June 2007

  • Posted: June 29th, 2007 - 6:00am by Doug Powell

    The Vancouver Coastal Health Authority reports that 18 participants or spectators at the Test of Metal mountain bike race June 16 have confirmed cases of campylobacter.

    Within days of the race, online mountain bike forums like NSMB.com began buzzing with participants reporting symptoms of campylobacter infection,

    Cliff Miller, the event organizer for the past 14 years, was cited as saying this is the first time anything like this has happened, and that this year's wet and rainy race day conditions were the worst he's seen, adding, "I think everybody had fun until they got home."

    One potential source of the campylobacter was mud mixed with animal waste. Another was ground water.
    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 28th, 2007 - 8:32pm by Doug Powell

    Robert's American Gourmet has been notified by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of 51 cases of Salmonella across 17 states, associated or related to the consumption of the Veggie Booty, predominately in children of three years of age or younger. Based on the information provided by the CDC and FDA Robert's American Gourmet has decided to conduct this recall as a precautionary measure, even though there are no confirmed positive results in the finished product yet.

    Veggie Booty is a delicious snack that you and your family will love, made from the finest ingredients, and contains a blend of spinach, kale, cabbage, carrots and broccoli. The company says, " This is a life-changing snack that will help you eat healthier."

    Others say, "Veggie Booty is basically crack for babies. Which is exactly why parents buy it. … It smells funkier than poop, has questionable nutritional value and leaves a trail of bright green powder in its wake."

    And in 2002, the Good Housekeeping Institute suggested the Booty was junk food in disguise.
    Your rating: None
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 28th, 2007 - 2:08pm by Amy Hubbell



    Last night on Bravo’s Top Chef, Micah got eliminated for her bad-tasting but healthy meatloaf. Last week, Micah caught my attention as she used a meat thermometer in the barbeque elimination challenge. She came in the top three for her perfectly grilled lamb chops.

    This is the same show that has had openly sick (or at least nauseated) chefs cooking anyway because they didn’t want to be kicked out of the competition (they wouldn't get work in Michigan, where the state has proposed that someone with vomiting, diarrhea or a sore throat with fever could not return until 24 hours after the symptoms are gone).

    And last night when the oven wasn’t working and Cheftestant Sara M’s chicken didn’t get done, she handpicked and served the pieces that looked cooked… no meat thermometer in sight, at least to the viewers.

    Although Micah’s gone now, hats off to her.  Often depressed and crying, missing her daughter, Micah still had the presence of mind to stick in the meat thermometer to check the internal temperature of her barbecued meat. Whether she did it for accuracy or safety, Micah’s choice to use a thermometer stood out. How often do you see one on a TV cooking show? Perhaps the climate on the reality cooking circuit will change.

    In 2004, Doug's laboratory reported that, based on 60 hours of detailed viewing of television cooking shows, an unsafe food handling practice occurred about every four minutes, and that for every safe food handling practice observed, they observed 13 unsafe practices. The most common errors were inadequate hand washing and cross-contamination between raw and ready-to-eat foods.

    Hey, reality cooking show producers: serve up another helping of food safety.

    Your rating: None
    Thermometers  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 27th, 2007 - 12:32pm by Brae Surgeoner

    According to a new study appearing in the June issue of the Journal of Environmental Health, important barriers related to hand-washing in the restaurant environment include time pressure, inadequate facilities and supplies, lack of accountability, lack of involvement of managers and coworkers, and organizations that are not supportive of hand-washing - ouch!
    The researchers used two focus groups (a total of 18 participants, although recruitment calls were made to 150 establishments) to interview food handlers currently employed in restaurants in two Oregon counties.
    The advantage of using focus groups is to derive substantive content of verbally expressed views, opinions, experiences and attitudes that are not as easily accessed using means such as surveys. For instance, a food handler in the current study who expressed a desire for additional education and training about FBI's that result from not washing hands during food preparation, was quoted as saying: "I am very curious. I know germs exist and they are out there. We hear about Salmonella and all that stuff. But I'm curious as to if we don't wash our hands, what is the result? I think we should be educated because I don't really know what happens. I mean yeah, you get sick. But what does Salmonella do to a person?" But, after having worked in the foodservice industry for several years prior to joining iFSN, one of my favorite quotes from the study regarding lack of accountability for hand-washing (because I don’t doubt that it's a common fear in the industry) has to be: "I don't think I could tell anyone I work with that they need to wash their hands. I'd get some swear words back in my face."
    As a result of the focus group sessions, the researchers recommended that future educational and training programs include: a hands on training program that orients new employees to correct hand-washing practices and more advanced education about FBI's; involvement of both managers and coworkers in the training; easily accessible hand-washing facilities stocked with necessary supplies; continued hand-washing training and support involving the food service industry, managers, and coworkers; and finally, involvement of health departments and inspectors in providing managers and food workers with advice and consultation on improvement of hand-washing practice.
    For more pictures of hand-washing signs and miscellaneous food safety related notices that we've captured in our travels, check out our blog, Hygiene Aficionado.
    Your rating: None
    Handwashing  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 21st, 2007 - 8:55pm by Doug Powell

    The Associated Press is reporting that Continental Airlines is apologizing to passengers who endured a two-day trans-Atlantic odyssey on a jet with sewage overflowing from its lavatories.



    Passenger Collin Brock was cited as telling Seattle television station KING that sewage flowed into the aisles, only one restroom was partially working, and flight attendants kept serving meals but told passengers not to eat much, and that it was the worst flight of his life, adding, "I was forced to sit next to human excrement for seven hours … it's a nauseating smell."

    A Continental spokesman was quoted as saying in a statement that, "We deeply regret the serious inconvenience to our customers and are apologizing to them and compensating them for the poor conditions on the flight as well as the diversion and delay. "
    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 21st, 2007 - 3:08pm by Brae Surgeoner

    The Hamilton Spectator today reports that an alert principal intercepted 1,500 Hershey Peanut Butter Cups potentially contaminated by salmonella which flooded a Hamilton high school Tuesday.
    The story says that the bars -- identified as Hershey products recalled in November and believed stolen from a recycler -- were brought to Mountain Secondary School by students who found them in a dumpster behind a closed variety store nearby.
    Principal Virginia McCulloch said she and vice-principal Patrick Elliott noticed the bars appearing in the halls 20 minutes before classes ended on the last day before exams.
    Eric Matthews, manager of Hamilton's health protection branch, praised McCulloch's quick thinking and the students' willingness to turn in the candy.
    There is no evidence anyone was selling the bars at the school, he said.




    Note: Back in November fears of salmonella contamination drove chocolate-maker Hershey to recall a wide variety of its chocolate bars and candies made at its Smiths Falls, Ont. plant. The company identified soy lecithin as the contaminant, though both it and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency received heat from the media for refusing to reveal the suppliers identity. For more, read: How the chocolate got spilled will not be toldThe sweet taste of truth archived at iFSN. More of the recalled chocolate bars were discovered last week in a Lindsay, Ont. convenience store. For the complete story, see: Potentially dangerous  chocolate found in  Lindsay  corner store.
    Your rating: None
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 20th, 2007 - 8:16am by Doug Powell

    Tyson Foods Inc. is the latest food company to spend a lot of money on feel-good advertising designed to enhance earnings. At a New York press conference yesterday, Tyson Chief Executive Dick Bond was quoted as saying he believes the conversion to antibiotic-free fresh chicken should "have a positive effect on our earnings," but he offered no projection. 

    At the news conference, Tyson showed a commercial from that campaign in which an announcer says serving antibiotic-free chicken should help parents to "feel good about feeding your family." The Wall Street Journal reported that the products will be more expensive but the company provided no premium estimate beyond asserting that they would be "affordable for mainstream consumers."

    The move is aimed at eliminating the sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics in Tyson brand chicken. You probably can't read the label below, but there is a full-page version in today's USA Today that I saw while stranded at the Philadelphia airport. It says:

    Chicken raised without antibiotics
    No hormones administered
    No artificial ingredients

    Except Tyson will still use therapeutic antibiotics. And in the small print, it says:

    Federal regulations prohibit the use of hormones in chicken.

    Who says food isn't marketed based on perceptions of food safety? Now if someone would start marketing based on microbial food safety.

    Your rating: None
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 20th, 2007 - 3:59am by Amy Hubbell

    The N.Y. Times is reporting this morning that, citing health concerns, the two companies, Lactalis and the Isigny Sainte-Mère cooperative, which together made 90 percent of the traditional raw milk Camembert in Normandy, began earlier this year to treat the milk used for most of those cheeses.

    In doing so, they were forced to sacrifice their Appellation d’Origine Contrôlée  or, A.O.C., status, the first time in French history that Camembert producers voluntarily did so. But they also have asked the French governmental food board to grant that status to their new Camemberts, arguing that the processing they use — either filtering or gently heating the milk — does not sacrifice the traditional taste and character of the cheese.

    Mr. Durand and his supporters beg to differ, claiming that the move is a ploy by the dairy giants to make more cheese and profits while destroying a crucial part of French heritage. If the companies’ petition is granted, they argue, raw milk cheese would be threatened.

    Is Camembert in jeopardy? This week my French "maman" went to the market and verified that Lepetit, one of the brands affected by the Isigny/Lactilis decision to quit using raw milk in their Camembert, is indeed, no longer putting lait cru cheese on the shelves.  What's interesting, though, is that they still have the "moulé à la louche" or ladle-formed indication on the box. This is one of the traditional Camembert making methods that was said to be in jeopardy (see "Cheese Culture"). 

    In fact, if Mr. Durand, as described in today's N.Y. Times article, is the only one left in Normandy who makes traditional Camembert … does that mean the French don’t really care as much about the traditional cheesemaking process as having inexpensive and easily accessible cheese?

    Evidence suggests “cheese culture” (or if H. prefers, the cultural approach to cheese) is changing in France.  Our neighbor Jean-Claude in Maubuisson, France, apologized profusely to us as he set out his cheese plate after the main course, saying that he should have provided a better combination of soft and hard cheeses, cow and sheep’s milk, etc. When we reciprocated dinner and put out our cheese platter, he commented on how well chosen our cheese variety was – even though I managed to forget a hard cheese for the selection. These details used to be an essential part of dining etiquette in France, but today they are only traditional suggestions. Jean-Claude said his mother always told him that it was good to take only three cheeses, not more. He’s nearly 60 now, and remembers the lessons he learned, but he does not honor them like the religion they once were.

    If companies want to mass produce their cheese, and market it in countries like the U.S. with its strict cheese rules (and where we don’t really have a cultural approach to cheese unless we live in Wisconsin or Vermont), then these companies do need to think about the safety of consumers. Whether safety is a byproduct of mass marketing or if it is influenced by a culture that is less tolerant of losing small children to lait cru Camembert doesn’t really seem to be the issue. The fact is, the change has been made. The impact will be felt, and other large cheese companies will have to decide if they will follow suit.

    Mr. Durand will likely continue providing to his niche markets, and if he wants to practice good marketing, he may come grow his client base due to these changes.



    Your rating: None
  • Posted: June 19th, 2007 - 1:03am by Doug Powell

    Several employees of the Captains Galley's restaurant in China Grove, N.C. apparently slaughtered a goat in the fish restaurant after hours, and local health officials believe that may have been the source of an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak that has killed an 86-year-old woman and sickened 21.

    This is, yet again, an uncomfortable reminder that E. coli O157:H7 can be found in all ruminants, not just grain-fed, factory-farmed cattle. The fall 2006 outbreak linked to bagged spinach in California was traced to nearby grass-fed beef cattle.



    China Grove resident Caleb Steedley was quoted as saying, "It's kind of ridiculous and far-fetched that they would slaughter a goat here -- in a fish place."

    Resident Tyler Halo was quoted as saying, "We used to eat here about 2-3 times a week. But now we found out there was a goat slaughtered, there ain't no way they are getting our business back."
    Your rating: None
    E. coli  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 18th, 2007 - 11:27am by Ben Chapman

    A story today in the National Post reports that Canadian farmers have filed four class-action suits  seeking compensation for losses of more than $9-billion since 2003 due primarily to government mismanagement of BSE. 

    C'mon food industry, the government isn't your mom.  You should not continually rely on regulators to protect you from everything, and expect them to know the risk associated with your business better than you do.  The government is there to support public health and create an infrastructure to produce safe food and control disease.

    Cameron Pallett, the lawyer representing the cattle farmers was quoted today as saying that the Canadian government lost track of cattle imported from the UK in the 1980s and 90s and that "the government released a report in 2006 that said the likely cause of Canada's BSE crisis was one of these cows -- whoops."  Mr. Pallett also goes on to say it took 18 months for Canada to act on a World Health Organization recommendation in 1996 to ban feed containing cattle or sheep remnants. 

    So why didn't the cattle industry force a defacto feed ban by requiring that their input suppliers not use risky products? That could have been done without the government's help -- farmers, not the government, actually bought the feed.

    Even if Pallet and his clients are correct about the mismanagement, how many other cows with the BSE were not counted or couldn't be counted?  We still know little about BSE appearance and transmission.  How well has the industry been implementing feed restrictions? The Edmonton Journal suggested not very well in 2005 (CFIA found mislabeled or problem feed during inspections) -- but went on to also blame the government.

    It's garbage to suggest that the economic impact of BSE in Canada can be blamed primarily on one player.  Like many food safety issues everyone from farm to fork had a role to play. 


    It's expected that farmers, processors, distributors, retailers and food service operators know the risks that come with their raw ingredients, processes and final products and how to manage them. If there are problems, it's industry's job to fix them. And if they can't, they face the repercussions.

    Your rating: None
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 18th, 2007 - 6:56am by Doug Powell

    Reuters is reporting that the Chinese agriculture ministry announced Monday it will support the development of environmentally friendly farming practices, like growing organic produce, to help raise food safety standards.

    Whoa. Organic is a process that has nothing to do with microbial food safety. Katija Blaine and I published results of an inquiry into microbial food safety considerations for organic produce production back in 2004.

    But, maybe the Chinese are trying to appease the Americans, especially American consumers, who want all things natural and organic, regardless of what that actually means.

    The official Farmers Daily quoted Vice Agriculture Minister, Niu Dun as telling a forum in the southeastern city of Xiamen that, "Rapidly developing (environmentally friendly farming) is of the most urgent need to guarantee food safety and protect public health.


    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Food Safety Policy  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 16th, 2007 - 2:16am by Doug Powell

    Restaurant staff at an Apleebee's in California accidentally gave Kim Mayorga's 2-year-old a margarita instead of apple juice. He grew drowsy and started vomiting a few hours later and was rushed to the hospital.

    Randy Tei, vice president for Apple Bay East Inc., which owns the franchise restaurant and nine other Applebee's in the San Francisco Bay areaa, was cited as saying the apple juice and margarita mix were stored in identical plastic bottles, and the manager mistakenly grabbed the margarita container to pour the boy's drink.

    Tei was further cited as saying the Mayorgas will be reimbursed for their medical bills, and the franchise group's restaurants will no longer serve apple juice and margaritas in similar containers, adding, "We absolutely believe it was an honest mistake."

    Mayorga was further cited as saying her son is now doing fine and that the company has been very apologetic and offered free meals, but added, "If they think I'm going back there, they're ridiculous."
    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 15th, 2007 - 2:52am by Doug Powell

    The blogsphere is circulating allegations that basil grown in Israel was deliberately contaminated with Salmonella senfenberg in Britain, which sickened dozens across Europe earlier this year.



    Yesterday, Eurosurveillance published the results of the epidemiological investigation into dozens of confirmed cases of Salmonella Senftenberg in England, Wales and elsewhere, which led to seven samples of pre-packed fresh basil, grown in Israel, testing positive for Salmonella Senftenberg.

    Fresh basil has been implicated in several notable outbreaks of foodborne illness over the years, including a couple involving the parasite cyclospora.

    A list of North American produce outbreaks from 1993-2006 can be found here.
    Your rating: None
    Salmonella  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 13th, 2007 - 8:47am by Ben Chapman

    The FDA announced yesterday that it will begin a multi-year Tomato Safety Initiative to reduce the incidence of tomato-related foodborne illness in the United States. 

    FDA investigators in coordination with their respective state counterparts will visit tomato farms and packing facilities in Florida and Virginia to assess food safety practices and use of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs).

    It's clear that the FDA thinks, as do I, that  the produce industry must do more to ensure that everyone from farm-to-fork recognizes food safety risks and take concrete actions to reduce the risks of dangerous microorganisms. And in the absence of verification from within, government is stepping in.

    Regulators and the industry in the past have have released food safety guidelines for tomatoes, but there is a lack of verification; it is unclear if all growers are actually following the guidelines. The FDA announcement is a good step, but the industry should have been able to do this themselves.

    Guidelines are a first step, but we need more creative ways to compel everyone, from the person harvesting to the person distributing, to take food safety seriously, even in the absence of an outbreak.

    A list of North American tomato outbreaks can be found here.

    Check out our papers below:


    Luedtke, A., Chapman, B. and Powell, D.A. 2003. Implementation and analysis of an on-farm food safety program for the production of greenhouse vegetables. Journal of Food Protection. 66:485-489.

    Powell, D.A., Bobadilla-Ruiz, M., Whitfield, A. Griffiths, M.G.. and Luedtke, A. 2002. Development, implementation and analysis of an on-farm food safety program for the production of greenhouse vegetables in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Food Protection. 65: 918- 923.

    We also published a book chapter entitled Implementing On-Farm Food Safety Programs in Fruit and Vegetable Cultivation, in the recently published, Improving the Safety of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables
    Your rating: None
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 13th, 2007 - 3:05am by Doug Powell

    Bill Warren of CBS 7 television in Texas reports that no one has to get sick from E. coli O157:H7 contaminated meat, as long as, "you keep everything clean, and cook the meat thoroughly."

    Cross-contamination and cooking a hamburger to 160F are not simple tasks. Most of food safety is not simple.
    Warren also says that plastic cutting boards are safer than wooden, and that if the juice is still pink, "it's not done yet. If it's clear, it's done." Not so.

    The only way to ensure that hamburger has reached such a temperature is to use a tip probe, instant-read digital meat thermometer. Research has shown that colour is a lousy indicator of doneness -- some burgers turn brown prematurely before 70 degrees C is reached, others can remain pinkish well beyond 70.


     
    To further complicate matters, an individual hamburger will cook at different rates throughout the burger depending on thickness and fat content.

    In one study it was found that when the outer temperature of hamburgers reached a temperature of 71.1ºC, the inside was only at a temperature of 56.7ºC. To check a burger, grab it with tongs, insert the thermometer sideways into the middle of the burger and wait a few seconds. As Pete Snyder of the Hospitality Institute in Minnesota has documented, when done correctly, one can observe the hot temperature at the surface and, as the probe is pushed into the hamburger, the temperature goes down. As the probe passes through the cold spot, the temperature goes up again. It is critically important that temperature not be taken with a stationary thermometer, but in a dynamic manner by pushing  through the hamburger, so that a few Salmonella or E. coli in the middle of the hamburger are reduced.
    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 13th, 2007 - 3:01am by Doug Powell

    The Irish Independent is reporting that in a study by two environmental officers of 19 salad bars, primarily in supermarkets, all but one kept food at the recommended 5°C.









    The story lists the five sins at salad bars:

    • Spilling food

    • Dipping fingers into salad dressings for a sample

    • Eating from plates while waiting in the serving line

    • Ducking heads underneath the sneeze guard (clear plastic roof) for better access

    • Refilling soiled plates — bringing back harmful germs
    Your rating: None
    Wacky and Weird  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 12th, 2007 - 8:50am by Ben Chapman

    Love the tag line of this detergent (found this on a another blog yesterday):
    --
    Dirty socks? Wash them with Barf

    For "Extra cleaning power" and a "Fresh perfume" smell, choose Barf detergent.

    This Iranian washing powder is suited for handwashing and top-loading machines only. Don't use it in front loaders.

    Barf, or "???" means "snow" in Farsi.
    --

    There are probably lots of patrons of Parker's Steakhouse in Longview, WA who are probably finding barf (or barf-covered clothing) in their laundry following a norovirus outbreak at the restaurant. The Olympian reports that at least 123 Parker's Steak House customers and two restaurant workers had become ill with noro.  The investigation is reportedly focusing on an ill patron or worker who brought the virus into the restaurant.  Don't eat poop, or barf.
    Your rating: None
  • Posted: June 11th, 2007 - 12:45am by Doug Powell

    The Florida Times Union reports that a lemonade stand run by a group of cheerleaders has been tied to an outbreak of stomach flu among at least 48 people who attended May's Isle of Eight Flags Shrimp Festival in Fernandina Beach.










    Kim Geib, director of disease control and prevention services at the Nassau County Health Department said the department determined lemonade caused the illnesses after interviewing 30 of the people who reported falling ill in the days after the May 3-6 festival.

    Though the drink was served in several spots around the festival, the health
    department investigation found the lemonade that caused the illness was
    served May 5 at the Fernandina Beach High School Cheerleaders' booth, Geib
    said.

    As I've written before, to coach little girls playing ice hockey in Canada requires 16 hours of training. To coach kids on a travel team requires an additional 24 hours of training. Shouldn't we expect all those who prepare food or beverages, even at temporary events, have some basic food safety training?
    Your rating: None
  • Posted: June 10th, 2007 - 1:21pm by Doug Powell

    Scotland on Sunday reports that Nick Nairn, one of the UK's foremost celebrity chefs, who has cooked venison for the Queen's birthday, pops up regularly on television screens and charges guests up to £300 a day to master the culinary arts has been forced to eat an exquisitely prepared portion of humble pie by a team of health and hygiene inspectors.


    Unannounced visits to the chef's cook school at Port of Menteith near Stirling between 2003 and last year resulted in no fewer than 13 recommendations to improve standards of cleanliness, equipment and food storage.

    Perhaps most embarrassing of all, officials invited the Aston Martin-driving chef and his staff to attend a cleanliness seminar.

    Nairn last night insisted the criticisms were minor and did not affect food safety, and revealed his cook school was shutting for a week this summer for a major refurbishment that would exceed health standards.

    In 2004, my laboratory reported that, based on 60 hours of detailed viewing of television cooking shows, an unsafe food handling practice occurred about every four minutes, and that for every safe food handling practice observed, we observed 13 unsafe practices. The most common errors were inadequate hand washing and cross-contamination between raw and ready-to-eat foods.
    Your rating: None
    None  |  Comments
  • Posted: June 10th, 2007 - 1:15pm by Doug Powell

    Massachusetts lawmaker James Valle, Democrat, has filed legislation that would require all new public bathrooms built in the State to have doors that open outward without doorknobs.

    Valle was quoted as telling ABC News, "It makes pretty good sense. You go into a men's or lady's room, you clean yourself up, you wash your hands, and then you have to touch a doorknob that everyone else who just used the bathroom touched. It could be seen as paranoia, but it makes perfect sense to me."
    Valle is carrying the legislation on behalf of a friend and fellow member of the Massachusetts National Gaurd, Douglas Flavin, who brought up his sanitary "pet peeve" during weekend training together.

    Flavin was quoted as saying in an interview that, "You wash your hand and you've got to grab the knob that some guy just had his pissy hand all over. It's been annoying me for some time."

    Valle said the law, if signed by the governor's pen, would not require existing bathrooms to retrofit their doors to remove doorknobs and re-hang the doors -- a grandfather clause that might stave off opposition from the building unions. "Maybe the the doorknob lobby, but not the builders," he said.

    Bathroom innovations can be seen in many places, from the all-in-one handwashing units frequently found in Kansas and Missouri (and have serious problems)



    to the retractable toilet seat in a woman's washroom in a Marseille, France restaurant.



    Visit donteatpoop.com for an inventory of handwashing materials.
    Your rating: None
    None  |  Comments