April 2008

  • Posted: April 9th, 2008 - 9:26pm by Doug Powell

    After three weeks of a boil-water advisory, the 8,500 residents were hoping for the all-clear today, so they could have a shower, brush their teeth, and maybe even a glass of water without hauling 5-gallon carboys of water around the house.

    Oh-oh.

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, called in to help with the outbreak of Salmonellas that has so far sickened 389, found two different parasites -- giardia and cryptosporidium -- present in the water system before it was flushed with high doses of chlorine last week.

    The city remains on a "boil order" requiring residents to boil water before drinking it or using it for cooking.

    A thorough investigation into the intricacies of a municipal water supply becoming contaminated can be found in the Walkerton Commission of Inquiry, held after E. coli O157:H7 got into the water supply of Walkerton, Ontario in 2000, sickening half the town of 5,000 and killing seven.
    Your rating: None
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 9th, 2008 - 3:36pm by Doug Powell

    Meatingplace.com was first to report on plans by USDA to start testing ground beef and ground beef component samples for non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli (STECs) to determine whether to declare them adulterants.

    (A couple of relevant outbreak tables involving non-O157 STECs are available at:
    http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/2007/10/articles/e-coli/nono157-stec-meeting/)

    Officials from USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service told about 200 participants at a public meeting on Wednesday the agency will test both samples that test positive and those that test negative for E. coli O157:H7, but production lots will not be recalled, seized or detained if they only test positive for non-O157 STECs. The data is being generated only for study purposes at this time.

    USDA will issue a public notice to announce a start date, which has not been determined. FSIS Deputy Assistant Administrator Daniel Engeljohn said the agency will assess the testing data "over a limited timeframe sufficient to ascertain the general likelihood of the presence of selected non-O157 STECs."

    "Based on the evidence that we develop from our testing, as well as other available evidence, we will decide whether to declare selected non-O157 STECs to be adulterants," he said in a presentation prepared for the group.

    Elizabeth Hagen, FSIS executive associate for Public Health, said the testing will focus on six groups of E. coli bacteria — O26, O111, O103, O121, O45 and O145 — which are responsible for 75 percent of non-O157 illnesses. She noted the true incidence of non-O157 human illness is difficult to define, due to limited awareness and non-uniform surveillance. Outbreaks worldwide have been associated with varied non-food and food vehicles, including meat.

    While USDA has not yet decided to declare the non-O157 STECs adulterants, Engeljohn outlined the process if the agency does. The agency would:

        * define applicable products from slaughter/dressing and further processing operations
        * issue a Federal Register Notice in the form of an interpretive rule
        * establish an effective date that ensures sufficient time to address seamless implementation for both domestic and imported products
        * issue compliance guidelines
        * issue policy implementation instructions and train FSIS inspection personnel
        * conduct outreach to the regulated industry.

    Well aware of the controversy these and other proposed actions are likely to generate, FSIS Under Secretary Richard Raymond opened the meeting by saying, "You certainly may hear things you don't agree with…Progress won't occur if we're just wanting to avoid discomfort by maintaining the old status quo. The E. coli bug is obviously not satisfied with the status quo and neither should we be."


    More to follow.
    Your rating: None
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 9th, 2008 - 3:15pm by

    A Six Flags water park and resort complex in up-state New York known as "Great Escapes", is the focus of a large norovirus outbreak.  Norovirus is transmitted from infected human carriers to food, water, and environmental surfaces. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognize noroviruses (and related viral strains) as the leading cause of foodborne illness in the US. The gastrointestinal illness is highly communicable and easily spread by hand to hand contact and even through the air. Outbreaks occur in resorts and other facilities when ill persons contaminate the environment, food and water through vomit and feces. Rapid and effective measures well-known to the public health community are needed to stop transmission. Many of these measures are developed by the US Public Health Service. Cruise lines have experienced many norovirus outbreaks and therefor there is much known about the pathogen and how to address it.

    Untimely Responses to the Problem
    According to the local health department a case of norovirus at the Great Escapes is defined as a person with norovirus symptoms at the resort on or after March 7, 2008. The health department  therefore belives the date of March 7 was the beginning of the outbreak, but did not for some unexplained reason begin an investigation for ten days. It is not known to this writer when the operator of the facility was first aware of that employees and patrons were becoming ill. We are also unaware of how or when the health department was officially notified of the problem. The official coordinated response to this outbreak began on March 17, a full 10 days after the outbreak apparently began. By March 21, there were already 200 cases. The number of reported cases eventually reached at least 435 as news of the incident spread.

    Rapid tests using sophisticated molecular testing platforms are available to provide confirming results of norovirus infection in 24 hours, yet investigators over 1 week into the investigation still didn't have a confirming diagnosis from the state lab.  The slow state lab results were an unnecessary delay, as approved private labs are available.

    Early recognition of this problem is critical. Once it is known that norovirus is in the environment, investigators can implement timely and appropriate sanitation and safety precautions to combat transmission. One example of appropriate response was the closing of the food service. But this only occured after numerous employees of the kitchen reported symptoms of norovirus. The pools, food and lodging facilities are undoubtedly contaminated. Delay in the the implementation of this and other preventive measures at this public, regulated facility likely increased the potential for the exposure of large numbers of unsuspecting people to the pathogen over several days. The licensed operator's delay in recognizing and reporting a large number of ill patrons and staff to authorities, the response of the authorities once notified, and the timeliness and effectiveness of prevention measures taken are critical questions.

    Lawsuit
    Four members of a family sickened by the resort have filed a lawsuit. Key issues that must be scrutinized are the delay between the start of the outbreak and notification of the health authorities, the large number of food service staff ill and whether they worked while ill, the basis for the decision to close the kitchen, and the basis for management's decision to allow the rest of the facility to remain open..

    Unanswered Questions
    A detailed analysis of the cases and their relationships to the food service or other environmental exposures will be key to determining the causes of this large and serious outbreak and whether the operator responded in an effective and timely manner to protect both it's employees and guests.

    Could the large number of cases of illness been reduced if more timely and effective prevention measures were implemented at Great Escapes?

    To read more, select the links below.

    Health Department official statement Norovirus at Great Escapes Water Park
    1st article from the Post Star. March 21st, 200 cases reported
    2nd article from the Post Star, March 16th, 435 cases  reported
    Channel 6 report. Lawsuits filed.

    --
    Mr. Costa is a professor at the Walt Disney World Center for Hospitality and the Culinary Arts at Valencia College in Orlando, Florida and is the founder and owner of the consulting firm Environ Health Associates, Inc.  Mr. Costa is a registered professional sanitarian with 30 years of environmental heath practice in the academic, government and private sectors.

    For our manual on Norovirus Contamination and Control send an email to rcosta1@cfl.rr.com
    Your rating: None
    Norovirus  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 8th, 2008 - 9:20am by Doug Powell

    People concerned about hospital cleanliness in the U.K. are being urged to challenge health workers on whether they have washed their hands.

    Andrew Pike, chief executive of South East Essex Primary Care Trust, said,

    "We would encourage people using health services to question any healthcare worker, whether in hospital or the community, if they have washed their hands."

    Handwashing public service announcements from the International Food Safety Network are available at:





    http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/2008/03/articles/handwashing/handwashing-public-service-announcements/
    Your rating: None
    Handwashing  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 8th, 2008 - 8:02am by Ben Chapman

    The April 2008 issue of Journal of Food Protection contains a cool paper on a survey of Salmonella and E. coli at a greenhouse tomato farm in Mexico. During 2003 and 2004 the authors sampled over 1600 product and environmental samples, before, during and after a couple of environmental disturbances: a flood and the entry of wild animals (opossums, mice and sparrows).

    The authors isolated Salmonella Montevideo, Salmonella Newport, and strains of the F serogroup  from tomatoes and go on to state that almost all of the Salmonella Newport strains were isolated from samples collected during or immediately after the flood.

    Analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed that some Salmonella Montevideo isolates from tomatoes, opossums, and mice displayed identical genetic patterns, suggesting that these wild animals represented a potential source of contamination.

    The fun part of paper is that the authors suggest that dirty work shoes were also thought to be an important vehicle for dissemination of Salmonella into (and possibly throughout) the greenhouses (especially after being worn during the flood incident):

    Contaminated worker shoes may be vehicles for contamination with enteric pathogens, from either outside the greenhouses or from one facility to another. The levels of E. coli on personal shoes were higher than those of working  shoes were before the flood. However, there was a higher  level of contamination with Salmonella and E. coli on  working shoes compared with personal shoes after the flood.

    The authors go on to say that sanitary mats intended to reduce pathogen movement may not be all that effective the real-world application:

    Working shoes were provided by management to the workers to wear inside the greenhouse at the suggestion of our research group after finding that personal shoes were positive for E. coli, even after shoes received a disinfection treatment with quaternary salts solution (800 ppm) on a sanitary mat. However, working shoes were not used exclusively inside the greenhouse, but were also worn to go from one facility to another. Shoes have seldom been mentioned as vehicles of contamination in food production areas. This dissemination mechanism of enteric pathogens should be considered as an important control point  during working procedures in greenhouses.

    It's unclear whether this is just a notable finding, or if it represents a real risk in moving pathogens around food production systems, and needs some further investigation.  Probably don't want to use boots to stomp garlic though.

    Your rating: None
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 7th, 2008 - 11:37pm by Doug Powell

    The fans have taken to the streets 90 miles east of Manhattan (Kansas) in Lawrence, celebrating the dramatic come-from-behind-overtime KU victory over Memphis in the U.S. men's college basketball championship tonight.

    People on TV swarming the streets in Lawrence are saying this is the happiest moment of their entire lives.

    Ahem …

    Being Canadian, I don't get all the intra-state rivalry; this KU logo may draw more vigorous complaints than Honduran cantaloupes.

    But I say, good for Kansas. And besides, Kansas State was one of three teams that actually beat KU this season.

    Now, about that hockey arena …
    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 7th, 2008 - 10:13pm by Doug Powell

    Careful with that hedgehog, Eugene, especially in New Zealand.

    The Herald on Sunday say police alleged that William Singalargh, 27, picked up the hedgehog and threw it at a 15-year-old boy in the North Island east coast town of Whakatane on February 9.

    Police Senior Sgt. Bruce Jenkins said Monday,

    "It hit the victim in the leg, causing a large, red welt and several puncture marks."

    Police arrested Singalargh shortly after the incident, and charged him with assault with a weapon -- the hedgehog.

    The Herald said the hedgehog was dead when it was collected as evidence, but did not know if it was dead or alive at the time of the alleged attack.

    The Herald reported Singalargh's arrest under the headline "Raise your hands and step away from the hedgehog."
    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 6th, 2008 - 7:09am by Doug Powell

    London's Sunday Times ran a little puff piece -- and with spring coming in the Northern Hemisphere there will be many more -- that said food safety problems are primarily caused by eating food already past its shelf life, cross-contamination between raw and cooked foods (often involving poor hygiene) and eating food that was either not cooked or not stored properly.

    Um, fresh fruits are vegetables are the leading vehicles of foodborne illness today.

    Simple precautions include avoiding cooking food that’s about to go off and making sure you dry your hands properly after washing them – far more bacteria are spread from damp hands than dry hands.


    The story cites the U.K. Food Standards Agency as a source for additional information. FSA tells folks,

    "If you are checking a burger, sausage, or a portion of chicken or pork, cut into the middle and check there is no pink meat left. The meat should also be piping hot in the middle. If you're checking a whole chicken or other bird, pierce the thickest part of the leg (between drumstick and thigh) with a clean knife or skewer until the juices run out. The juices shouldn't have any pink or red in them."

    This is bad advice. Color is a lousy indicator of doneness using a tip-sensitive digital thermometer is the only safe way to determine is food has reached a safe temperature.

    And just what is piping hot?

    "To test if food has been properly cooked, check that it is 'piping hot' all the way through. This means that it is hot enough for steam to come out. Cut open the food with a small knife so that you can check that it is piping hot in the middle. Generally, if food is piping hot in the middle, then it will be piping hot all the way through. … Some foods change colour when they are cooked. Looking at colour is especially useful for checking meat."

    I wonder how much money was spent on consultants, and how many salaries sat around a conference table, to conclude that consumers weren't bright enough to understand more accurate messages that would actually protect their well-being.

    Stick it in.


    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 5th, 2008 - 10:14pm by Doug Powell




    The author of La Gringa's Blogicito, whose motto is, Gardening and living in La Ceiba, Honduras; neither is easy for this American woman, writes the FDA Inspectors left Honduras on Friday with no word whatsoever as to the results of the tests at Agrolibano. According to La Prensa, the samples are being tested in the U.S. and the results will be given next week.



    She also says that little has been heard from the Honduran delegation who went to the U.S. last week to demand proof of the tests and a retraction from the FDA either. She does say that she's noticed more balanced reports from various agricultural and commercial experts saying that Honduras needs to vigilantly meet international quality and safety standards, but no admission that salmonella did exist in the melons.

    While searching for the news video, I ran a across a parody of that scene on YouTube. If you speak Spanish, you may get a kick out of the video below, "Mel Melon con Salmonella." Even if you don't, you may find it humorous.






    This is what we advise to safely prepare cantaloupe. And if you want to see just how emotional this issue is, check out the vulgar comments on our youtube video.



    Your rating: None
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 5th, 2008 - 9:10pm by Doug Powell

    Tellruide, Colorado, has a problem with poop.

    Dog poop.

    A local biologist, Ramona Gaylord, told city council that the impact of waste produced by 100 dogs located within a 20-mile radius of a watershed draining to a small coastal bay would contribute enough bacteria and nutrients to temporarily close it to swimming and shell fishing after two to three days, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    A new form from the Marshal’s Office is due to come into circulation soon. It will enable passersby to document occasions on which they witness owners neglecting their doodie duties. By signing the form the complainant agrees to be called as a witness if a ticket is issued and the matter goes to trial.

    So pick up your poop.

    And if you find some old poop, send it to University of Oregon archeologist Dennis Jenkins.

    Jenkins found 14 feces, or coprolites, in the Paisley caves in south-central Oregon. He reported in Science on Friday that the oldest piece of crap in the collection was 14,300 years old.

    Eske Willerslev, a Danish expert in ancient DNA and one of the authors of the paper, said genetic material found in the ancient poop suggests the earliest known North Americans came from Asia and Siberia, and were the ancestors of modern native peoples

    As they sing on Scrubs, Check the Poo.


    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 5th, 2008 - 9:59am by Doug Powell

    Health officials said more than 60 people fell ill after attending a medical convention, with several reporting symptoms as they prepared to leave on flights from Washington.

    Many of the victims came forward Friday, the day after attending the meeting Thursday at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in Oxon Hill, Md.

    Staff members of the Prince George's County health department interviewed resort workers and inspected the center to determine what caused the illness. A private company has already started cleaning.
    Your rating: None
    Norovirus  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 4th, 2008 - 10:58am by

    As many of you reading this blog may know, Rutgers University has sponsored a seminar series on the topic of raw milk.  I am scheduled to present the fourth and final talk in the series on Monday.  Today (April 3, 2008) I attended the third talk in the series: “Raw Milk, A Microbiology Primer” presented by Dr. Mark Gebhart, an MD with Wright State University.

    Dr. Gebhart is a licensed physician and board certified medical specialist practicing in Ohio.  Dr. Gebhart has worked in acute care medicine as a clinician, teacher, and researcher.  Dr. Gebhart has taken special interest in raw milk obtained from grass fed cows and believes many of the gastrointestinal disorders affecting millions of Americans could be cured by consumption of this product.  

    Gebhart spent the first half of his time pointing out in great detail that raw milk contains multiple redundant systems of bioactive components that reduce or eliminate pathogens.  He proceeded to show a series of slides listing more than twenty of these components (e.g. lactoperoxidase, medium chain fatty acids, B-lymphocytes, lysozyme, etc.).

    Gebhart’s focus then shifted to the microbial risks in raw milk.  He cited one study from a reputable journal (Applied and Environmental Microbiology) that showed that levels of the pathogens Campylobacter decline over time in raw milk.  When questioned by one audience member – Dr. Tom Montville – about CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) statistics showing many foodborne disease cases linked to raw milk, Gebhart said the he believed the epidemiological links to raw milk were not conclusively proven.

    Gebhart then shared some statistics from two different sources (American Journal of Public Health and the CDC) that show that there were only 1.9 cases of raw milk food poisoning per 100,000 people, vs. 4.7 cases of pasteurized milk food poisoning per people 100,000.  Gebhart thought that these data made a compelling point in favor of raw milk, until another audience member – Dr. Mukund Karwe – pointed out that many more people consume pasteurized milk than raw milk.  Gebhart then stated that he needed to double check his references.

    Gebhart then shared a number of slides in quick succession on a variety of topics including information on the effect of pasteurization on human breast milk, the safety of milk from cows with access to pasture, and the ability of some pathogens (spore formers like B. cereus and C. botulinum) to survive pasteurization.  Gebhart quickly wrapped up his talk as the debate between different audience members began to drown him out.

    I can’t wait to see how things go on Monday.
    --
    Don Schaffner is an Extension Specialist in Food Science at Rutgers
    University.
    Your rating: None
    Raw Food  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 4th, 2008 - 9:01am by Doug Powell

    The New Zealand Ministry of Health is working with local and national authorities to determine the cause of an outbreak of Salmonella mbandaka, a strain rarely seen in New Zealand.

    Nationally there have been 28 cases, 10 of which have occurred in the Nelson Marlborough district. A recent death occurred in an elderly woman in Nelson Hospital who had been infected with Salmonella mbandaka.

    The Ministry's Director of Public Health, Dr Mark Jacobs said,

    "… it's worth noting at this stage, no food premises have been implicated and all food samples tested have returned negative results."
    Your rating: None
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 3rd, 2008 - 7:40pm by Ben Chapman

    After posting this week's infosheet on a Brazilian soccer club's hep A outbreak possibly linked to dirty water bottles we picked up three more stories on hep A exposures:

    Cincinnati, OH:
    A food handler at a PF Chang's restaurant in West Chester, OH was diagnosed with hepatitis A earlier this week, and today there was a report of the vaccination clinic running out vaccine and sending exposed individuals to an urgent care facility as a back up (resulting in wait times upwards of three hours).

    Boise, ID:

    Nearly 300 people were vaccinated for hepatitis A at Boise's Central District Health this past week.
    The rush came after a health scare at the Red Feather Lounge where an employee confirmed infected with the virus

    New Zealand:

    An orchard worker was found  to have hepatitis A and was  sent home to the Solomon Islands.
    The fruitpicker, who was working at Apollo Pac in Whakatu for the season, was referred to the Hawke's Bay District Health Board's (DHB's) public health unit with the symptoms of Hepatitis A, including nausea and jaundice. The DHB's medical officer of health Caroline McElnay was cited as saying  23 people who had been living in close quarters with the person had also been screened for the disease and given an injection of antibodies for temporary protection.

    Happy hep A day.

    Your rating: None
    Hepatitis A  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 3rd, 2008 - 5:12pm by Doug Powell

    Two California girls aged 14 and 15 are in Juvenile Hall facing animal cruelty charges over allegedly microwaving a hamster.

    They also briefly put him a freezer.

    An investigating police officer said the girls have admitting microwaving Bugsy because they were bored.

    "These girls showed no remorse."

    The Press Democrat reports that the hamster, Bugsy, survived, but three of his feet were severely burned. Lake County Animal Control Officer Morgan Hermann said the legs later turned black and the hamster chewed them off, adding,

    “Now (Bugsy) has one leg."

    The incident occurred in December, but it was not reported to Animal Control and police until the students had been released for Spring break.

    Unlike the pic (right) this was not a happy hamster.
    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 3rd, 2008 - 8:34am by Ben Chapman

    Capitalizing on the massive popularity of soccer, we decided to throw together an infosheet on the reported hepatitis A illnesses linked to a Brazilian club team.  As Doug posted last night, health authorities are linking the outbreak to shared water bottles (they must have been contaminated with some nasty poop).

    You can download the infosheet here.



    Your rating: None
    Hepatitis A  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 2nd, 2008 - 6:54pm by Doug Powell

    The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control is urging anyone who purchased barbecue at a March 30 fundraiser for the Tega Cay Volunteer Fire Department to throw the food away.

    Firefighters sold approximately 3,000 servings of food and the York County Public Health Department has identified more than 40 people who became ill. Many people bought barbecue in bulk for freezing and later use.

    Tests are under way to identify the cause of the illness.
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 2nd, 2008 - 5:57pm by Doug Powell

    Associated Press is reporting that a hepatitis A outbreak hit the Brazilian soccer team Internacional, sidelining five players who are now banned from any contact with teammates.

    The team said the liver disease probably spread from player to player in the locker room, most likely through shared water bottles.

    Except hepatitis A is not spread by saliva; it's spread by poop. So there was either poop on the water bottles -- possibly from someone's hand -- or poop in the water.

    Or the water bottle theory is wrong.

    Internacional is a former club world champion.
    Your rating: None
    Hepatitis A  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 2nd, 2008 - 2:02pm by Doug Powell

    Last week,  Italy's Agriculture Minister, Paolo De Castro, (right) dug into some buffalo mozzarella for the cameras after assuring the European Commission that no mozzarella cheese contaminated with cancer-causing dioxin had been exported.

    On Saturday President Manuel Zelaya of Honduras downed some homegrown cantaloupe for a CNN news crew, proclaiming, "I eat this fruit without any fear. It’s a delicious fruit. Nothing happens to me!”

    Both were continuing a questionable tradition that may actually amplify the concerns of citizens when the safety of certain foods is scrutinized: roll out the politician to consume the food in question.
    The list is long:

    • Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien scarfed back a burger after the first case of mad cow disease was discovered in Canada in May 2003;
    • French President Jacques Chirac and future French president Nicolas Sarkozy consumed cooked chicken during the International Agriculture show in Paris in March 2006 to bolster confidence after an outbreak of avain influenza;
    • Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg said in 2006 he often fed salmon to his own children after Russia banned imports of fresh Norwegian salmon because of worries about toxic metals;
    • Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell lunched at a Philadelphia Taco Bell in Dec. 2006 after an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak linked to lettuce sickened 71; and,
    • most famously, former U.K. Agriculture Minister John Gummer feeding a hamburger to his four-year-old daughter Cordelia as concerns about the safety of British beef mounted in 1990 (left).

    Do people believe politicians? How about company executives?

    In 2000, 14,700 Japanese were sickened and 180 hospitalized after Snow Brand milk employees failed to properly clean factory pipes for weeks. As reported in The Economist, "At one point during Snow Brand’s latest poisoning scare, its befuddled boss fled a press conference shouting, 'I haven’t slept at all in the past week.'"

    Snow Brand has a bit of a reputation for dramatics.

    "When, almost half a century ago, some 1,900 school children fell ill after drinking Snow Brand’s powdered milk, a dismissive company executive confidently downed a glass of the drink in front of the press to allay fears of contamination. A few hours later, as expected, he was rushed to a bathroom."

    Several years ago, Health Canada proposed to ban the sale of cheeses derived from raw milk, but they failed to provide a compelling case for such a ban. They also ignored the cultural and social factors—the enjoyment—that lead some people to rank specific cheeses like fine wines. Raw milk cheeses can contain the bacterium Listeria which can cause life-threatening illness and lead to miscarriages, but such cases simply had not been seen in Canada (which does not mean such cases did not exist). This left health officials arguing that such cheeses should be banned, even in the absence of Canadian-based scientific evidence to warrant such a ban. The Minister of Health at the time, David Dingwall, was soon in Quebec, scarfing down raw milk cheese for the television cameras.

    People make risk/benefit decisions every time they enter an automobile, smoke a cigarette, have a drink, eat fat or enter into a relationship. Rather than eating up in front of the camera, governments, executives, even local farmers, should provide data to back up their claims of safety.

    Douglas Powell is scientific director of the International Food Safety Network at Kansas State University.
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: April 1st, 2008 - 6:26pm by Doug Powell

    On June 12, 1996, Ontario, Canada's chief medical officer, Dr. Richard Schabas, issued a public health advisory on the presumed link between consumption of California strawberries and an outbreak of diarrheal illness among some 40 people in the Metro Toronto area. The announcement followed a similar statement from the Department of Health and Human Services in Houston, Texas, which was investigating a cluster of 18 cases of cyclospora illness among oil executives.

    Turns out it was Guatemalan raspberries, and no one was happy.

    Last month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency warned consumers to stay away from Honduran cantaloupes because of a salmonella outbreak that has sickened at least 50 Americans and nine Canadians.

    The president of Honduras is furious. So is the agriculture minister who is demanding millions in reparations, saying the U.S. has not scientifically proven the fruit was infected in Honduras.

    But proof is rare.

    The initial, and subsequent, links between cyclospora and strawberries or raspberries in 1996 was based on epidemiology, a statistical association between consumption of a particular food and the onset of disease. The Toronto outbreak was first identified because some 35 guests attending a May 11, 1996 wedding reception developed the same severe, intestinal illness, seven to 10 days after the wedding, and subsequently tested positive for cyclospora. Based on interviews with those stricken, health authorities in Toronto and Texas concluded that California strawberries were the most likely source. However, attempts to remember exactly what one ate two weeks earlier is an extremely difficult task; and larger foods, like strawberries, are recalled more frequently than smaller foods, like raspberries.

    By July 18, 1996, the CDC declared that raspberries from Guatemala -- which had been sprayed with pesticides mixed with water that could have been contaminated with human sewage containing cyclospora -- were the likely source of the cyclospora outbreak, which ultimately sickened about 1,000 people across North America. Guatemalan health authorities and producers vigorously refuted the charges. The California Strawberry Commission estimated it lost $15 million to $20 million in reduced strawberry sales.

    Once epidemiology identifies a probable link between a food and some dangerous bug, health officials have to decide whether it makes sense to warn the public. In retrospect, the decision seems straightforward, but there are several possibilities that must be weighed at the time.

    Back in 1996, when the Ontario Ministry of Health decided to warn people that eating imported strawberries might be connected to cyclospora infection, two outcomes were possible: if it turned out that strawberries were implicated, the ministry made a smart decision, warning people against something that could hurt them; if strawberries were not implicated, then the ministry made a bad decision with the result that strawberry growers and sellers lost money and people stopped eating something that was good for them.

    If the ministry decided not to warn people, another two outcomes were possible: if strawberries were implicated, then the ministry made a bad decision and people could have acquired a parasitic infection they could have avoided had they been given the information (lawsuits usually follow); if strawberries were definitely not implicated then nothing happens, the industry does not suffer and the ministry does not get in trouble for not telling people.

    These scenarios apply to cantaloupes and salmonella, raw milk and E. coli, and any other combination of food and pathogen.

    It's often not fair. Any hosehead can come along and say, "Hey, I found a mouse in my beer bottle, give me a free case of beer." Or a syringe in some soda. Or I barfed from eating some food. The best producers or manufacturers can do is diligently manage and mitigate risks and be able to prove such diligence in the court of public opinion.

    Douglas Powell is scientific director of the International Food Safety Network at Kansas State University. A video on preparing cantaloupe -- and some nasty comments which highlight the trade and economic issues at stake -- is available here .
    Your rating: None
    Salmonella  |  Comments