February 2008

  • Posted: February 21st, 2008 - 10:23pm by Doug Powell

    Last week it was a Wegman's supermarket in New York. Last year it was Beyonce at a Wolfgang Puck catered Sports Illustrated party. This time, it's Ashton Kutcher's 30th birthday party on Feb. 7 where A-list celebrities such as Demi Moore, Madonna, Ivanka Trump, Salma Hayek, Gwyneth Paltrow, Kate Hudson, Bruce Willis, Lucy Liu, Roberto Cavalli and Liv Tyler, who all attended, are now being asked to get immunoglobin shots to ward off hepatitis A.

    Apparently a bartender at Socialista, some fancy club where the birthday bash was held, was discovered to be carrying hepatitis A earlier this week, and when city health department officials inspected the bar they discovered that it lacked hand-washing soap.

    One story gave a new twist to the oral-fecal route description we usually use:

    According to the health department, hepatitis A is a relatively rare disease spread by putting something in one's mouth that has been contaminated with traces of fecal matter.

    Don't eat poop.

    The day manager who answered the phone at Socialista this afternoon told the Health Blog that the bartender apparently got hepatitis on a recent vacation to Honduras, and just found out he had the bug.

    These hepatitis A cases are a weekly occurrence in the U.S. A food worker (bartender) parties in Mexico or the Dominican or in this case, Honduras, where hepatitis A is endemic. Food worker (bartender) comes home, is fine for two weeks, then spends the next two weeks crapping out virus. And unless food worker  (bartender) is really diligent about handwashing, he's spreading virus-containing poop on food -- especially fresh produce or salads. And it's really hard to effectively wash hands without soap. After four weeks, food worker turns yellow and goes to the doctor where a diagnosis is made. Then the clinics start.

    Get vaccinated for hepatitis A. And dude, wash your damn hands.






    Your rating: None
    Hepatitis A  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 21st, 2008 - 8:35pm by Doug Powell

    Maybe I'm missing some privacy thing, but an individual with a small video camera initiated the largest meat recall in U.S. history.

    So why isn't the U.S. Department of Agriculture making use of the same technology?

    Public watering holes are jumping on the bandwagon.

    The New York Times reports that bar Webcams are a growing phenomenon in cities like Boston, Denver, Chicago, San Diego, Minneapolis, and even tourist spots like Key West.

    The idea is: with a Webcam installed in a bar or restaurant, potential customers can call up the live video stream online or by mobile phone so they can survey the crowd before venturing out.

    People who want a quiet night can scout for a bar with a mellow scene, and those who want a lively night can look for the crowds. (Webcam bar promoters say it's typically a 50-50 split between the two camps.)

    For the promoters, the online traffic equals money. Relatively new services like Barmigo and Barseenlive sell flat-rate subscriptions to the bars for licensing the Webcams and promoting their sites, and other upstarts like Baroptic.com are seeking to sell advertisements to liquor companies like Coors and Bacardi to run against those video streams.


    Your rating: None
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 21st, 2008 - 10:00am by Doug Powell

    Brian Curtis, a retired senior Food Standards Agency official, who now works as a freelance food safety consultant, told a public inquiry that the use of a single vacuum packing machine for both raw and cooked meat at E. coli butcher William Tudor’s factory was “like playing Russian Roulette." adding,

    "It seems to me, in a crude analysis, it is a bit like playing Russian Roulette. You might get away with it the first time, the second time, the third time, but progressively you have a greater chance the gun will go off and what we are talking about is a nine-month period."

    The South Wales Echo also reports that Mr Curtis told the inquiry yesterday that a document produced by Tudor -- his HACCP plan --  "was not a valid plan. It was not a safe plan,"  but that Bridgend council’s environmental health officers, “failed to identify the deficiencies and weaknesses” of the document.

    Mr Curtis also said there had been flaws in the way Tudor’s was inspected because there were too many announced visits that allowed him to prepare and that the inspections themselves had not been undertaken thoroughly, stating,

    "There was a failure in the series of inspections to identify poor hygiene and working practices and a failure to take action."
    Your rating: None
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 21st, 2008 - 8:15am by Doug Powell

    The Irish Hospital Consultants Association plans to protest to the HSE about its current advertising campaign asking patients to ask health professionals whether they have washed their hands.

    Irish Health reports that the campaign has met with a mixed reaction from the public, judging by the latest irishhealth.com viewers' poll results. One viewer says she has even complained to the Broadcasting Complaints Commission about the advertising campaign. (To view the full results and comments click on...http://www.irishhealth.com/poll.html?pollid=423 )

    HSE Assistant National Director for Health Protection Dr Kevin Kelleher said evidence shows that hand hygiene is the single most effective defence against the spread of MRSA.

    Donal Duffy, Assistant Secretary General of the IHCA, told irishhealth.com,

    "They (consultants) find it gratuitously insulting, given that the campaign effectively accuses consultants of not washing their hands."

    Janette Byrne of the Patients Together organization, said,

    "If you are feeling very sick it would be difficult to have the worry of asking staff about their hand hygiene. We  feel that the full responsibility for this should be placed on hospital staff, and it is not fair to put this burden on the patient. … Many people would struggle to confront a doctor or nurse on this issue and we feel the campaign is very much a case of the HSE passing the buck."
    Your rating: None
    Handwashing  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 21st, 2008 - 7:37am by Doug Powell

    Bill Marler and 35 of his food safety colleagues will be speaking at a packed day-and-a-half Seminar in Seattle, April 11-12, 2008.

    From the brochure:

    Seattle was the epicenter of the Jack in the Box E. coli outbreak that sickened 600 and killed four 15 years ago. In addition to explaining how our present system works, this program is intended to discuss how changing consumer preferences are affecting the development and distribution of food, examine whether federal, state and industry oversight roles are changing, and discuss how the regulatory and judicial processes can be most efficiently balanced.

    Full conference and registration information is available at http://www.marlerblog.com/Who's%20Minding%20the%20Store.pdf.
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 20th, 2008 - 8:56pm by Doug Powell

    The Kansas Department of Agriculture is warning consumers in the Garden City area not to eat soft white cheese sold in unmarked packages because it came from an unapproved source and may be contaminated with Salmonella.

    Food safety inspectors found the cheese being sold last week at Panaderia Real, 107 North Jennie Barker Road, in Garden City.  The cheese was destroyed after testing confirmed that it was made from unpasteurized milk and that it was contaminated with Salmonella.

    An investigation into the cheese’s origin revealed that it was being made in the home of Guadalupe Valadez, who is not licensed to manufacture food. To be licensed, Valadez would need to use a commercial kitchen to make the cheese and to undergo routine food safety inspections.

    Valadez was selling the cheese to neighbors, to coworkers at Tyson Foods and to two stores, Panaderia Real on Jennie Barker Road and at Panaderia Alexis at 146 Stevens Avenue.  She reports she had been making and selling the cheese for about a month.

    The illegal cheese was identified during a two-month pilot project to monitor the safety of imported and domestically produced foods offered for sale in Kansas.  It was launched by the Kansas Department of Agriculture late last month.  '

    Inspectors are collecting up to 10 products from each facility they visit as part of the project.  Products are tested for Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli, the most common causes of foodborne illness.


    Your rating: None
    Raw Food, Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 20th, 2008 - 7:10pm by Doug Powell

    The Indonesian Health Minister has claimed the U.S. is using bird flu samples to produce biological weapons.

    The United States has rejected the claims.

    The Sydney Morning Herald reports that Indonesian President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, is understood to have ordered the minister, Siti Fadilah Supari, to recall copies of her book on avian influenza, which alleges the US and the WHO are conspiring against developing countries by seizing control of bird flu samples.

    A U.S. State Department spokeswoman, Susan Stahl, denied Dr Supari's claim that Indonesian virus samples had been sent to a biological weapons laboratory in Los Alamos. The laboratory possessed no bird flu viruses from Indonesia or elsewhere.

    Dr Supari yesterday continued to say virus samples had been sent via the WHO to the laboratory in Los Alamos, adding,

    "Whether they use it to make vaccine or develop chemical weapons would depend on the need and interest of the US Government. It is indeed a very dangerous situation for the destiny of humanity."

    The WHO's assistant director-general for Health Security, David Heymann,said he was puzzled by the claims, adding,

    "I don't understand why they would take this virus to make a biological weapon; it doesn't transmit from human to human. Indonesia needs to spend more time on dealing with infections with chickens and stopping humans from being infected."
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 20th, 2008 - 4:48pm by Doug Powell

    Chinese-language media was cited as reporting yesterday that a diner was seriously upset when he saw a rat scurrying about one of Taipei 101's stylish Japanese restaurants.

    The man, surnamed Chai, was cited as saying that he and his foreign guest hadn't finished dinning yet on Feb. 2, when a small rat scrambled quickly from the shopping mall into Minhan 101, and then towards the kitchen, adding,

    "That was disgusting. The Taipei 101 is a national landmark visited by numerous foreigners."

    Wang Yen-chi, spokesperson for Taipei 101, said that rat-eradication campaigns on the fourth floor will be increased, up from two disinfections per moths.
    Your rating: None
  • Posted: February 20th, 2008 - 11:08am by Ben Chapman

    Doug posted the initial story about this eatery last week.  The Toronto Star is reporting today that the "Rat-plagued" Dumpling House at 328 Spadina Ave. is now open again.

    The Star reports that the restaurant was closed over the long weekend and management was told it would have to comply with health regulations, including disinfecting the premises and contacting a pest-control operator.

    Michael Chu, the manager of the Dumpling House was cited as saying he wanted to deal with the vermin problem, adding,"If the city didn't shut us down, I would have closed." 

    The staff reportedly spent the weekend "bleaching" tables, counters, containers and utensils. Chu hired a pest control operator to set traps.
    The best part (and not really surprising) of the story to me is this:

    While the incident will cost Chu around $10,000 in cleanup and closing costs, he says he's not concerned. Even with a sign outside alerting people to the infestation, he had to turn people away. "I have gotten calls of support all day. It's touching. I just want to cry."

    Wonder how much of an effect posting restaurant grades/advisories really has on consumer preferences (especially if it is your favourite spot).

    Your rating: None
  • Posted: February 19th, 2008 - 8:57pm by Doug Powell

    I spend several hours each day editing news, writing, tapping away at the computer. I do most of this on my living room couch, usually with some sort of TV on in the background. Earlier today, there was a semi-decent movie on, which then went straight into 1985's Commando, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. I glanced up now and then, just cause it was so terrible.

    Today, Commando, now California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, said in a letter to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer,

    "We urge swift investigation and action so that the public confidence in our food supply is not lost and a message is sent that mistreatment of animals will not be tolerated by anyone. … (The case) represents one of the worst violations of food safety laws in the country and one of the most egregious cases of animal cruelty I've ever seen. Because the State of California has no jurisdiction in this matter, my administration stands ready to assist the U.S. Department of Agriculture in this investigation in any way possible. … If these allegations are proven to be true and an isolated case, we expect full criminal prosecution. If this is a willful and broad-based corporate practice, we urge you to shut the plant down and pursue full prosecution of those involved."

    Animal welfare shouldn't be a downer.
    Your rating: None
  • Posted: February 19th, 2008 - 7:31pm by Doug Powell

    The undercover investigator behind the biggest beef recall in U.S. history -- who will admit he is a vegan -- told the Los Angeles Times in a telephone interview Monday, that his six weeks at a Chino slaughterhouse that supplied meat to school lunch programs and supermarkets throughout the U.S. provided an abundance of evidence of abuse.

    "It was so blatant, so commonplace. It was so in-your-face . . . they were pushing animals we felt never should have qualified for human consumption."

    The investigator said most of the animals slaughtered at Hallmark/Westland were former dairy cattle -- many, he added, already weak and emaciated when they were trucked in.

    On his first day, a cow collapsed on its way to the slaughter box, and two workers immediately jumped into the chute. One grabbed the cow by its tail and the other shocked it with electrical prods. When that failed, workers killed the cow on the spot, hooked a chain around the animal's neck and dragged it all the way into the slaughter box on its knees.

    The undercover said he saw weaker animals being prodded upright, or having water shot into their nostrils before shakily walking to slaughter. Some downer cows were hauled with chains. He said a supervisor would order his men to "get them up! Get them up!" when cows seemed too sick to walk.
    Your rating: None
  • Posted: February 18th, 2008 - 11:14pm by Doug Powell

    As part of our L.A. getaway, Amy and I spent Sunday walking in the Sunset Beach area, soaking up some sun and eventually stopped by an ocean-view café for a drink.

    The Sunday brunch crowd was coming and going, and two separate groups of people brought their dogs onto the patio. I asked our server about doggy dining in Orange County and she said she didn't know but that the health inspectors didn't complain and the servers had doggy biscuits for polite pooches. But she also volunteered that if it's crowded, or the dog appears aggressive, she has no problem telling the owner to tie the dog up on the outside of the patio. Sounds good to us.

    In other regions, the Tennessee Senate State and Local Government Committee is set to vote Tuesday on a bill that would allow cities with a population of more than 100,000 -- no idea why the population limit -- can enact local ordinances to permit doggy dining under certain circumstances.

    A restaurant would have to apply for a local permit to let a "companion dog" on its premises, but only in outdoor seating areas.

    The bill would also require:

    • accidents involving companion dog waste shall be cleaned immediately;
    • a kit with the appropriate materials for such (cleaning) use shall be kept near the designated outdoor area" where dogs are permitted;
    • all public food service establishment employees shall wash their hands promptly after touching, petting or otherwise handling a companion dog; and,
    • companion dogs shall not be allowed on chairs, tables or other furnishings.

    Meanwhile, the Jacksonville, Florida, City Council held a public hearing last week on whether dogs should be allowed at restaurants with outdoor seating.

    Jim Provoncios, who supports dogs dining at area restaurant, said,

    "I do think that's OK, as long as there's a provision like a water bowl or keeping dogs close to their owners, and as long as they can't walk around."


    An opponent of the proposal was quoted as telling the meeting,

    "You've passed laws that say you don’t want to tolerate smoke when you're eating in a restaurant, but I don’t want a dog to poop on my shoe while I'm eating, either. I don’t want to encounter fleas while eating."

    Another man was quoted as saying,

    "I think it's fine. As long as the dogs leave 15 percent, then it's fine."
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 18th, 2008 - 8:19pm by Doug Powell

    A food safety inspector who visited John Tudor & Son five times in 2005 told the E. coli inquiry in Wales today that although a single vac-pac machine was being used for cooked and raw meat, the business did not pose "an imminent risk" to human health.

    Media Wales reported that Angela Coles, a Bridgend Council environmental health officer said she took on "face value" explanations from the company's manager Celyn Williams about training and how the vacuum-packaging machine would be cleaned between being used for cooked and raw meats.

    James Eadie, the inquiry's lead counsel, also questioned Amy Lewis, a senior environmental health officer at Bridgend Council, about holding temperatures after cooking gammon, which exceeded Tudor's own HACCP plan, stating,

    "Is it inconceivable that you would have asked about temperatures, found out it was non-compliant with a crucial step in the HACCP plan and then made no record or note of it? You didn't pick this up?"

    Ms Lewis replied, "I don't recall."

    The inquiry also heard that E. coli butcher William Tudor was granted his first butcher's licence despite not possessing a relevant food safety certificate; instead he passed a 26-question test, set by senior Bridgend Council environmental health officers in 2001.
    Your rating: None
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 17th, 2008 - 9:58pm by Doug Powell

    In 1184, city leaders in Toulouse, France, introduced some of the first documented measures to oversee the sale of meat: profit for butchers was limited to eight per cent; the partnership between two butchers was forbidden; and, selling the meat of sick animals was forbidden unless the buyer was warned.

    By 1394, the Toulouse charter on butchering contained 60 articles, 19 of which were devoted to health and safety.

    As outlined by Madeleine Ferrières, a professor of social history at the University of Avignon, in her 2002 book, Sacred Cow, Mad Cow: A History of Food Fears, the goal of regulations at butcher shops -- the forerunners of today's slaughterhouse -- was to safeguard consumers and increase tax revenues. Animals from the surrounding countryside were consolidated at a single spot -- the evolving slaughterhouse, originally inside city walls -- so taxes could be more easily gathered, and so animals could be physically examined for signs of disease.

    It's no different today: slaughterhouses are common collection points to examine animals for signs of disease and to collect various levies. And like medieval times, one of the most basic rules is animals that cannot walk are forbidden from entering (the slaughterhouse or city).

    So when Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Co., a Chino, Calif., establishment that is (was) the second-largest provider of beef to the U.S. school lunch program was caught breaking the rules, the U.S. Department of Agriculture on Sunday announced the firm was voluntarily recalling two-years worth of production, or approximately 143 million pounds of raw and frozen beef products. USDA had determined the meat to be unfit for human food because the cattle did not receive complete and proper inspection.

    But it wasn't the inspectors and veterinarians who work for USDA, those who are paid to be present in the slaughterhouse to inspect and verify compliance, who busted the case. It was an undercover employee of the Humane Society of the United States who obtained footage which prompted USDA to act (the original video is available at:
    https://community.hsus.org/campaign/CA_2008_investigation?qp_source=gaba89).

    The slaughterhouse was found using a variety of distasteful techniques such as electric prods, nudging with a forklift and waterboarding, to get non-ambulatory animals to walk one last time, and just in time for the USDA-type to notice.

    A non-ambulatory animal is also called a downer.

    Federal regulations forbid downed cattle from entering the food supply because they may have higher levels of E. coli, salmonella or mad cow disease.

    A 2004 review of meat inspection in Canada found that cattle become non-ambulatory at all ages and for a variety of reasons, and that banning these animals from the food chain could encourage illegal slaughter and the sale of uninspected meat processed under unhygienic conditions.

    "However," the report stated, "most downer animals are dairy cows that are at the end of their productive lives and are being sent for slaughter to salvage what little value remains. The quality of their meat is low and although it cannot be said that this meat is unsafe, there is a heightened risk."
    That's why they're supposed to be kept out of the food supply.

    In the Middle Ages, violation of regulations ranged from fines to flogging to banishment.
    Hallmark/Westland Meat Packing Co. will be flogged in the media and the two-year recall should effectively banish the company.

    But unlike 12th century France, USDA has access to the same video technology that a single undercover worker was able to use to bring down a large corporation. Producers and processors who say their food is safe should be able to prove it. Producers and processors who say they treat animals humanely should be able to prove it.
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 17th, 2008 - 9:48pm by Doug Powell

    Napa’s new Whole Foods received an F grade in its first county food facility inspection.

    Store manager David Cosper said the market’s sheer size and diversity of offerings may have contributed towards the failing grade, which Whole Foods took steps to fix “immediately."

    The major violations included improper handwashing and use of gloves at a hot counter area, improper hot and cold holding temperatures in several food areas and lack of availability of hot or cold water at two sinks. Other violations included improper handling of food and food storage, uncovered containers and missing sneeze guards.

    In Virginia, the Daily Press reports that Ford's Colony, a popular gated community in James City County complete with a 200-acre wildlife preserve, a wine cellar with 1,600 labels and three 18-hole golf courses, has also, on occasion, been home to poorly dated food, meat kept at improper temperatures and employees who were caught not washing their hands.

    Ford's Colony is hardly the only private club with health violations in Hampton Roads. Country clubs, yacht clubs and golf clubs with exclusive memberships from James City to Suffolk have all recently received critical marks that belie the air of posh living these communities pride themselves on.

    It's like Ben and I discovered during the halfway point of a food safety golf tournament in Baltimore in 2005, when a burley, 50-ish goateed he-man requested his hamburger be cooked, "Bloody … with cheese."

    His sidekick piped up, "Me too."

    I asked the kid flipping burgers if he had a meat thermometer.

    He replied, snickering, "Yeah, this is a pretty high-tech operation."

    The young woman taking orders glanced about, and then confided that she didn't think there was a meat thermometer anywhere in the kitchen; this, at a fancy golf course catering to weddings and other swanky functions along with grunts on the golf course.
    Your rating: None
  • Posted: February 17th, 2008 - 5:42pm by Amy Hubbell

    Doug and I are in L.A. for a few days and I’ve appreciated the prominent handwashing signs in public and private lavatories. This one comes from the outdoor Public Restroom off the beach at the famous Gladstone’s of Malibu seafood restaurant. I read the sign when I walked into the bathroom, but when I tried to wash my hands, the water came out of the faucet in a tiny trickle. The water pressure in their indoor/private facility was slightly better but still conservative. It’s impressive to have signage that indicates all the different times when one should wash her hands, but if the facilities are lacking, there isn’t much point.

    The second sign, found today at a beach café in Long Beach, CA was also interesting because the Spanish appears larger than the English part. I also like the idea that I’m breaking state law if I do not wash my damn hands before returning to work.





    Your rating: None
    Handwashing  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 17th, 2008 - 12:11pm by Doug Powell

    The National Post reported Friday that Toronto public health authorities shut down one of Chinatown’s most prominent restaurants after a passerby took a photo of rats on a countertop.

    Passerby Vivian Hui said rats were visible through a window of the Dumpling House Restaurant yesterday afternoon, adding,

    "I noticed what I thought was a cat on the counter inside Dumpling House but it turned out to be four or five rats piled on top of each other eating from a bowl of flour or something."

    She e-mailed her boyfriend, Matt Alexander, who alerted health authorities. He also sent the photo to blogto.com, a popular Toronto city blog.

    Toronto Public Health said inspectors went to the restaurant immediately, saw evidence of an infestation, and shut the restaurant down.

    A manager who answered the phone at the restaurant said they agreed with health inspectors that the restaurant needed to be shut down, adding,

    "I fully agree. If there’s a problem, some indication, we have to take it seriously. We have pest control guys working on the case right now. … ‘We have a very good reputation.  That’s why we are taking this very seriously. I think [this shutdown] may affect business for a very short time, but not very much because our cleaning conditions are good."

    The manager said he had never seen rats himself in the restaurant, and said any rat problem is not confined to Dumpling House. He said downtown has a rat problem generally, and the city needs to do something about it. Same as New York.
    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 17th, 2008 - 12:06pm by Doug Powell

    The Tasmanian Director of Public Health, Dr Roscoe Taylor, said consumers should be aware that eggs are a safe and excellent source of nutrition when handled and prepared correctly but in recent years there had been several outbreaks of Salmonella gastroenteritis linked to the consumption of raw or undercooked egg products, including the most recent outbreak in the Hobart area.

    "All the evidence we have collected so far indicates that there is no single ‘magic bullet’ solution to preventing further outbreaks of salmonella gastroenteritis. Things can go wrong at each step of the way from farm to fork, and so multiple control points and strategies are required – in just the same way as we recommend that drinking water authorities use a 'catchment-to-tap' approach to drinking water management.

    The Public and Environmental Health Service has previously issued several warnings to both the food industry and the public outlining the hazards associated with raw egg products and cautioning against their continued use. …  I say this because OzFoodNet - the Australian national surveillance system for foodborne diseases has reported that the number of egg-related Salmonella outbreaks across Australia increased in 2006 and 2007 when compared to previous years. Eggs were responsible for approximately 14% of the 115 foodborne disease outbreaks occurring in 2006 and 12% of the138 outbreaks in 2007.”


    Dr Taylor said that given the national increase, and the local experience of salmonella outbreaks associated with eggs, we propose to introduce new measures to control the safety of raw egg products in Tasmania as a matter of urgency. 

    Under the new requirements all food businesses choosing to make raw egg products must document the method of manufacture and follow strict and auditable procedures governing egg receipt, product preparation, storage and handling.

    The shelf life of each batch of raw egg product will also be limited to no more than 24 hours under refrigeration, after which the product must be discarded.

    Dr Taylor said the new egg safety measures will be legally enforceable by local government environmental health officers, as part food business licensing and inspection procedures.

    “The new requirements will not apply to businesses using commercially processed egg-based sauces and dressings, or to businesses that use pasteurised products such as egg pulp in lieu of raw eggs.

     “I would also urge patrons when dining out to ask whether raw eggs have been used to prepare mayonnaise, aioli and tartare sauces, so that they can make an informed choice."

    Your rating: None
    Raw Food, Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 17th, 2008 - 1:03am by Doug Powell

    A public inquiry heard Friday about a string of failures by food safety officers responsible for inspections of William Tudor’s meat plant leading up to the September, 2005 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak.

    The South Wales Echo reported that Amy Lewis, an environmental health officer, admitted failing to check Tudor’s claims that his staff had food hygiene certificates – but only after a series of questions by lead counsel to the inquiry James Eadie, including the evidence that Tudor himself had admitted the staff were never trained.

    A second officer, Ian Sullivan, who was responsible for advising on a critical food handling plan had only been employed for a few months when he became responsible for supervising Tudor and had never dealt with a business of that size.

    A third officer, Joanne Evans, admitted mistakes in filling out forms that affected how often the Bridgend Industrial Estate plant was inspected.

    Earlier in the week
    , Tudor said in a letter read out at the Cardiff inquiry, he followed official hazard analysis guidelines, and the practices used by his firm were supervised by Bridgend Council.

    It was also revealed that Tudor, who was sentenced to 12 months in jail for his actions, was released after serving on 12 weeks.

    The parents of five-year-old Mason Jones (right), who died during the outbreak, were unaware of Tudor’s early release until the start of this week’s public inquiry and called it a “travesty of justice.”

    Garyn Price, 12, who almost died after contracting E.coli during the outbreak, was quoted as saying he was “disgusted” Tudor was allowed out of prison so soon and said,

    “I got upset when my mum told me he was out. They should’ve kept him in prison longer. I don’t think he will have learned his lesson.”

    There were 157 probable cases of the E.coli O157 strain and 118 confirmed during the outbreak, which was declared on 16 September 2005 and declared over on 20 December that year.

    It affected 44 schools across south Wales, making it the largest outbreak of its kind in Wales, and the second biggest in the UK.
    Your rating: None
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: February 16th, 2008 - 11:52am by Doug Powell

    The National Post reports that Susanna Chen and her common-law husband, Andy Valy of Toronto who nearly died from botulism after drinking tainted carrot juice in Sept. 2006, are launching a lawsuit against the California company that manufactures the beverage

    Mr. Valy and Ms. Chen both fell into comas. It was weeks before Toronto Public Health realized the couple had been poisoned with botulism and issued a recall. Bolthouse Farm maintains that the tainted juice had not been properly refrigerated.

    Michael Shannon, a lawyer representing the couple, said,

    "They refrigerated the product, they just drank a toxic cocktail that they weren’t aware of.” 

    Mr. Shannon refused to disclose the amount the couple is suing for, except to say they will be launching a suit in the United States for pain and suffering.

    The story says that Bolthouse Farms did not immediately return calls. The juice was ordered off North American store shelves toward the end of September, 2006, after four cases of botulism in the United States were linked to the toxic carrot juice. In October, a Quebec resident was also stricken with botulism after drinking carrot juice.

     
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments