

    Diamond China has been open for 13 years. This is third time it has been shut down since opening.

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
  • Posted: July 29th, 2010 - 9:49pm by Doug Powell

    Chicago Breaking News reports that at least four people were hospitalized and 53 others reported illnesses after attending wedding parties this month at a banquet hall in south suburban Mokena, Illinois, leading Will County health officials to try to determine the cause.

    The Health Department is looking for others who may have gotten sick after attending weddings at Di Nolfo's Banquet Inn and Catering on July 16 and 17.

    Health officials believe the source of the illness is norovirus. Health officials collected and tested food from Di Nolfo's, 9425 W. 191st Street, but did not find any significant violations. None of Di Nolfo's employees have reported illnesses, officials said.
     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Norovirus  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 29th, 2010 - 1:44pm by Doug Powell

    That’s Sorenne (right, pretty much as shown) enjoying a duck egg omelet made with duck eggs from our friend, Kate the vet. Kate is exceedingly conscientious about cleanliness and I take pains to avoid cross-contamination in the kitchen.

    The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) today reissued its advice on the safe consumption of duck eggs, following the confirmation of five new cases of Salmonella Typhimurium DT8.

    The FSAI states that these five cases are in addition to the thirteen cases associated with duck egg consumption during an outbreak earlier in the year.

    It is reiterating its advice to consumers to only consume duck eggs that have been thoroughly cooked and to cease using raw duck eggs in any dishes that will not be cooked thoroughly prior to eating. It continues to recommend that good hygiene practices are followed, such as washing hands and preparation surfaces after handling or using duck eggs.

    In light of these new cases, the FSAI advises caterers to be particularly strict in adhering to best hygiene practices and to only serve duck eggs or duck egg products that have been thoroughly cooked prior to consumption. It also reiterates the need for strict procedures to be followed at all times to avoid cross contamination between raw and cooked foods.

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 29th, 2010 - 9:23am by Doug Powell

    In Jan. 2010, Michelle blogged about the popularity of squirrel meat in the U.K. and someone commented,

    “I live in the U.K. and have never ever seen squirrel being sold in any supermarket or shop and would be quite surprised if I ever did! As far as I’m aware its not popular at all.”

    The Daily Mail reports this morning that a British supermarket has started selling squirrel, and is reporting "huge interest" in the cheap and healthy meat.

    Grey squirrel meat is high in protein and low in fat, and is selling for just £3 ($5.25) at budget supermarket Budgens, reports.

    Once a staple of English cooking, squirrel is said to have a nutty flavour and can be cooked in soups, pies and casseroles.

    The North London branch of the supermarket selling the meat said there had been "huge interest" but admitted that more customers were looking rather than buying so far.

    Animal welfare group Viva has accused Budgens of cashing in on a "massacre" by putting grey squirrel back on the menu, with founder Juliet Gellatley saying,

    "If this store is attempting to stand out from the crowd by selling squirrel, the only message they are giving out is that they are happy to have the blood of a beautiful wild animal on their hands for the sake of a few quid.”

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 28th, 2010 - 5:59pm by Doug Powell

    I have a friend who was a dairy farmer for decades and he refused to eat at McDonald’s.

    He likes hamburgers and all, he just couldn’t stand the thought of his spent Holsteins being served as a Big Mac.

    Some types in the Australian beef industry feel the same way.

    The Courier Mail in Brisbane reports that backers of truth-in-labeling legislation aimed at ensuring old cow meat is clearly labeled as such are concerned industry representatives will succeed in destroying the intent of the legislation.

    They are worried that a register being drawn up in response to the legislation will only make buying beef in the supermarket even more confusing for consumers.

    Once passed, the terminology would apply to meat sold in supermarkets and butchers around the country.

    Consultant to the truth-in-labelling legislation, Norman Hunt, said vested industry interests who did not want consumers to realize they were buying beef from old cows were to blame.

    The Aus-Meat domestic retail beef register, drawn up earlier this month, is proposing to change the much-maligned "budget" label, used to describe beef from cattle 10 years old, to "economy".

    Under existing law in Queensland, abattoirs must label old cow meat "manufacturing" grade but retailers are then able to market it as prime cut under the "budget" grading.

    Government adviser, Red Meat Advisory Council secretary Justin Toohey said it was impossible to provide a guide to eating quality of meat to consumers based on a whole of animal approach, adding,

    "The trouble is every muscle has to be graded individually for this sort of thing to be a success. An eye-fillet from an eight-tooth cow could be beautiful eating, for example."

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 28th, 2010 - 5:26pm by Doug Powell

    Health Canada is reminding Canadians that raw or undercooked sprouts should not be eaten by children, older adults, pregnant women or those with weakened immune systems.

    Health Canada used to say raw sprouts should be avoided if concerned about illness, but now they are more direct. That 2005 outbreak in Ontario involving more than 648 cases of Salmonella linked to mung bean sprouts may have something to do with the newfound directness.

    Fresh produce can sometimes be contaminated with harmful bacteria while in the field or during storage or handling. This is particularly a concern with sprouts. Many outbreaks of Salmonella and E. coli infections have been linked to contaminated sprouts.

    Children, older adults, pregnant women and those with weakened immune systems are particularly vulnerable to these bacteria and should not eat any raw sprouts at all. They should also avoid eating cooked sprouts unless they can be sure the sprouts have been thoroughly cooked.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Raw Food  |  Comments
  • Posted: July 28th, 2010 - 12:46pm by Doug Powell

    A small deli in Long Island City, Queens, will go down in local history as being the first business to earn a Grade A from the city's health department, which implemented its new restaurant inspection grading system on Tuesday.

    Crain’s New York Business (photo from Crain's) reports the agency is holding a press conference Wednesday morning at Spark's Deli on 2831 Borden Ave., where health commissioner Dr. Thomas Farley will laud the small business's accomplishment.

    Co-owner Jose Araujo said,

    “We serve a lot of hard-working people, construction crews and mechanics. And now they'll know for sure that I provide good food. … We've done well in past inspections. There's always something to fix or be done better, but we've never failed an inspection.”

    On Tuesday an inspector visited his business, awarding him with a score of 10.

    According to the new letter grading system, in which restaurants receive either an A, B or C grade (or fail the inspection altogether), a score of 0 to 13 qualifies as an A.

    Other restaurants were inspected on Tuesday and earned A's, but Spark's was the first, according to health department officials.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)